Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 6:05 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:41 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
Yes, yes.
Wonderful contribution Sugarcane. We get it.

Big Kahuna boot wrote:
2011 season overall was very uncompetitive for the actual comp.,.. ..there was a clear inbalance in regards to teams' quality, with a huge divide between the good teams and the rest of the competition.. ..we finished 5th, but were 2.5 games clear of 4th and still had yet to bridge the gap between our best and worst performances..

..and for 2011 we never beat anyone above us and were competitive in some games we lost, but in others were well off the pace of comp. leaders.. ..this season we've been right in every game, even the ones where we performed poorly.. ..in 2011 we'd have dropped away and been well beaten.. ..this year we also havent beaten anyone above us [now], but we've been far more competitive..

..and we have a system, and a process.. ..we have a gameplan, and are not purely reliant upon individual brilliance..


Really?
What system and game plan have you noted that is different to last year?

As for 2011 being an uncompetitive year for the comp, what does that mean? There was no GWS, there was no pathetic Melbourne.
As for us being in every game, thats all good and well but several of those teams we actually beat in 2011 and 2012. We werent just competitive against them, we actually beat them.
I'm not sure I follow your thinking.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:04 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
BV

..playing wider, kicking longer.. ..more man on man, less reliance on a few stars.. ..and more understanding between players on field..

..it doesnt matter which teams were in the comp for 2011, and which we crap.. ..the season as it played out showed a clear divide between the top bacth [top4], and the rest of the comp.. ..there usually is a gap sure, but so as big as it was in 2011..

..as for us beating the odd good team big whoop, plenty of top teams drop a game against crap sides.. ..we see it every year, but for the last couple of seasons no, we actually havent beaten many teams above us at all.. ..but there was no consistency between efforts/performances.. ..we were either very good, or very bad.. ..we needed to bridge that gap, which we have.. ..while we are learning the new coach and he's learning us.. ..taking that into consideration as well, yes we are doing better, its more than simple win/loss record..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:23 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..as for us beating the odd good team big whoop, plenty of top teams drop a game against crap sides.. ..we see it every year, but for the last couple of seasons no, we actually havent beaten many teams above us at all.


I'm not following you.
In one breath you're saying its good we're competitive against sides, yet its "big whoop" that we actually beat them in the past. :?

What would you prefer? To have a close loss or actually win? I'm not following you.
As for not beating teams above us in previous years, perhaps thats because we were higher up the ladder and the teams above us are the best sides? This year we cant beat the Richmonds, Collingwoods or Essendons to date.
I dont think we should be lauding close losses to them. In the past our bare minimum was a win. Now its great we're close. :|

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:52 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:14 am
Posts: 577
I never seen this season as the year we push, I saw it as a season for malthouse to introduce his style, establish strengths & weaknesses and then address them, target what's required in the preseason and dispose of what's not required.
I'm happy with the season thus far, we are playing more a team brand of footy and our endeavour and desperation has improved.
What I'm liking the most though is the depth growing, players on the cusp of being A graders have stepped up ie) Gibbs, Walks, Garlett, etc and others have taken their games to a new level ie) Army, Hendo, Cachia, White, Lucas, etc.
Also loving the kids in the VFL, only seen bits and pieces of games but Buckley, Graham, Temay & Menzel all look the goods and are natural footballers rather than athletes, McInnes will be regular in the seniors & even Mitchell, Casboult & Laidler are all moving in the right direction as fwd targets.
Add Bell who is a human wrecking ball & Ellard and there is solid evidence of good looking second teir of players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..as for us beating the odd good team big whoop, plenty of top teams drop a game against crap sides.. ..we see it every year, but for the last couple of seasons no, we actually havent beaten many teams above us at all.


I'm not following you.
In one breath you're saying its good we're competitive against sides, yet its "big whoop" that we actually beat them in the past. :?

What would you prefer? To have a close loss or actually win? I'm not following you.
As for not beating teams above us in previous years, perhaps thats because we were higher up the ladder and the teams above us are the best sides? This year we cant beat the Richmonds, Collingwoods or Essendons to date.
I dont think we should be lauding close losses to them. In the past our bare minimum was a win. Now its great we're close. :|

I'm also confused, what teams have we beaten above us this season? Are we celebrating honourable losses now?

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..as for us beating the odd good team big whoop, plenty of top teams drop a game against crap sides.. ..we see it every year, but for the last couple of seasons no, we actually havent beaten many teams above us at all.


I'm not following you.
In one breath you're saying its good we're competitive against sides, yet its "big whoop" that we actually beat them in the past. :?

