Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 8:59 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 384 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:28 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
We have been in VERY poor form for 5 weeks. Rather than the philosophy 'steady as she goes ... stay with the process', we badly need to change it up.

- We are consistently getting beaten for the ball.
- We move the ball too slowly.
- Our decision making is woeful.
- We have no plan B.

We need to move the ball on at all cost ... break the lines ... lower the eyes going forward.

Can't see us winning this one.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:47 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
Paddycripps wrote:
Thought Weitering's presser was laughable.
Because he was trying not to laugh.
Or so it seemed.
Couldn't wipe the smile off his face.
Not sure why he was smiling.
And his rather off the cuff comment about mouth guards.
Maybe he is super confident we will win on the weekend.
Hope that is so.
Because I didn't see a lot of grit and disappointment written on his face, determination to make amends for what was a terribly poor team performance on the weekend.


i drafted a comment about it. not sure if i posted. when he used to do those once a fortnight ABC Sport radio interviews a couple of years ago he was pretty humble but e looked like he was doing an impersonation of a cliche smug footballer. his repeated use of the the phrase “again, like i said before…” might have been picked up from Voss but it just came across as arrogant. probably just bad media training. i hope so.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Last edited by diesel95 on Thu Aug 04, 2022 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 10:08 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
FarmerBlue wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
FarmerBlue wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

Cuningham, Ed and Stocker could be best 22, but lets call them "depth".



This is what I mean by genuine depth. Players that can come in and perform a role consistently without effecting the team too much. Cuningham & Stocker have potential but are unproven and Ed is injured and past it

For me that is not depth


But if Ed was fit and available he would be depth...someone who could come into the seniors and perform a role.

I wrote off Ed by about round 6. I got use to winning without him.
If he was fit and ready right now, I'd pick him ahead of LOB, Setters, Newnes and Hayes TBH.
But I will leave the smart decisions to Voss.


To be fair one person ain’t depth and at 33 not for long


Not that it really matters in the context of this discussion, but Ed's 32.

Just curious - why does everyone feel the need to add an extra year onto every player's age once they're in the twilight of their career? :?

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 10:24 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
BigBlueWave wrote:
We have been in VERY poor form for 5 weeks. Rather than the philosophy 'steady as she goes ... stay with the process', we badly need to change it up.

- We are consistently getting beaten for the ball.
- We move the ball too slowly.
- Our decision making is woeful.
- We have no plan B.

We need to move the ball on at all cost ... break the lines ... lower the eyes going forward.

Can't see us winning this one.


Yep, I agree with this 100%.

Our ball movement has been so slow lately that we end up boxing ourselves into a corner. The opposition has plenty of time to set up their zone and get numbers back, then the pressure builds and builds. This then causes the poor decision making and bad disposal. More pressure builds and then we're cooked!

We have to go all out for the win this weekend. Run hard to create an option, break the lines, take risks and create the overlap. If we can get the ball into space for our runners and open up the forward half, Charlie, Harry, Owies, JSOS et. al. can do the rest. Yes, we may have a few turnovers and open ourselves up, but we need to back our forwards to win the ball 1 on 1 or create the crumb. If we continue to play into the opposition team's hands, we are done.

I would rather have a crack and be beaten by a better team than play it safely and lose anyway. I really hope we see something different this weekend. Perhaps the forced changes will assist with this, but only if the inclusions are given the freedom to take the game on without consequence.

C'mon Blues, surprise us!

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 11:40 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Bondi Beach
Mil Hanna wrote:
FarmerBlue wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
FarmerBlue wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

Cuningham, Ed and Stocker could be best 22, but lets call them "depth".



This is what I mean by genuine depth. Players that can come in and perform a role consistently without effecting the team too much. Cuningham & Stocker have potential but are unproven and Ed is injured and past it

For me that is not depth


But if Ed was fit and available he would be depth...someone who could come into the seniors and perform a role.

I wrote off Ed by about round 6. I got use to winning without him.
If he was fit and ready right now, I'd pick him ahead of LOB, Setters, Newnes and Hayes TBH.
But I will leave the smart decisions to Voss.


