Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 12, 2025 3:05 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 287 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Braithy wrote:
In the 2nd quarter Pendleburry gave a handpass in his own forward 50 that went to ground, we recovered and lumbered the ball up field.

We eventually kicked to a 2 on 1 in our goal square to Henderson. The two-on-one comprised of Henderson's man Keefe and the other guy was Pendelbury.

He ran the entire field, stayed with the play and made the goal saving spoil on Henderson after his missed handball.

I can honestly say I've never seen a carlton effort like that since about 1999/ 2000 ...


..we're good at that when running forwards.. ..I have watched krooz run defensively length of ground trying to chase or running to help defenders many a time, have watched him run by our onballers and speedster many a time too..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:19 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7180
Yeah true, BKB ... I forget about Kreuzer. When he was healthy he was a gutbusting runner heart and soul type.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Braithy wrote:
Yeah true, BKB ... I forget about Kreuzer. When he was healthy he was a gutbusting runner heart and soul type.




..even when not 100% he still emptied his tank.. ....I can remember losing my voice in a match when I lost my shite watching krooz running as hard as he could trying to chase down the opposition as he ran by Yarran who was just jogging, I went full berserko..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:34 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7180
Well for the first time in Kreuz's career the club did the right thing by him and let him get the surgery he needs without trying to bleed more from his tank.

If he comes back healthy, he's one of our best.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:41 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Braithy wrote:
Well for the first time in Kreuz's career the club did the right thing by him and let him get the surgery he needs without trying to bleed more from his tank.

If he comes back healthy, he's one of our best.




..not by their choice, club was forced to, dont worry as soon as they can play him, they will rush him back.. ..i have no doubt about it, we will play him until we break him..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7180
... if we haven't already (broken him), huh?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:47 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 539
kruzer see you pre season training forget 2014,get that foot right and that a good start for 2015 already.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:48 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Braithy wrote:
... if we haven't already (broken him), huh?



..we've certainly tried to..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 2:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18016
Cretylus wrote:
(incidentally, the cats clearly lost to Port the previous week but still racked up 72 tackles. The Saints were absolutely hammered by the hawks by 145 points, with the hawks havign nearly 500 possessions, but they still tackled and out tackled the hawks 73 to 56. The saints almost matched the hawks in contested ball as well, but were just out classed and under manned.)


So, contested ball and tackles stats are the crux of our problems?
Yet the Saints out tackled the Hawks and matched them at contested ball yet they lost by what? 145 points?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Bv what would the score have been if they had made twenty less tackles?.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:16 pm 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4766
Pure laziness is our problem. No pressure on the opposition, given then time to steady and pin point the ball to whoever they want.

We just jog on the spot.

Also this flooding crap, when we get the ball in the backline, we look up and there is no one to kick too. Whos fault is this? Players or Coach.

We played like that for 3 quarters then surprise surprise released the shackles in the last and kicked a few.

I dont get it really....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Drewgirl wrote:
We played like that for 3 quarters then surprise surprise released the shackles in the last and kicked a few.



"Released the shackles" or Collingwood had put the cue in the rack?
I'd put my money on the latter.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:25 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
We flood because other teams moved on from that by working hard in transition.
With us it's either forward or back.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:30 pm 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4766
Well Collingwood did put the cue in the rack, but our formation was better. The forwards stayed forward and we had someone to kick to by playing on quickly.

How can we play on quickly and run out of the backhalf when we have no-one to kick too.

Flooding does not suit our players as we dont work hard enough to run to the other end of the ground and we dont have the skills to execute that game plan.

Malthouse needs to adapt our game plan to suit our lazy players.

Todays game plan suits runners, not slow stop start crap that Malthouse wants us to play.

I am not blaming him by the way, our players are lazy but he needs to adapt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:36 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3456
They're just timid and lazy.
We switched the ball in the third quarter last week from the congested members side to the open southern stand side, but only Collingwood players came across the ground. Next thing we're hand-balling on the half-back flank trying to get past the press with no get-out option further down the field.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:50 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Drewgirl wrote:
Well Collingwood did put the cue in the rack, but our formation was better. The forwards stayed forward and we had someone to kick to by playing on quickly.

How can we play on quickly and run out of the backhalf when we have no-one to kick too.

Flooding does not suit our players as we dont work hard enough to run to the other end of the ground and we dont have the skills to execute that game plan.

Malthouse needs to adapt our game plan to suit our lazy players.

Todays game plan suits runners, not slow stop start crap that Malthouse wants us to play.

I am not blaming him by the way, our players are lazy but he needs to adapt.


..no game plan suits lazy players..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
Our club slogan a few years ago was "no passengers".

MM claims we are carrying too many passengers!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 4:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:23 am
Posts: 1797
Location: Half Back Flanker...
We have players who have broken their bones for the club playing next to players earning three or four times their wage...

This only causes division in the player group.

Why kill yourself when players doing VERY well from the club are not prepared to lead?

Until we stop throwing money at a handful of players and expecting the rest of the team to carry them, this team will remain fractured.

Sure, we need to learn from the successful clubs how to recruit - but we need to learn to pay them evenly too...

_________________
"...that's the thing about opinion - you don't have to know anything to have one..." Andre Agassi commenting on Pat Cash 2004
"...the less you know - the more you believe..." - Bono 2006


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2014 2:15 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 539
we are to slow simple so we recruit a guy called cripps (lucky his tall).MM must adopt the coll,geel,port,process so in prseason start training for this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2014 2:17 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Drewgirl wrote:
Well Collingwood did put the cue in the rack, but our formation was better. The forwards stayed forward and we had someone to kick to by playing on quickly.

How can we play on quickly and run out of the backhalf when we have no-one to kick too.

Flooding does not suit our players as we dont work hard enough to run to the other end of the ground and we dont have the skills to execute that game plan.

Malthouse needs to adapt our game plan to suit our lazy players.

Todays game plan suits runners, not slow stop start crap that Malthouse wants us to play.

I am not blaming him by the way, our players are lazy but he needs to adapt.

There is no effective game plan for lazy players...

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 287 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, dannyboy, Google [Bot], keogh, Mickstar and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group