Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:20 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 268 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
PROS-
Played a decent opponent on an unfamiliar ground - good experience to get under our belts
Bower
Yarran
Robbo
Hadley's 1st half
Hendo, Warnock, Lucas & Davies showed some encouraging signs
Browne's last quarter
It's only the NAB cup
Murphy, Waite, Simmo, Armfield, Betts, Tex & Hoops to come into the side

CONS-
Fisher injury
We lost

I'm feeling just as :donk: today reading the posts saying Brock is a dud etc, as I did when I read the posts a few months ago that said he was going to win the Brownlow :donk:

Obviously plenty of work still to be done on how we bring the ball into our forward line and how we structure up in attack, but we knew that was always going to take some time....didn't we? :wink:

And we're still developing our defence into a cohesive unit, but we knew that was still a work in progress....didn't we? :wink:

Not a lot to get overly excited about, but nothing to panic about yet either, IMO...

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Thought I saw Lucas doing some in and under work.
Is he meant to be an outside player?
IMO this player could be real good.
Also thought Gibbs did a fair bit of the unspectacular stuff. Ditto Henderson

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:10 pm
Posts: 35
Am I the only one who thought Hampson actually provided a decent forward target (in the very limited opportunity he had)?

Plus he looked far more likely than the other tall options to actually mark the ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
isdonis.george wrote:
Thought I saw Lucas doing some in and under work.
Is he meant to be an outside player?
IMO this player could be real good.
Also thought Gibbs did a fair bit of the unspectacular stuff. Ditto Henderson

you want players to be effective if unspectacular.
Gibbs needs to be stepping up his effectiveness on games.

Can you tell me his role is george???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:01 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Sailor Man, I would bet every dollar and cents I have in the bank that if we had won last night you would have been complaining about the fact that the Swans were only going at 80%. :grin:

How many Premiership points did we miss out on last night? Because if it was 0pts then I'm happy. :thumbsup:

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:03 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
jimmae wrote:
preacher wrote:
I wonder how Mclean would have gone if had played for Collingwood on Friday night and I wonder how Ball would have fared if he had played for us last night?

Identical types.........both slow, both lack penetration in their kicking, both fail to make space...............both playing their first game for their new club. One looks ok and the other all at sea. Why?

Beacuse, Ball played in a cohesive, well organised, well structured unit and the other played in a unit that was all at sea.

First point, McLean is a good long kick.

Second point, and I have iterated this one dozens of times now, is that Collingwood's type-cast structure falls down when it matters most. Why? Because coaches always get greedy the further they push towards finals, and the system to work at its best requires younger players learning new roles within the structure all the time so that there can be regular progression in line with regular list turnover. Dale Thomas is a shining example of that.

Further to this, it makes players without the smarts for long-term AFL careers look good for about 10 games, which further overvalues them in the eyes of their own club if they again get greedy.

I'd much rather grow players' capacity to develop tactics than give them simple reads so that they crack under pressure.


Hey jimmae I don't disagree with you, although I was wondering if you could expand on your thoughts regarding greedy coaches approaching finals?

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
I have no idea what roles were assigned last night but I like Jimmae's suggestion that players should continue to learn new roles sometimes at the cost of onfield results. It seems some players are being judged more on whether they did the more spectacular things last night. If Henderson and Hampson had held a couple of marks each, if Yarran had slotted a couple more goals we'd be toasting them today.

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
isdonis.george wrote:
I have no idea what roles were assigned last night but I like Jimmae's suggestion that players should continue to learn new roles sometimes at the cost of onfield results.


but to learn a new role.. means Gibbs must have had a role last night anyway.

Can you put your finger on it??

Was it chasing cheap kicks????.. is that what he was learning???

I wanna know what was the role that should be obvious ... that was Gibbs ' last night.

I couldnt understand what he was attemoting to do for the betterment of the club as an elite prospect.

I know looking for easy kicks was one... but how did that work for the betterment of this footy club???

Anyway.. i might summons up the courage and galvanise myself to watch it again....

I know Ratts was trying to turn and teach Juddy how to play the forward pocket... and Kreuzer the other forward pocket.. after all thats what these NAB cup games are about.. rounding footballers off.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Gee....can't you tell the footys back?............ :lol:

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:32 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Warby wrote:
Gee....can't you tell the footys back?............ :lol:

Yep, the Usual Suspects aren't happy and humming Monday's Experts whilst posting.