To be fair one person ain’t depth and at 33 not for long


Not that it really matters in the context of this discussion, but Ed's 32.

Just curious - why does everyone feel the need to add an extra year onto every player's age once they're in the twilight of their career? :?


I quote the age they will be this year. Ed turns 33yo in November. He's effectively in his 33rd year. He's 32yo plus 10 months.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
bondiblue wrote:
Really interested in the selections tonight.

We have 2 mids to replace: Kennedy and Hewett.
We didnt replace a mid for Hewett when he was out for GWS, and Adelaide.


True but we've been using Walsh as a mid instead of a half forward when a mid is missing. There's no excuse this week unless they give Fisher more midfield time and bring in a half forward. Which they have done once or twice this season.
I'd prefer to see Dow get a shot.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
I always felt Jacob was an exceptional speaker, since day one he has talked more like a Rhodes Scholar than a footballer

But he lacked flow and conviction when he spoke the other day

IMO he seems caught between being told to be ultra positive and being realistic about the team needing to harden up

Clearly the players have been told be project positivity this week . Harry spoke in a similar tone

But I think they can be positive while also being realistic and commenting with more passion about the fact they need to be a lot harder and competitive (and consistently so)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:05 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
bondiblue wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
FarmerBlue wrote:

To be fair one person ain’t depth and at 33 not for long


Not that it really matters in the context of this discussion, but Ed's 32.

Just curious - why does everyone feel the need to add an extra year onto every player's age once they're in the twilight of their career? :?


I quote the age they will be this year. Ed turns 33yo in November. He's effectively in his 33rd year. He's 32yo plus 10 months.


Not that it was you who said it in the first place, but that doesn't make any sense to me sorry. On this basis, someone who was 33 on the first day of January is the same age as someone who turns 33 on the 31st December? If anything, Ed is a genuine 32yo as he doesn't turn 33 until after the season is over.

Anyway, I know it is all just semantics, I have just never understood it.

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
BigBlueWave wrote:
We have been in VERY poor form for 5 weeks. Rather than the philosophy 'steady as she goes ... stay with the process'we badly need to change it up.

- We are consistently getting beaten for the ball.
- We move the ball too slowly.
- Our decision making is woeful.
- We have no plan B.

We need to move the ball on at all cost ... break the lines ... lower the eyes going forward.

Can't see us winning this one.


Plan B?
We won most early games by dominating centre clearance. When Essendon* went to work on our strength and beat us out of the middle, we changed it up and scored successfully by using back half rebound. That's 2 totally different ways to win a game.
FFS, we've had these coaches for less than 12 months.

We're 12-7 after 20 years of crap. Put the razor blades away.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:22 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24612
Location: Kaloyasena
Blue Vain wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
We have been in VERY poor form for 5 weeks. Rather than the philosophy 'steady as she goes ... stay with the process'we badly need to change it up.

- We are consistently getting beaten for the ball.
- We move the ball too slowly.
- Our decision making is woeful.
- We have no plan B.

We need to move the ball on at all cost ... break the lines ... lower the eyes going forward.

Can't see us winning this one.


Plan B?
We won most early games by dominating centre clearance. When Essendon** went to work on our strength and beat us out of the middle, we changed it up and scored successfully by using back half rebound. That's 2 totally different ways to win a game.
FFS, we've had these coaches for less than 12 months.

We're 12-7 after 20 years of crap. Put the razor blades away.



Much quicker to do this:



_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Last edited by AGRO on Thu Aug 04, 2022 9:30 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
BigBlueWave wrote:
We have been in VERY poor form for 5 weeks. Rather than the philosophy 'steady as she goes ... stay with the process', we badly need to change it up.

- We are consistently getting beaten for the ball.
- We move the ball too slowly.
- Our decision making is woeful.
- We have no plan B.

We need to move the ball on at all cost ... break the lines ... lower the eyes going forward.


I support the steady as she goes philosphy. We've come a long way and Voss has said numerous times this is about long term and building us in a successful club over a sustained period.
At the moment we trying to find the balance between attack and defence and controlling the tempo. At the start of the year we were run and gun and then hung on to win a few games. At the moment we look like we have gone to far into slowing the game down.

