Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 9:30 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 284 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:28 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
woof wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
And another major point I wanted to make which I made in the previous thread and that is that the Gibbs v Goodes match up is possibly the dumbest bit of coaching I've ever come across. Just because Gibbs beat Goodes once (when Goodes was on one leg) Ratts continues to play Gibbs on him even though Goodes has beaten him every single time. Here we have one of our best players doing as tagging job and guess what? It didn't work anyway, the Swans got 24 touches out of their bloke and we get 14 worthless touches out of Bryce deep inside our defensive 50 where they didn't count. Stupid stupid dumb coaching, something that even Leigh Matthews pointed out in the third quarter. He wondered why you'd persist with such a match up when Gibbs clearly wasn't stopping Goodes anyway. Roos must've been laughing all the way to the bank. Give us Bryce on the ball in the last term playing his natural attacking game and we win IMO.


That's an awfully long post about a dumb coaching move without providing an alternative solution.
I think the least you could do is say he should have tried this .......
So here is your opportunity, he should have tried this .....



Hang on, are you saying Gibbs beat Goodes? Are you saying he curbed his influence? Because the game was there to be won and Gibbs wasn't stopping Goodes anyway.

If Goodes moved forward I'd have given Bower the job and when he played midfield you get Carrazzo to run with him and then work off him. There would also be the option of getting an Ellard to stick with him if we wanted Carrazzo to freewheel and do damage like he did. Either way, after two and a bit quarters of limited success, surely the option was there to pull Gibbs off him and let Bryce set up the win? Like I said, stupid dumbass coaching.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Last edited by HELLAS BLUE on Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:30 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14900
24 hours on am still devastated.
So many if only's, if only Betts had marked the ball late in the 3rd qrt, if only Judd had kicked the goal in the 3rd qrt. If only the siren for 3/4 time had gone 10 seconds later and Robinson's goal would count. If only we hadnt started so slowly. If only Waite kicked that goal early in the 4th qrt. If only Hendo had taken that mark in the goal square. If only Armfield didnt get caught in the goal square. IF ONLY. :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
kezza wrote:
24 hours on am still devastated.
So many if only's, if only Betts had marked the ball late in the 3rd qrt, if only Judd had kicked the goal in the 3rd qrt. If only the siren for 3/4 time had gone 10 seconds later and Robinson's goal would count. If only we hadnt started so slowly. If only Waite kicked that goal early in the 4th qrt. If only Hendo had taken that mark in the goal square. If only Armfield didnt get caught in the goal square. IF ONLY. :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:


I know what about AJ getting smacked in the mouth and the ump calling play on for the Sydney goal or Waite getting penalised for a soft fend off down the ground which cost us another goal. So many flower things transpired against us, it's a wonder we were within a goal at the end.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
Got back home this afternoon. Just a couple of things. Can we work on positioning a player/players on the defensive side of a ball up in our backline?
Opposition coaches know we are suspect in the last 5 mins of quarters and plan their attack for this period.
Is Mc Burney only consigned to Carlton matches? That`s 3 in a row i think. He must have umpired us more than any other team during his career.
Swans fans are flogs.
My mate took control of the speaker at Central Station and gave a great rendition of "We are the Navy Blues".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:41 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Careful The_Cranium ... a few will get very upset with you talking about umpires like that!

They do a magnificent -unbiased job. :yikes:


we all concede we lost the game yesterday when we had it won which therefore means umpiring decisions had no impact on the result....of course we can blame the umps but we can also look to other factors each to his own....


Where did he say that he blamed the umpires for the loss? :?

The game was there for the taking and we choked, so we only have ourselves to blame, but to think anything other than the fact we got raped by the maggots in the 1st quarter in particular is lunacy!

Taff - you can :garthp: all you like but that was some of the most rediculous umpiring I have ever seen in a quarter and a half of football, even worse that the scum game which is saying something. As I said, it didn't change the result of the game, but why put your head in the sand and pretend it didn't happen?

