Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 7:23 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:16 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Cazzesman wrote:
http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/find-cats-ingredient-x/2008/08/20/1218911828779.html?page=2

Interesting view from the article by Jake Naill.........

There's a compelling argument that Geelong's actual "edge" was its patience; that the Cats actually walked the talk and truly embraced a long-term view, recognising when Mark Thompson arrived in 1999 that a premiership would probably take seven or eight years.

All clubs mouth the platitudes about "long-term" and "youth," but few of them are willing to stick with a coach for seven or eight years without much success, and few hold their nerve on an uncompromising youth policy when the natives get restless and ex-players begin calling for heads.

Not that Geelong was ideologically pure in its desire to build a team from scratch. The Cats were lucky that no one wanted to play for them, that they couldn't acquire the key forward they so desperately sought, and were forced to stick with kids.


Sadly it is the current society. Nobody wants to wait a minute for success by doing the hard yards, they (supporters) all want it yesterday.

Regards Cazzesman


Caz,

Patience is not the point. I certainly agree Ratten has been OK. I will repeat it again. He needs to improve. I can wait another year but unless he becomes more proacitve and displays and ability to impliment a plan "b", we won't beat the top sides. I have never read a post where you have not followed the party line. Also, I hope you are pushing your youth line when the name D. Kerr comes up. Don't come back posting how great a recruting move if we give up a first or second rounder for him. I just want to make sure you are batting for youth where it counts in the inner sanctum, not just running a hard line on this forum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Be an interesting test for Brett Ratten this week....plenty of comment mainly negative about Leigh Matthews coaching over recent months and that he is past it and I reckon Matthews must be on the edge of getting the chop with rumours that him and his main man J.Brown might not be getting on so well anymore..

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:28 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
So has anyone actually called for Rattens head? I must've missed the posts wanting him sacked..

Why is it such a crime here to have an opinion away from the 'company line'?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
I don't think it is Budzy!

A crime that is!

Many posters have been vociferous on Ratts this year... Synners obviously, and Michael Jezz too. Melvey has been critical. The Duke has been critical, as has cj69. Jarusa has been critical too.

Some of them may have called for Ratten's head, others may not. Regardless, I see plenty of posts going right away from being a company line. I've certainly had people debate my support of Ratten quite vociferously.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:55 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Not one person on TC has asked for Ratten to be sacked.

That's just silly.

There have been criticisms of aspects of his coaching and that is about it.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:19 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
oh that's fine then, spiffing in fact...anyone for some butter with their bread?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:19 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
I didn't read the whole Jake Niall article, but if he's saying that Geelong "couldn't acquire the key forward they so desperately sought, and were forced to stick with kids"...

isn't he forgetting one Brad Ottens, whom Geelong traded draft picks to Richmond for? Granted, he's a ruck/forward, but they certainly weren't as 'pure' as all that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Agree John M
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:04 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Ottens is the exception and incidentally seems to be the only foreign legion addition to a team otherwise almost purely drafted -harley did play 1 game for Port - geelong is certainly a creature of the draft system

Agree with Cazz that we need to be patient understand that the steps/advancement are going to be incremental
Geelongs ultimate success begun in the draft of 2001 -where they got 6 picks in the first 40 -it takes time - and keep the faith


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Agree John M
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
frank dardew wrote:
Ottens is the exception and incidentally seems to be the only foreign legion addition to a team otherwise almost purely drafted -harley did play 1 game for Port - geelong is certainly a creature of the draft system

Agree with Cazz that we need to be patient understand that the steps/advancement are going to be incremental
Geelongs ultimate success begun in the draft of 2001 -where they got 6 picks in the first 40 -it takes time - and keep the faith


Disagree Frank, the 1998 and 1999 drafts produced these players for Geelong.

David Wojzinski

Mooney in a trade.

Joel Corey
Paul Chapman
Cameron Ling
Corey Enright

that is a fair return for two years.

not to mention Scarlett as a F/S in 1997! :shock:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Jarusa
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:56 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Sorry your right Mooney also foreign legion
You are wrong about 2001 not being pivotal to their success-without it they wouldnt be anywhere near where they are today
But still maintain 2001 was really the draft that got them going - they picked up bartel kelly steve johnson ABLETT arguably 3 of the 4 are their best players at the moment in that draft
They also picked up Playfair Gardiner and David Johnson in that draft- all who played senior games for their clubs this year -they got draft picks for playfair and gardiner last year and if Geelong wasnt so strong D Johnson would have played a lot more games
I would say that in fact 2001 was the best recruiting /drafting by a club in the history of the draft -absolutely remarkable
PS AGREE THAT 99 AND 98 WERE GOOD but as Bruce


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:25 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
Michael Jezz wrote:
Also, I hope you are pushing your youth line when the name D. Kerr comes up. Don't come back posting how great a recruting move if we give up a first or second rounder for him. I just want to make sure you are batting for youth where it counts in the inner sanctum, not just running a hard line on this forum


