Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 9:04 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 284 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19221
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Nail on the head Sydney

And people go on as though these @#$%&! imbeciles had no impact on the game?

They were @#$%&! woeful as usual.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Sydney Blue wrote:
The three worst decisions all day was

When Goodes was tackled close to goal and dropped the ball in the first quarter and it resulted in a Swans goal


And the Second was when Robbo run down Munford and caught him cold the ball rolled out and was called a throw in - That ball should have been heading straight back in our 50

and the third was when Matner totally retarded Walker from getting near the ball he just hung onto him and it was called play on


so as usual it is not the ones they pay its the ones they dont



The punch in the melon that AJ got that left him dazed on the ground whilst the Swans ran into an open goal.

The absolute riding of Murph into the ground 30m out directly infront. Imagine the Gwilt /Mooney free kick but twice as violent with half the doubt.

Shaw and Jack grabbed Murph and Judd at every single contest. Murph got three free's, but the umps think that this will modify his behaviour, it doesn't change how Shaw plays. I'm pretty sure every free was backward of centre or on the wing.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
Effes wrote:
Kizzapalooza wrote:
Tex was giving a tagging role on Kenneally at Full Forward and spent a lot of time and energy in the goal square trying to get onto Kenneally, and off Mattner. But whenever a turnover occurred in the forward line, he wasn't close to Kenneally.

Sure, Tex kicked 3 goals, but playing a defensive forward position must mean you are accountable for your man when the opposition has the ball.

I'm not sure Tex played the role well at all.


Zing~!

Can anyone provide the number of scoring involvements Kennelly had?


Don't have the actual stats effes, but at the game I can recall Kennelly having so much of the ball in that last quarter I was wondering whether there was 2 of him.
Pretty much had it on a string.

He was continuously repelling our attacks and driving the swans forward in that crucial last quarter.

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14695
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Sydney Blue wrote:
The three worst decisions all day was

When Goodes was tackled close to goal and dropped the ball in the first quarter and it resulted in a Swans goal


And the Second was when Robbo run down Munford and caught him cold the ball rolled out and was called a throw in - That ball should have been heading straight back in our 50

and the third was when Matner totally retarded Walker from getting near the ball he just hung onto him and it was called play on


so as usual it is not the ones they pay its the ones they dont


But its alright..we finished ahead in the free kick count :roll:

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:37 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48682
Location: Canberra
For the benefit of the 40,600+ at the ground (including all AFL officials) who had NFI what that interchange cock-up was all about...

[youtube]As5uu9g_HuI[/youtube]

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:32 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
Effes wrote:
kkk wrote:
Apparently frees finished 20-15 our way. If you were umpiring it would be something like 80-2.


Anyone who brings up the free kick count in a discussion about the quality of umpiring cannot be taken seriously.


Why? Because it doesn't suit your argument?

Often we hear the quote "Yeah. But where did we get them?" This game Defence Carlton 1 South 3; Midfield Carlton 13 South 9; Forward Carlton6 South 3.

Sometimes we hear "Yeah but they got that goal from a crap free". Goals from frees; Carlton 3 South 1.

Anyone who blames umpires for the result of a game of football cannot be taken seriously.

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:45 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:02 pm
Posts: 2826
Location: melbourne
kkk wrote:
Effes wrote:
kkk wrote:
Apparently frees finished 20-15 our way. If you were umpiring it would be something like 80-2.


Anyone who brings up the free kick count in a discussion about the quality of umpiring cannot be taken seriously.


Why? Because it doesn't suit your argument?

Often we hear the quote "Yeah. But where did we get them?" This game Defence Carlton 1 South 3; Midfield Carlton 13 South 9; Forward Carlton6 South 3.

Sometimes we hear "Yeah but they got that goal from a crap free". Goals from frees; Carlton 3 South 1.

Anyone who blames umpires for the result of a game of football cannot be taken seriously.



It's not the ones that are paid, its the ones that aren't that make the biggest difference.

- Joseph copping a whack to the face, nothing, play on, his Swans opponent kicks a goal
- Bower tackles Goodes, Goodes drops the ball, somehow he gets a freekick for holding, play on advantage Swans goal
- Walker held twice blatantly by his opponent, one 5 meters out, the other about 40 meters out, both play on.
- Waite having a free paid against him for pushing off his opponent which the Swans gain possession from leading to a goal
- One of our guys got a free kick, play on advantage, Simpson kicks a goal, Waite given a kick in lieu of that for some reason, fortunate in the end he kicked it
- Mumford tackled on the wing, should have been holding the ball, wasn't, as such its a throw in, we don't have possession and have to win it back in a congested scrimmage. This also denied us a bit of momentum from the run, chase and tackle.
- Jack picks Judd up and spear tackles him to the ground, nothing, Murphy remonstrates, does nothing untoward, Sydney free kick.
- (edit: forgot this one) O'Keefe burrows into a stationary Bower arriving to tackle him, given an over the shoulder free, O'Keefe gives to Shaw who goals.