I would definitely try and release them a bit this week and be more attacking but this is very much in line with what is trying to be achieved.

It's been hard to get it all going and will need another pre season. Also, having many key players injured makes it hard to have some consistency as we simply don't have the depth

I feel our best team and beat anyone but if we don't we fall away.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 1:17 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14342
Location: Sydney
Mil Hanna wrote:
Not that it was you who said it in the first place, but that doesn't make any sense to me sorry. On this basis, someone who was 33 on the first day of January is the same age as someone who turns 33 on the 31st December? If anything, Ed is a genuine 32yo as he doesn't turn 33 until after the season is over.

Anyway, I know it is all just semantics, I have just never understood it.


:D I'm with you mate. I vaguely remember having a conversation midway through this season (or possibly last season) about the next November draft, and someone was aging players by how old they'd be at the end of the following season, or maybe even the following calendar year. I was scrambling to Wikipedia, thinking "no way is H McKay 26 already surely?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 1:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:31 pm
Posts: 1390
BV - I agree with you in that the half-forward flanks pushing up to the midfield is unsustainable (especially with Pitto back), do you reckon it's better to go back to a conventional 6-2-4-6 set up, or is there some value in throwing Walsh behind the footy for a couple weeks, and try to replicate the issue we've had in our forward 50 with other teams?

Think teams after last week are going to put a lot of time into Saad and to a lesser extent, Doc as much as possible, getting the extra quality ball user in the back half might be useful also.

Looking at Melbourne's key stats in the second half of the year - their ability to keep the ball in their inside 50 has been below comp average, compared to setting the standard in the finals last year. I think it's a weakness that could be exploited.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 1:38 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
GreatEx wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Not that it was you who said it in the first place, but that doesn't make any sense to me sorry. On this basis, someone who was 33 on the first day of January is the same age as someone who turns 33 on the 31st December? If anything, Ed is a genuine 32yo as he doesn't turn 33 until after the season is over.

Anyway, I know it is all just semantics, I have just never understood it.


:D I'm with you mate. I vaguely remember having a conversation midway through this season (or possibly last season) about the next November draft, and someone was aging players by how old they'd be at the end of the following season, or maybe even the following calendar year. I was scrambling to Wikipedia, thinking "no way is H McKay 26 already surely?"


Yep, it drives me nuts!!

I think the origins come from the trade period when someone is mounting an argument against recruiting a player that usually goes along the lines of:

Poster A: "Player X is 29 years old, we shouldn't be paying overs for someone that is close to the end of his career"

Me: **after checking the AFL website** "But he is 27 and doesn't even turn 28 until 20th December this year?" :confused:

Poster A: "Yeah, but he won't be playing at our club until next year and he is turning 29 next year"

Me: :garthp:

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 1:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
Mil Hanna wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
Not that it was you who said it in the first place, but that doesn't make any sense to me sorry. On this basis, someone who was 33 on the first day of January is the same age as someone who turns 33 on the 31st December? If anything, Ed is a genuine 32yo as he doesn't turn 33 until after the season is over.

Anyway, I know it is all just semantics, I have just never understood it.


:D I'm with you mate. I vaguely remember having a conversation midway through this season (or possibly last season) about the next November draft, and someone was aging players by how old they'd be at the end of the following season, or maybe even the following calendar year. I was scrambling to Wikipedia, thinking "no way is H McKay 26 already surely?"


Yep, it drives me nuts!!

I think the origins come from the trade period when someone is mounting an argument against recruiting a player that usually goes along the lines of:

Poster A: "Player X is 29 years old, we shouldn't be paying overs for someone that is close to the end of his career"

Me: **after checking the AFL website** "But he is 27 and doesn't even turn 28 until 20th December this year?" :confused:

Poster A: "Yeah, but he won't be playing at our club until next year and he is turning 29 next year"

Me: :garthp:



Depends how you look at it. I have always looked at players as what age they are that year. Like Ed is 33 this year, he's actually closer to 33 than 32.