It was either of 2 things:

1) The umpires were deliberately favouring the Swines in every 50/50 call, or
2) The umpires were too easily influenced by the home crowd and crumbled under pressure.

Either way the umpires should be dropped this week if the AFL had any integrity.

However, as we know the umpiring fraternity and the Geish are a protected species and no one is allowed to say anything negative or they will be heavily sanctioned by the AFL.

That's where a big, fat :garthp: is well and truly deserved.

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:42 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
kezza wrote:
24 hours on am still devastated.
So many if only's, if only Betts had marked the ball late in the 3rd qrt, if only Judd had kicked the goal in the 3rd qrt. If only the siren for 3/4 time had gone 10 seconds later and Robinson's goal would count. If only we hadnt started so slowly. If only Waite kicked that goal early in the 4th qrt. If only Hendo had taken that mark in the goal square. If only Armfield didnt get caught in the goal square. IF ONLY. :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:


I know what about AJ getting smacked in the mouth and the ump calling play on for the Sydney goal or Waite getting penalised for a soft fend off down the ground which cost us another goal. So many flower things transpired against us, it's a wonder we were within a goal at the end.
Yep, that and the Mumford dropping the ball non decision were staggering. Agree with you also regarding Gibbs on Goodes. Just had to make the move.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Goodes is a freak...a superstar....mobile...a gutrunner; and can take a pack mark and kick goals.

I'd hate to be the one picked to play on him.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:22 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7164
Rich killed us in the final quarter last year and we watched....................i cannot believe nobody had noticed,but this year it was Kenneally..............Kenneally was charging in that last quarter.He continually charged through the guts.We were on top in the first ten minutes of the last quarter with out putting them away.You new the momentum would shift and had to prepare your self.You gotta sense danger.Gut instinct,you could feel it................Kenneally is renown for this.Cant believe he was allowed to rampage unchecked..............i've been dead against Ratts getting Laidley on board,but after yesterday im might change my mind...........seriously,i just dont think Ratts has a feel or instinct for subtle momentum shifts or imminent danger just around the corner.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:23 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
woof wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
And another major point I wanted to make which I made in the previous thread and that is that the Gibbs v Goodes match up is possibly the dumbest bit of coaching I've ever come across. Just because Gibbs beat Goodes once (when Goodes was on one leg) Ratts continues to play Gibbs on him even though Goodes has beaten him every single time. Here we have one of our best players doing as tagging job and guess what? It didn't work anyway, the Swans got 24 touches out of their bloke and we get 14 worthless touches out of Bryce deep inside our defensive 50 where they didn't count. Stupid stupid dumb coaching, something that even Leigh Matthews pointed out in the third quarter. He wondered why you'd persist with such a match up when Gibbs clearly wasn't stopping Goodes anyway. Roos must've been laughing all the way to the bank. Give us Bryce on the ball in the last term playing his natural attacking game and we win IMO.


That's an awfully long post about a dumb coaching move without providing an alternative solution.
I think the least you could do is say he should have tried this .......
So here is your opportunity, he should have tried this .....


He should have tried to resist the temptation of playing Gibbs on Goodes. Why? For all the reasons mentioned above

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:52 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:05 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Sydney
Tex was giving a tagging role on Kenneally at Full Forward and spent a lot of time and energy in the goal square trying to get onto Kenneally, and off Mattner. But whenever a turnover occurred in the forward line, he wasn't close to Kenneally.

Sure, Tex kicked 3 goals, but playing a defensive forward position must mean you are accountable for your man when the opposition has the ball.

I'm not sure Tex played the role well at all.

_________________
You can't take the magic away from me, man!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13155
Location: Melbourne
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
Got back home this afternoon. Just a couple of things. Can we work on positioning a player/players on the defensive side of a ball up in our backline?
Opposition coaches know we are suspect in the last 5 mins of quarters and plan their attack for this period.
Is Mc Burney only consigned to Carlton matches? That`s 3 in a row i think. He must have umpired us more than any other team during his career.
Swans fans are flogs.
My mate took control of the speaker at Central Station and gave a great rendition of "We are the Navy Blues".