What would you prefer? To have a close loss or actually win? I'm not following you.
As for not beating teams above us in previous years, perhaps thats because we were higher up the ladder and the teams above us are the best sides? This year we cant beat the Richmonds, Collingwoods or Essendons to date.
I dont think we should be lauding close losses to them. In the past our bare minimum was a win. Now its great we're close. :|

Bv we were less competitive last year and our list was put together by the previous fish.

I think we're doing OK.

A third of the list is useless to us......
Judd is a shadow of his former self.
The contribution is much better spread through so is playing and our performances are more even.

Doing a good enough job.... But must build.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
There is no doubt that MM is a proven coach, he also comes across as an ordinary bloke, loose with the truth, and petulant. Those things do matter, as he showed when he tried to derail the Pies because of the succession plan. But he has got one flag in the last decade, like a number of other coaches, the best coach in the AFL Ross Lyon hasn't got a flag. MM will get a better performance from the group, he seems to be able to get good performances from players - but is this group capable of winning a flag? And if our recruiting and development have left us short of flag level talent why pay out a fortune for an embittered 60 yr old. One things for sure, is whenever he goes from Carlton, it will end badly. I admire Pagan for keeping his mouth shut ever since he was sacked, no chance MM will do that no matter how well we do. If MM had the players, he could win a flag, but Cats, Hawks and Swans are clearly ahead of us. The Bombers have a better young list and are better performed, and Freeo have a worst list but are going better. And then there are GC and GWS who are going to be really good in 3 years.

Unfortunately we need to play the long game, as we should have anytime over the last ten years. We might be five drafts from a flag. I fear we will overpay for free agents, and if we don't sneak a flag we will be back to mediocrity and MM will be back in the press, expressing his martyrdom. I am afraid I am still stuck amongst the dreadful management of the past, and until we get a committee that seems to have a clear vision for a long term future, instead of flapping around like a beached fish, the prognosis is that we become eigthton, or even seventhton.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:49 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..as for us beating the odd good team big whoop, plenty of top teams drop a game against crap sides.. ..we see it every year, but for the last couple of seasons no, we actually havent beaten many teams above us at all.


I'm not following you.
In one breath you're saying its good we're competitive against sides, yet its "big whoop" that we actually beat them in the past. :?

What would you prefer? To have a close loss or actually win? I'm not following you.
As for not beating teams above us in previous years, perhaps thats because we were higher up the ladder and the teams above us are the best sides? This year we cant beat the Richmonds, Collingwoods or Essendons to date.
I dont think we should be lauding close losses to them. In the past our bare minimum was a win. Now its great we're close. :|


..us beating top teams in the past has been fool's gold.. ..last year twice vs pies, and yet got steam rolled by port and down to gc, and we didnt even play finals.. ..before that we'd beat cats or saints during their dominance, but we'd still play badly against poor teams and peers.. ..we were up and down for years.. ..now, we're far more consistent..

..i'll take a slow build, that we're showing, over up and down performances which will never get you top 4 let alone a flag.. ..we're not getting belted this season, thats already a big improvement, bigger than i think you give credit for.. ..add in the new coach and all that goes with it, and i think in the first half of this season we've shown good improvement and learning.. ..a few teething problems, sure.. ..but we also havent been injury free like 2011 as you claim.. ..no carrots for weeks, ditto waite early on.. ..missed krooz for a month, betts with broken jaw and then suspension.. ..judd no real pre-season and so a slow start to form.. ..tough start to the season draw wise as well while we're learning new gameplan etc etc.. ..if you cant see all factors in play i can only explain so much..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:52 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
It is not about whether you like MM
It is not about whether he leaves in 5 years in a state of petulance
It is not purely about whether he wins a premiership.
It is about whether he moulds a better list and harder side than what he inherited
It is about whether in 3 or 4 years we have a top 4 side
Blind Freddie can see we are tougher after 11 games.
Blind Freddie can see he is a better at player development
He needs minimum 2 drafts to build the list


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..as for us beating the odd good team big whoop, plenty of top teams drop a game against crap sides.. ..we see it every year, but for the last couple of seasons no, we actually havent beaten many teams above us at all.


I'm not following you.
In one breath you're saying its good we're competitive against sides, yet its "big whoop" that we actually beat them in the past. :?