As I said, not the ones that are paid, rather the ones that aren't.

We shot ourselves in the foot in failing to take several chances but, regardless, it doesn't change the fact we were hosed on a number of calls.

_________________
"In fairness it did seem in the early days of the draft teams would just pick a name totally at random out of a hat. I'm pretty sure we picked James Cook at #2 one year. The mediocre forward, not the explorer" - Me, 12/9/2011

Carlton 2012: Lets remind them why they once feared the Dark.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:15 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
Sean,

I agree with most of those.

First "holding the man" with Walker looked suspiciously like Andrew was trapping opponent's arm under his armpit. On first viewing I was screamimg but on replay not so sure.

Waite push off to face was far too distant to the camera to be 100% sure but McBurney was much closer and I suggest it is not possible to argue with that on the evidence available to us.

In the next few days I'll have another look at the game and I bet I come up with a similar number of bad non-decisions which South could justifiably complain about.

Anyway, we had plenty of chances to win and didn't. Can't entirely blame the umps for our inability to goal for 19 consecutive inside 50s.

Regards,
kkk

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:34 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:38 am
Posts: 1313
Location: brunton room
I was at the game and IMO one person cost us this game and that was Lachlan Henderson. He choked on the big stage with his dropped marks and poor decisions under pressure and he will now have to have a huge pre season and come out on fire in the early stages of 2011 to redeem himself.

_________________
You heard it here first!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:56 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17943
kkk wrote:
First "holding the man" with Walker looked suspiciously like Andrew was trapping opponent's arm under his armpit. On first viewing I was screamimg but on replay not so sure.


That's exactly how it was. Walker clamped down on his opponents arms trying to seduce a free kick instead of chasing the ball and trying to keep it in our forward line. Unfortunately we demonstrated a few bad habits on the day that cost us including throwing heads back in the tackle and laying down for a free kick after copping a knock to the head.
It's a final. You dont wait for the umpire to do the work for you, you make it happen yourself. A few players embarrassed themselves IMO.

Hotcox wrote:
I was at the game and IMO one person cost us this game and that was Lachlan Henderson. He choked on the big stage with his dropped marks and poor decisions under pressure and he will now have to have a huge pre season and come out on fire in the early stages of 2011 to redeem himself.


He cost us the game? :lol:
He's a 20 year old kid playing key position in an AFL final. What had you achieved a 20 years of age?
Most 20 year olds cant keep their bedroom clean let alone perform an integral role in front of 70 thousand people. Get some perspective.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:32 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
Blue Vain wrote:
kkk wrote:
First "holding the man" with Walker looked suspiciously like Andrew was trapping opponent's arm under his armpit. On first viewing I was screamimg but on replay not so sure.


That's exactly how it was. Walker clamped down on his opponents arms trying to seduce a free kick instead of chasing the ball and trying to keep it in our forward line.


That said, for Walker to be able to clamp down on his arms they had to be wrapped around him in the first place. Another clear free kick directly in front of goal missed for us and most probably one that would've been paid down the other end.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:17 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
He certainly clamped down on the arms but he was in front and Mattner had arms around him. If it was Lloyd at FF it's a free everyday. It was good forward play by Walker to hold position.
Later he was blatantly retarded by Mattner pulling on his arm. no free.

p.s Walker was on Mattner in the last qtr. not Kenneally.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:27 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
woof wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
And another major point I wanted to make which I made in the previous thread and that is that the Gibbs v Goodes match up is possibly the dumbest bit of coaching I've ever come across. Just because Gibbs beat Goodes once (when Goodes was on one leg) Ratts continues to play Gibbs on him even though Goodes has beaten him every single time. Here we have one of our best players doing as tagging job and guess what? It didn't work anyway, the Swans got 24 touches out of their bloke and we get 14 worthless touches out of Bryce deep inside our defensive 50 where they didn't count. Stupid stupid dumb coaching, something that even Leigh Matthews pointed out in the third quarter. He wondered why you'd persist with such a match up when Gibbs clearly wasn't stopping Goodes anyway. Roos must've been laughing all the way to the bank. Give us Bryce on the ball in the last term playing his natural attacking game and we win IMO.


That's an awfully long post about a dumb coaching move without providing an alternative solution.
I think the least you could do is say he should have tried this .......
So here is your opportunity, he should have tried this .....



Hang on, are you saying Gibbs beat Goodes? Are you saying he curbed his influence? Because the game was there to be won and Gibbs wasn't stopping Goodes anyway.

If Goodes moved forward I'd have given Bower the job and when he played midfield you get Carrazzo to run with him and then work off him. There would also be the option of getting an Ellard to stick with him if we wanted Carrazzo to freewheel and do damage like he did. Either way, after two and a bit quarters of limited success, surely the option was there to pull Gibbs off him and let Bryce set up the win? Like I said, stupid dumbass coaching.