I wish I lived in their mutually exclusive world. :sly:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
Synbad wrote:
isdonis.george wrote:
I have no idea what roles were assigned last night but I like Jimmae's suggestion that players should continue to learn new roles sometimes at the cost of onfield results.


but to learn a new role.. means Gibbs must have had a role last night anyway.

Can you put your finger on it??

Was it chasing cheap kicks????.. is that what he was learning???

I wanna know what was the role that should be obvious ... that was Gibbs ' last night.

I couldnt understand what he was attemoting to do for the betterment of the club as an elite prospect.

I know looking for easy kicks was one... but how did that work for the betterment of this footy club???

Anyway.. i might summons up the courage and galvanise myself to watch it again....

I know Ratts was trying to turn and teach Juddy how to play the forward pocket... and Kreuzer the other forward pocket.. after all thats what these NAB cup games are about.. rounding footballers off.



Gibbs look disinterested last night

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
DownUnderChick wrote:
Sailor Man, I would bet every dollar and cents I have in the bank that if we had won last night you would have been complaining about the fact that the Swans were only going at 80%. :grin:

How many Premiership points did we miss out on last night? Because if it was 0pts then I'm happy. :thumbsup:


i dont care about winning when we dont have a formula to win...

Its like saying to your 6 year old to get you a glass of water and he crawls on his his tummy across the house and comes back with the glass of water 20 minutes later.....

... shouldnt he work out to be more efficient ????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
probably just better off getting the water yourself

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:14 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Probably better off drinking something else that's in the fridge.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:05 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
I will reserve judement till after round 2 but:

Henderson looked all athlete with very little footballer
Why can other clubs recruit players that are "one touch" footballers in their first team & our entire team struggles with clean
possession and kicking efficiency
There was no workable forward structure and little lateral thinking from the coaching box


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Michael Jezz wrote:
I will reserve judement till after round 2 but:

Henderson looked all athlete with very little footballer
Why can other clubs recruit players that are "one touch" footballers in their first team & our entire team struggles with clean
possession and kicking efficiency
There was no workable forward structure and little lateral thinking from the coaching box



Henderson will be fine.. if he knows how the ball is supposed to find him... he missed a few weeks prior as well... plus he couldnt make the original intra.... to help him get some touch....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:09 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Michael Jezz wrote:
I will reserve judement till after round 2 but:

Henderson looked all athlete with very little footballer
Why can other clubs recruit players that are "one touch" footballers in their first team & our entire team struggles with clean
possession and kicking efficiency
There was no workable forward structure and little lateral thinking from the coaching box


The skill level was appalling... after 4 months of training! :confused:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Never mind.....we have to play Brisbane on Friday night now....wonder if Fev will play?

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:59 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
verbs wrote:
Rafalution wrote:
Anyone else read the thread from Bunbury 10 days before Round 1 last year?

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=24153&hilit=bunbury

I still don't care about results in the pre-season, I have faith in the FD, come Round 1 if we lose to Richmond I'll be banned for years.


That mjonc guy was so cool.


Bit of a loser if you ask me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
fraser murphy wrote:
Hey jimmae I don't disagree with you, although I was wondering if you could expand on your thoughts regarding greedy coaches approaching finals?

Pretty much referring to the idea that coaches become hesitant to change around things that are working at crunch times in games, but the philosophy seems to spread to whole games, then seasons (and so on) if the longer-term benefits of blooding a player in a role are overshadowed by the idea of more immediate success.

The real dynasties in sport come about when the team & staff are prepared to keep an eye on the medium and long term. AFL teams are not Man U so they can't spend spend spend and loan out players, nor are they NFL teams like the Patriots who can continually make astute trades for future picks and allow themselves to run a two separate and full match sim drills at least twice a week.

There are greater limitations to both acquisition and development of talent in our code but teams like Collingwood and Essendon* who take draftees and plug them into excessively simple roles doom themselves to a middle-band performance in the competition because it seems that sniff of success can throw a mighty spanner in what is an intricate development model that really takes a good chunk of the process out of the hands of the players themselves.

I may have said this before elsewhere on here, but its not at all dissimilar from a basic management philosophy known as "Theory X vs Theory Y", give that a quick google. I would label the "new" style of Collingwood & Essendon* as Theory X practice, which is generally considered out-dated in the business world save for extremely menial workforces. Treat them like peanuts, and they'll either be peanuts or they'll behave like peanuts.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 268 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group