Sydney Blue wrote:
He played well yesterday and kicked four goals - probably should have had 5 or 6
But lets not forget if we are going to be critical of Fev for allowing his opponent to run off him and have 20 possessions we have to be just as harsh on Ohailpin - His opponent Grover had 26 touches yesterday and was very good at leaving Santy and chopping out Fev.
He was good going one way but the last thing we need is another forward allowing his man to rack up touches - Cloke was lambasted from pillar to post for not applying defensive pressure
He was good but his opponent was close to being their best
That might be true if Setanta has minimal influence on the game, but by definition, Grover can't have been their best if his opponant kicked 4 (should have been 6), and his team lost by 15.
Really it comes down to hurt factor. If you're kicking goals, and your opponent is not paying your any respect. That's his problem. No-one cares who Fev's opponent is or what he's doing when the team is up and Fev is "on".
BUt when you're having a dog of a day (like Fev last week), and your opponent is running off you, that's your problem. Fev's issue is when he needs to be accountable for his man, he generally can't be arsed.
You also gotta look at the big picture. If Setanta can manage 3-4 goals every week for the rest of the season, how often will his man drop off him to chop Fev our next year? Not very often. Ultimately, that's what we want. But Setanta has to be damaging for it to be a credible threat. So I can live with him being more focused on the offensive side of his game while he builds some street cred.