I think if you check the Kerr thread I have contributed one post which was directed to DOA and had nothing to do with my thoughts on Kerr. I have no idea what hard line you are referring to in relation to Kerr.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Last edited by Cazzesman on Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Agree John M
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25361
Location: Bondi Beach
frank dardew wrote:
Ottens is the exception and incidentally seems to be the only foreign legion addition to a team otherwise almost purely drafted -harley did play 1 game for Port - geelong is certainly a creature of the draft system

Agree with Cazz that we need to be patient understand that the steps/advancement are going to be incremental
Geelongs ultimate success begun in the draft of 2001 -where they got 6 picks in the first 40 -it takes time - and keep the faith


Mooney: North Melbourne

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:52 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
budzy wrote:
So has anyone actually called for Rattens head? I must've missed the posts wanting him sacked..

Why is it such a crime here to have an opinion away from the 'company line'?


I don't think that there has been a post asking him to be sack, but there are quite a few who believe quite strongly that he should never been appointed, which you can take a little as wanting them sacked.

I have my reservations about Ratts, but I like that he is working on the most important issues first with the view of development rather than following the whims of posters on this site.

My question to the detractors of Ratts is how do you know that the players are following his instructions? How do you know how Ratts wants to develop the players? What merits does a player need to fulfill in order to get a call up to seniors?

So far most of the bagging of Ratts is peoples opinion that he's not developing the players the way that they would do it. Pagan had a saying that 90% of football is played above the shoulders, well I would say that the players state of mind is 3000% better than when Ratts took over.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:45 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Cazzesman wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Also, I hope you are pushing your youth line when the name D. Kerr comes up. Don't come back posting how great a recruting move if we give up a first or second rounder for him. I just want to make sure you are batting for youth where it counts in the inner sanctum, not just running a hard line on this forum


I think if you check the Kerr thread I have contributed one post which was directed to DOA and had nothing to do with my thoughts on Kerr. I have no idea what hard line you are referring to in relation to Kerr.

Regards Cazzesman


Run the hard line to pursue youth and keep our first and second round draft picks when you are asked your opinion as whether Carlton should recruit D. Kerr.....push hard for youth Caz. You can do it. Represent the people with a hard lined youth policy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:15 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
recruitment as a democracy - hey that's surely gotta work :garthp:

JR's in

Out

Vote

Okay JR's legs get to play this week but his head's out!

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Last edited by dannyboy on Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:21 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
Michael Jezz wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Also, I hope you are pushing your youth line when the name D. Kerr comes up. Don't come back posting how great a recruting move if we give up a first or second rounder for him. I just want to make sure you are batting for youth where it counts in the inner sanctum, not just running a hard line on this forum


I think if you check the Kerr thread I have contributed one post which was directed to DOA and had nothing to do with my thoughts on Kerr. I have no idea what hard line you are referring to in relation to Kerr.

Regards Cazzesman


Run the hard line to pursue youth and keep our first and second round draft picks when you are asked your opinion as whether Carlton should recruit D. Kerr.....push hard for youth Caz. You can do it. Represent the people with a hard lined youth policy


:wink:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:23 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
dannyboy wrote:
recryitment as a democracy - hey that's surely gotta work :garthp:

JR' is

Out

Vote

Okay JR's legs get to play this week but his head's out!


There could be a phone-in or SMS-in number. Could be a great money-raiser for the club!

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:59 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
a raffle!

oh hang on some say we are doing that now

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:17 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Steve_C7 wrote:
budzy wrote:
So has anyone actually called for Rattens head? I must've missed the posts wanting him sacked..

Why is it such a crime here to have an opinion away from the 'company line'?


I don't think that there has been a post asking him to be sack, but there are quite a few who believe quite strongly that he should never been appointed, which you can take a little as wanting them sacked.

I have my reservations about Ratts, but I like that he is working on the most important issues first with the view of development rather than following the whims of posters on this site.

My question to the detractors of Ratts is how do you know that the players are following his instructions? How do you know how Ratts wants to develop the players? What merits does a player need to fulfill in order to get a call up to seniors?

So far most of the bagging of Ratts is peoples opinion that he's not developing the players the way that they would do it. Pagan had a saying that 90% of football is played above the shoulders, well I would say that the players state of mind is 3000% better than when Ratts took over.


Well you might think that he's doing well developing our list but it's a mixed bag from where I sit.

Some kids get to drive down the freeway (offpeak :wink: ) to the destination while others are made to take the detour on the dirt track full of potholes..

..and another thing..

..juddy said in the paper today the club has a policy that all recruits must be able to potentially play 100 games ..and Ratts is looking at Jeff White??

mixed signals!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
ratts is on the outer ? :shock: :wink:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group