For me it comes from breeding horses. They always the age they are that year

As long as your consistent


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 2:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7470
Location: Bendigo
At this point in his career, Ed’s age is measured in calf strains.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 3:04 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Vain wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Really interested in the selections tonight.

We have 2 mids to replace: Kennedy and Hewett.
We didnt replace a mid for Hewett when he was out for GWS, and Adelaide.


True but we've been using Walsh as a mid instead of a half forward when a mid is missing. There's no excuse this week unless they give Fisher more midfield time and bring in a half forward. Which they have done once or twice this season.
I'd prefer to see Dow get a shot.


Cripps Walsh Cerra is a good starting midfield group
Mix it up with Dow, Fisher and Jack.

Its definitely Dow time.
He should have had a few games by now.
Plus I prefer Dow to Fogarty.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 3:47 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 374
Dow might finally get a game with ,kennedy/hewett missing now more pressure on him . What about hayes playing in the middle his experience enough ,strong enough,if atkins from cats why not hayes .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
Rod Spooky Galt wrote:
BV - I agree with you in that the half-forward flanks pushing up to the midfield is unsustainable (especially with Pitto back), do you reckon it's better to go back to a conventional 6-2-4-6 set up, or is there some value in throwing Walsh behind the footy for a couple weeks, and try to replicate the issue we've had in our forward 50 with other teams?

Think teams after last week are going to put a lot of time into Saad and to a lesser extent, Doc as much as possible, getting the extra quality ball user in the back half might be useful also.

Looking at Melbourne's key stats in the second half of the year - their ability to keep the ball in their inside 50 has been below comp average, compared to setting the standard in the finals last year. I think it's a weakness that could be exploited.


That's why we miss Williams. He's a good ball user and his run is helpful. He's not a great defender but his weapons make up for it. If the opposition are going to shut down Saad, Williams and Docherty, good luck to them. They'll end up with a totally dysfunctional front half.
FWIW, I think McGovern is the key. He's our best ball user in the back half and we should be using him more. We're freeing up Weitering or Doc as our spare, that's crazy. Free up McGovern and get the ball in his hands more often. Saad is a great runner and breaks the lines beautifully but McGoverns kicking is surgical. Saad can still run past for handballs but it's important his priority is his opponent and not the contest.

As for the front half, I agree with you that we need to sort out the spares. Forget sending 2 up to the storage. Walsh is being picked up by the winger or opposition half forward anyway so the strategy is no longer a surprise. I think we need to start taking something away from the opposition.
Get Cottrell to tag Neale or to pick up the opposition defensive spare. If we persist in playing a 4 or 5 man forward line, we should decide who's the spare defender, not the opposition coaches. Play Cottrell half forward (he's shown he can mark and kick goals) and get him to go to the defender that suits us.
If the lesser defender wants to go with him as well, that's even better. A 2 on 1 is far preferable than a loose spare.

I like how the coaches want us to play "our way". But "our way" needs to evolve and counter the strategies that are being employed against us.
We've significantly improved our defensive profile by playing a more risk averse game style but it has stymied our offence.
I think we need a bit more balance. Our small forwards are pushing up to defend and as a result, not getting back to provide groundball support deep forward. Hopefully the coaches are working on it. I have a lot of faith in Voss and Hansen.
Let's see what they come up with.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:50 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
Blue Vain wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
We have been in VERY poor form for 5 weeks. Rather than the philosophy 'steady as she goes ... stay with the process'we badly need to change it up.

- We are consistently getting beaten for the ball.
- We move the ball too slowly.
- Our decision making is woeful.
- We have no plan B.

We need to move the ball on at all cost ... break the lines ... lower the eyes going forward.

Can't see us winning this one.


Plan B?
We won most early games by dominating centre clearance. When Essendon** went to work on our strength and beat us out of the middle, we changed it up and scored successfully by using back half rebound. That's 2 totally different ways to win a game.
FFS, we've had these coaches for less than 12 months.

We're 12-7 after 20 years of crap. Put the razor blades away.


I just think we need a change up. Teams have worked us out. The last few weeks have been painful to watch because other teams have controlled us.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 384 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Still got the blues and 107 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group