Synbad wrote:
windows wrote:
Synbad wrote:
BV i can ony look at efficient output..... he showed very little return for his most contested marks for the game.
thats what i look at.
some of his decisions were horrendous.
I also reckon that the tigers were not too disatisfied with him having the ball.
And i thought he didnt work hard enough.
Casboult played second fiddle on the night- roles reversed and i think the outcome would have been similar .
Hampson isnt a key forward....
The proof will be in the pudding.
Can you point out his horrendous decisions for us? He missed set shots from 45 out on a 45 degree angle. Big deal. He was otherwise sensational. His game sense has improved out of sight.
He worked his arse off.
In the absence of Waite he is clearly our best option and is coming along just fine.
his kick across the ground that went backwards and a mile away from any player?
and he made similar mistaes in the last NAB cup game.
Sensational???

The one you're making up you mean? Didnt happen.want to make up another reason to bag him?
Want to credit his handball to Gibbs for a goal? His tap to Carrots for a near miss? His double effort follow up to Judd for a snap in the third? His handball forward to Armfield that resulted in a shot on goal? His double effort in the forward line in the last that trapped the ball in - which then went on to a Jeffy goal? He was out marked once for the game, despite being double teamed many times. Ie: he kept bringing the ball to ground or he marked it himself.
Wonder how Yarran swooped on to a loose ball in the last? Hammo brought it to ground. TWICE. Kicked poorly to him both times but he fought back to cause a spill. Last time Gibbs kicked long to a two on one. Hammo fought back and spoiled. Jeffy, Chris. Point.
You'd have sung his praises had you watched it with any semblance of football understanding.