What would you prefer? To have a close loss or actually win? I'm not following you.
As for not beating teams above us in previous years, perhaps thats because we were higher up the ladder and the teams above us are the best sides? This year we cant beat the Richmonds, Collingwoods or Essendons to date.
I dont think we should be lauding close losses to them. In the past our bare minimum was a win. Now its great we're close. :|


..us beating top teams in the past has been fool's gold.. ..last year twice vs pies, and yet got steam rolled by port and down to gc, and we didnt even play finals.. ..before that we'd beat cats or saints during their dominance, but we'd still play badly against poor teams and peers.. ..we were up and down for years.. ..now, we're far more consistent..

..i'll take a slow build, that we're showing, over up and down performances which will never get you top 4 let alone a flag.. ..we're not getting belted this season, thats already a big improvement, bigger than i think you give credit for.. ..add in the new coach and all that goes with it, and i think in the first half of this season we've shown good improvement and learning.. ..a few teething problems, sure.. ..but we also havent been injury free like 2011 as you claim.. ..no carrots for weeks, ditto waite early on.. ..missed krooz for a month, betts with broken jaw and then suspension.. ..judd no real pre-season and so a slow start to form.. ..tough start to the season draw wise as well while we're learning new gameplan etc etc.. ..if you cant see all factors in play i can only explain so much..

You might have to use baby talk!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
[qbut we also havent been injury free like 2011 as you claim.. ..no carrots for weeks, ditto waite early on.. ..missed krooz for a month, betts with broken jaw and then suspension.. ..judd no real pre-season and so a slow start to form.. ..tough start to the season draw wise as well while we're learning new gameplan etc etc.. ..if you cant see all factors in play i can only explain so much..


2011.
Kruezer missed 12 weeks, Waite missed 12 weeks, Henderson 9 games, Carrazzo 6 games, Jamison 10 games, Judd limited pre-season.....
Explain away....

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
Trigger wrote:
You might have to use baby talk!


Another outstanding contribution. :clap:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:45 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Blue Vain wrote:
Trigger wrote:
You might have to use baby talk!


Another outstanding contribution. :clap:

:thanks:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 3:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25092
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Vain wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
We're a better team than last year.



I would hope so Bondi, considering we were decimated by injury last year.
What about 2011 when we had a reasonably healthy list. Are we a better team than we were then? Lets compare apples with apples.

Personally I dont think so but I would expect we're still coming to terms with new coaches, structure etc. I would however expect to see some obvious improvement in the next month or so.
I think our stoppage work is substantially better than it was earlier this year and our kickins are better structured than they have been for several years. Conversely, I think our defending of kickins is poor.

When I continually read how posters say we are a better team now, what measurement are they using to quantify that? Is it actual or is it people trying to justify the decision?
As I said, I dont think theres been any obvious improvement but I'm still content to give the coaching group time to get it right. I just think we need to be honest in our appraisals.
Posting comments about Malthouse being "God like" adds little to the debate IMHO.

I'd suggest we'll be in a much better position to assess our improvement or lack of it in a months time.



I still dig yu BV.

In the first half of 2011 season we only losy by 25 points to Pies and drew against the Bumbers. AS the season progressed we lost by 36 to Doggies and 25 to the Eagles and again to Pies by 19 and StKilda by 19 too. Hawks had it over us without help from umpires.

2011 was a fantastic end to the season and despite being ripped off by the umps in the final we were awesome in that game. Like everyone else we expected top 4 in 2012, but 2013 we've cut our losing margin to 17 points...and imo because of the experimental nature of our game plan in the first 3 rounds against finals contenders we blew opportunities to win each of the first 3 which we should have.

In 2012 our opponents got an idea on how to nullify the one major assett we had: extreme speed. Essendon*, depsite injuroes to Carrots and Laidler smashed us physically and the rest of the comp worked out we had a soft underbelly. With Laidler, Carrazzo missing we got beaten by Sainst by 25 and they beat us physically....that's onky 3 injuries against the Saints..Judd played, Hendo played, Kreuzer played, then the following week with only 3 players missing we got smashed by Corws by 66. We lost to Port by 58 with Waite Hendo Murphy Laidler and Carrszzo mssing (5 players) . We los a lot of games without missing half the team as many suggest we did.

Our season got better the more injuries we had by beating Doggies and Richmond hehehe...and then when our players returned from injury towards the latter part of the season we beat Brissy and Bumbers by 96 pts, only to lose against GC (missing Laidler, Hendo, Robbo and Jammo and Saints (missing only Laidler and Hendo).

The injury curse/ excuse has been used and abused and imo can't be used in the GC and Saints losses when the players were playing for the coaches survival. That says it all.

Ratts had lost the players and I know for a fact some players thought Ratts talked down to them and some players got all the attention....and as we know many players were not on a good learning curve. In other words player development sucked at Carlton.