I could only think of one other player on our list who would be able to compete with Goodes in the middle and perhaps limit his effectiveness when he went forward and that would have been Grigg. My opinion is that your suggestion of combating Goodes with one player doing it in the middle and another doing it when he went forward would have resulted in a replica of many other times when we played Sydney, it would look like Sydney had 5 extra players on the field.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:31 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13155
Location: Melbourne
I simply cannot understand how Judd getting spear tackled was not paid a free kick. This is something the AFL have been trying to get rid of yet if they don't penalise it players will keep doing it!!

It also happened to Waite in the Geelong match - no free kick paid either and he got up very groggy from that tackle. Hunt was later cited by the MRP and suspended a week. Of course the MRP were busy when the Carlton vs Swans game came up this week :roll:

I am not blaming the umpires at all, but you can not deny they were terrible in the first quarter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:27 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19221
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
kkk wrote:
Effes wrote:
kkk wrote:
Apparently frees finished 20-15 our way. If you were umpiring it would be something like 80-2.


Anyone who brings up the free kick count in a discussion about the quality of umpiring cannot be taken seriously.


Why? Because it doesn't suit your argument?

Often we hear the quote "Yeah. But where did we get them?" This game Defence Carlton 1 South 3; Midfield Carlton 13 South 9; Forward Carlton6 South 3.

Sometimes we hear "Yeah but they got that goal from a crap free". Goals from frees; Carlton 3 South 1.

Anyone who blames umpires for the result of a game of football cannot be taken seriously.


Show me where in my post I blambed them for the result of the game?

I simply pointed out, that once again, they were terrible at what they're paid to do.

We only have ourselves to blame for the result but it doesn't mean these @#$%&! imbeciles shouldn't receive any criticism either.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:52 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
bluegirl72 wrote:
yep well that stung.
and you go over stuff in your head...could 've..what if...if only .
but..I'm so proud of 'em..and the way they fought.

sure it'll be tough to watch dogs v swans..but that's because we know we are good enough. we weren't just making up the numbers..we earnt some respect..and in a way..we still stuck it up a lot of people.
I don't think we'll be dismissed so easily in people's reckoning for 2011.
since they copped a huge whack from everyone a few weeks back..they haven't folded. they stand up and fight.

There is just so much to look forward to next year.
thanks blueboys. :clap: :thumbsup:

http://talkingcarlton.com/files/blueboys.mp3

maybe I'll get my song up on the new website? :lol:

((pigs might fly!!)



Is that you performing?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:33 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48682
Location: Canberra
bluegirl72 wrote:
yep well that stung.
and you go over stuff in your head...could 've..what if...if only .
but..I'm so proud of 'em..and the way they fought.

sure it'll be tough to watch dogs v swans..but that's because we know we are good enough. we weren't just making up the numbers..we earnt some respect..and in a way..we still stuck it up a lot of people.
I don't think we'll be dismissed so easily in people's reckoning for 2011.
since they copped a huge whack from everyone a few weeks back..they haven't folded. they stand up and fight.

There is just so much to look forward to next year.
thanks blueboys. :clap: :thumbsup:

http://talkingcarlton.com/files/blueboys.mp3

maybe I'll get my song up on the new website? :lol:

((pigs might fly!!)


I just gave this a plug to SEN via twitter, maybe they will play it. :thumbsup:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:36 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Perth
Cool song!

Got a rock version? :twisted:

_________________
I support the Navy Blues whatever happens!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Mickstar wrote:
Rich killed us in the final quarter last year and we watched....................i cannot believe nobody had noticed,but this year it was Kenneally..............Kenneally was charging in that last quarter.He continually charged through the guts.We were on top in the first ten minutes of the last quarter with out putting them away.You new the momentum would shift and had to prepare your self.You gotta sense danger.Gut instinct,you could feel it................Kenneally is renown for this.Cant believe he was allowed to rampage unchecked..............i've been dead against Ratts getting Laidley on board,but after yesterday im might change my mind...........seriously,i just dont think Ratts has a feel or instinct for subtle momentum shifts or imminent danger just around the corner.


By this argument Roos is a crap coach too for "letting" Judd go beserk in the 3rd quarter. IMO sometimes good players play well and there's not much you can do about it. That's why they are considered 'good' players.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:12 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
BigKev wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Rich killed us in the final quarter last year and we watched....................i cannot believe nobody had noticed,but this year it was Kenneally..............Kenneally was charging in that last quarter.He continually charged through the guts.We were on top in the first ten minutes of the last quarter with out putting them away.You new the momentum would shift and had to prepare your self.You gotta sense danger.Gut instinct,you could feel it................Kenneally is renown for this.Cant believe he was allowed to rampage unchecked..............i've been dead against Ratts getting Laidley on board,but after yesterday im might change my mind...........seriously,i just dont think Ratts has a feel or instinct for subtle momentum shifts or imminent danger just around the corner.


By this argument Roos is a crap coach too for "letting" Judd go beserk in the 3rd quarter. IMO sometimes good players play well and there's not much you can do about it. That's why they are considered 'good' players.

:thumbsup:

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 284 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cazzesman, Google [Bot] and 132 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group