Yeah 3 in a row with him, plus others this year. Really don't know how having the same umpire 2-3 times in a row is allowed!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:24 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
And another major point I wanted to make which I made in the previous thread and that is that the Gibbs v Goodes match up is possibly the dumbest bit of coaching I've ever come across. Just because Gibbs beat Goodes once (when Goodes was on one leg) Ratts continues to play Gibbs on him even though Goodes has beaten him every single time. Here we have one of our best players doing as tagging job and guess what? It didn't work anyway, the Swans got 24 touches out of their bloke and we get 14 worthless touches out of Bryce deep inside our defensive 50 where they didn't count. Stupid stupid dumb coaching, something that even Leigh Matthews pointed out in the third quarter. He wondered why you'd persist with such a match up when Gibbs clearly wasn't stopping Goodes anyway. Roos must've been laughing all the way to the bank. Give us Bryce on the ball in the last term playing his natural attacking game and we win IMO.
.


So at three quarter time after Ratts got the formula right and we dominated them in the third you wanted him to go an move Bower to Goodes and take Gibbs off him to put him in a midfield that had got on top. That would have been dumb coaching.
We dominated the first 10 mins of the last and had some of our more experienced players converted what they should have we would have won the game comfortably. No way would i have moved Gibbs off goodes for Bower or anyone else in our 22 and no way would i have put Gibbs in the middle with Judd and Murphy at that time well on top.

Its one thing to have a difference of opinion to the way Ratts and Montgomery used the backman but to me it sounds a bit arrogant to describe it as though it was fact as stupid stupid coaching.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:25 am
Posts: 456
Location: Kalgoorlie, WA
Gutted. Watched it at home with my Eagles fans family, who all just kept telling me to cheer up - we gave it a bloody got shot. Maybe, but it still bloody hurts losing like that.

Was feeling a bit better while at work today as my mind drifted away from the loss, but depression has come crashing back down again as I go through this thread. So close.

Judd was awesome in the third qtr. Got us back into the game and then on top. Just our inability to kick even the simplest goals killed us. And that seemed to be across the board.

What pros I can see through this yawning chasm of despair:
Davies - another game into his career and he is showing good signs.
Ellard - another player with a handful of games who didn't wilt in the finals pace and intensity.
Ruck strength and depth is awesome. Be sorry to see one possibly go in trade week and glad I don't have to decide who.
Russell's 2nd qtr. If we can laud Judd for his third, we can do the same for Russell's second.

Cons:
Jack plays for Sydney, not us.
Betts needed a map he got so lost in that game.
Bower and Jamison out of form.
Our Goal kicking is $#%^#$^%@#$@ed!

_________________
I would like to thank Collingwood for helping me keep faith in my old man. He always told me that 'People are thick'.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:50 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:58 pm
Posts: 78
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
woof wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
And another major point I wanted to make which I made in the previous thread and that is that the Gibbs v Goodes match up is possibly the dumbest bit of coaching I've ever come across. Just because Gibbs beat Goodes once (when Goodes was on one leg) Ratts continues to play Gibbs on him even though Goodes has beaten him every single time. Here we have one of our best players doing as tagging job and guess what? It didn't work anyway, the Swans got 24 touches out of their bloke and we get 14 worthless touches out of Bryce deep inside our defensive 50 where they didn't count. Stupid stupid dumb coaching, something that even Leigh Matthews pointed out in the third quarter. He wondered why you'd persist with such a match up when Gibbs clearly wasn't stopping Goodes anyway. Roos must've been laughing all the way to the bank. Give us Bryce on the ball in the last term playing his natural attacking game and we win IMO.


That's an awfully long post about a dumb coaching move without providing an alternative solution.
I think the least you could do is say he should have tried this .......
So here is your opportunity, he should have tried this .....



Hang on, are you saying Gibbs beat Goodes? Are you saying he curbed his influence? Because the game was there to be won and Gibbs wasn't stopping Goodes anyway.