Ratts was finished as a coach. He had reached his peak in 2011 and it all fell apart from him at the end of his tenure and injuroes were not the reason.

Our losing margin against Cats, Pies, Hawks is no greater than 17 points and we should have won each of those games. The other games we've lost by 5, 5 and 9.

Yep, its blatantly obvious we have improved with MM. He's turned things around and been smart enough to change his own game plan to suit the cattle he has.

Am I wrong or am I right or am I tripping that we're better off with a master coach MM?

The footy world respects us more than when Ratts was around. The players are playing for the coach. I do not care what Rohan C from the Age has to say...he's a bigger sook than anyone. Now if the umpires would just do their @#$%&! job and players kicked a bit straighter (not MM's doing) we'd be top 4...and you know what....I still believe we could get there this year too. Don't you?

How the @#$%&! are we not a better team than last year?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 3:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
bondiblue wrote:
How the !@#$%& are we not a better team than last year?


I have no doubt we're a better team than last year. The difference is I believe we were decimated by injury and that is an overwhelming contributing factor.
You don't. We'll have to agree to disagree.

Coaches make very little difference compared to personnel IMO. Thats why quality recruiting managers are worth their weight in gold. Geelong arent a top side because Mark Thompson and Chris Scott are master coaches. Their success comes from the quality on their list.
The Eastern Ranges in the TAC are another example. Very poor the past couple of years, going well this year.
The coaching group is the same. Its the improvement in the quality of personnel available that is responsible for their improvement.
If that quality is eroded, teams very quickly come back to the pack. I believe that happened to us last year.

History tells us it happens to the best of coaches. Look at Malthouse with the Pies in 2005. Finished 15th!
Lost 10 of their last 11 games!!!!
Was that shit coaching or did injuries contribute?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18628
Location: threeohfivethree
Sugarcane wrote:
GWS wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
What's changing names got to do with this??? Explain that to me will you...

I thought it was fairly obvious.

You hold up "pure truth" as an ideal but hide your posting history behind a series of name changes.

Seems a little hypocritical no?

And as for accusing others of sniping...you've started a thread virtually asking for people to take potshots and then had a crack at all and sundry when they've given you exactly what you asked for.

Mick's doing some good things at the club and so far I'm encouraged but that's not what this thread was ever about.

This thread was about you

Otherwise it wouldn't have needed a new thread. Could have fitted into a number of others really.

Well done.

Got your wish.

Same old MO.

Quite tiresome really.



Rubbish as usual from GWS

My desire to change names is simply because I wanted a fresh start at TC, which is a right anyone can have

But because of pathetic people such a yourself who spend way too much time here and feel they HAVE to stick their nose in other peoples business and reveal name changes, you ruin it for people like me who simpy wanted a fresh start - no crime in that surely

Christ hasn't it ever occurred to you the reason I change my name so often is because idiots like you make it impossible for me to have a fresh start???

There are people such as yourself who are just too close to TC and the online CFC community and you feel compelled to interfere

Anyhow, I still maintain my name changing, which as explained was simply due to wanting a fresh start at a different forum, has nothing to do with the MM debate. You're drawing a seriously long bow there GWS

But I guess it's your job to snipe and reveal people's identities even when it's nine of your !@#$%& business - quite tiresome really !!


If you'd stop putting up stupid posts and abusing people you might find that you don't need to keep changing your name.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:36 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Blue Vain wrote:
Coaches make very little difference compared to personnel IMO. Thats why quality recruiting managers are worth their weight in gold. Geelong arent a top side because Mark Thompson and Chris Scott are master coaches. Their success comes from the quality on their list.


I reckon Ross Lyon and Mick Malthouse are two coaches who are pretty successful with what I would call less than quality lists.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
woof wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Coaches make very little difference compared to personnel IMO. Thats why quality recruiting managers are worth their weight in gold. Geelong arent a top side because Mark Thompson and Chris Scott are master coaches. Their success comes from the quality on their list.


I reckon Ross Lyon and Mick Malthouse are two coaches who are pretty successful with what I would call less than quality lists.


Possibly but why then did the Pies lose 10 of their last 11 in 2005?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
I think people need to allow a season or two to take fold before pre empting where we are.

personally.... i look at leadership as a huge indicator of where we were at and where were at now...

we didnt address it

id blame one guy just as i would blame malthouse if its a problem year after next

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Ok, ok, let's settle this, - what is the pass mark in 2013, simple enough question, or is it a moving feast for future apologists?

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group