If Goodes moved forward I'd have given Bower the job and when he played midfield you get Carrazzo to run with him and then work off him. There would also be the option of getting an Ellard to stick with him if we wanted Carrazzo to freewheel and do damage like he did. Either way, after two and a bit quarters of limited success, surely the option was there to pull Gibbs off him and let Bryce set up the win? Like I said, stupid dumbass coaching.


Sorry Carrot? Did you miss the last time where Bower was owned by Goodes? Maybe you went to that game too?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
club29 wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
And another major point I wanted to make which I made in the previous thread and that is that the Gibbs v Goodes match up is possibly the dumbest bit of coaching I've ever come across. Just because Gibbs beat Goodes once (when Goodes was on one leg) Ratts continues to play Gibbs on him even though Goodes has beaten him every single time. Here we have one of our best players doing as tagging job and guess what? It didn't work anyway, the Swans got 24 touches out of their bloke and we get 14 worthless touches out of Bryce deep inside our defensive 50 where they didn't count. Stupid stupid dumb coaching, something that even Leigh Matthews pointed out in the third quarter. He wondered why you'd persist with such a match up when Gibbs clearly wasn't stopping Goodes anyway. Roos must've been laughing all the way to the bank. Give us Bryce on the ball in the last term playing his natural attacking game and we win IMO.
.


So at three quarter time after Ratts got the formula right and we dominated them in the third you wanted him to go an move Bower to Goodes and take Gibbs off him to put him in a midfield that had got on top. That would have been dumb coaching.
We dominated the first 10 mins of the last and had some of our more experienced players converted what they should have we would have won the game comfortably. No way would i have moved Gibbs off goodes for Bower or anyone else in our 22 and no way would i have put Gibbs in the middle with Judd and Murphy at that time well on top.

Its one thing to have a difference of opinion to the way Ratts and Montgomery used the backman but to me it sounds a bit arrogant to describe it as though it was fact as stupid stupid coaching.


Then maybe I'm arrogant, either way it was dumb, and stubborn, and stupid IMO. I'd counter your comments by saying we may not have been so far down in the first place had we not wasted Gibbs from the first bounce. We have a superstar number one draft pick performing the role that another, less skilful player could handle. I don't mind Gibbs playing in defence if he's on a lesser player and able to sag off and use his better judgement. He is one of our most potent attacking weapons and no matter what spin you want to put on it he is wasted playing a role such as the one he played on Sunday. Simple as that.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:17 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8628
Just saw Jack's spear tackle on Judd on OTC.
Bloody discgrace.
Just because he is a Sydney pin up boy from an ARL background the AFL instruct the MRP to let it go through to the keeper.

Weak as piss

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19221
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
kkk wrote:
Apparently frees finished 20-15 our way. If you were umpiring it would be something like 80-2.


Anyone who brings up the free kick count in a discussion about the quality of umpiring cannot be taken seriously.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:30 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 890
It's not how many...
It's not the ones they pay....
It's not the ones they don't....

It's where they pay the frees and the catch up frees to even the numbers.....

_________________
Stay tuned We're in for a BUMPY ride


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19221
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Kizzapalooza wrote:
Tex was giving a tagging role on Kenneally at Full Forward and spent a lot of time and energy in the goal square trying to get onto Kenneally, and off Mattner. But whenever a turnover occurred in the forward line, he wasn't close to Kenneally.

Sure, Tex kicked 3 goals, but playing a defensive forward position must mean you are accountable for your man when the opposition has the ball.

I'm not sure Tex played the role well at all.


Zing~!

Can anyone provide the number of scoring involvements Kennelly had?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:57 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21399
Location: North of the border
The three worst decisions all day was

When Goodes was tackled close to goal and dropped the ball in the first quarter and it resulted in a Swans goal


And the Second was when Robbo run down Munford and caught him cold the ball rolled out and was called a throw in - That ball should have been heading straight back in our 50

and the third was when Matner totally retarded Walker from getting near the ball he just hung onto him and it was called play on


so as usual it is not the ones they pay its the ones they dont

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 284 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Toranasaurus and 134 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group