Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:33 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 521 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 27  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:34 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
I'm not sure that legspeed is the only issue. Livo, for instance, actually tested very well in the sprinting at Draft Camp. Maybe he lost that pace when he had his countless injuries and illnesses, but I think it was more that he didn't react quickly when his opponent led for the ball. Whether Harts has the same problem is something I don't know. Maybe others could say. If that is a problem for him, then Anthony Rocca might pose a problem. Yes, Rocca can play as a gorilla in static marking contests (sometimes too well as he showed against Dustin Fletcher), but he's also a very good leading forward too. He might not have the fitness to keep it going for the whole game and he might be out of form, but we don't want to play him back into form as we did with Lloyd.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:35 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 4055
Location: Recovering from the 1st effort
We've taken the decision to stick with Harts and keep him on the list despite a series of injuries and bad form. We must have done this for a reason and the club must see something in him. He has a 1 year deal that is running out and he has finally made the Bullants best for a couple of weeks in a row. If we dont give this guy a go now then he will be gone in a couple of months.

Given the lack of other KP options, and the form of Cloke/Fisher, why on earth wouldnt we at least have a look at this bloke. He is on the senior list, we elevated and gave a go to Bentley, why wouldnt we have another look at Harts. if only to mark his dance card once and for all wwe need to give the lad a chance.

_________________
"Who discovered we could get milk from cows, and what did he think he was doing at the time?" Billy Connolly


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:35 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21577
Location: North of the border
Maybe they fancy Harts chances against Anthony Rocca - as he will be the only KPP forward Collingwood have . Not overly quick and lumbering a bit -

You would think Jamison would do the job on Medhurst again

Bower to take Jack Anthony

Austin ???

Thornton ???

Waite ???

It would be land of the giants down there

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:50 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
2ndeffort wrote:
...wwe need to give the lad a chance.


next week on RAW ...Hitman Hartlett vs John Cena :fight:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Kouta wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..for me, i'd go with this team..

FB: Joseph Jamison Austin
HB: Snotland Thornton Bower
C: Stevens Gibbs Simmo
HF: Hoops Waite Wiggins
FF: Betts Fev Armfield
RR: Krooz Juddles Murphos

Int: Russell Hammer Hadley Browne

Ins: Hoops, Browne
Outs: Cloke, Yarran

:garthp:

I love shaking my head at posts before seeing the same usernames attached to them.

After playing Waite forward last week, we might have to shift down back after the job he did on Rocca in round four last year.

Or we should bring back Setanta if Ratten can forget the fact that O'hAilpin isn't a good footballer. :idea:

It would be great to see Bower given the job with Cloke out and the Pies short on tall forwards.

Austin could play on Reid or Dawes if they're promoted for Cloke.

I think Oz played a good game on Dawes in the VFL last year


.. ..sure, we might have to juggle some player positions.. ..but in general, lets look at the forwards for the wobbles this weekend.. ..Rocca's badly out of form.. ..if medhurst, daisy (haha) come back they'll be underdone.. ..didak's most likely gonna miss, cloke's out for a few weeks.. ..i think we can spare Waite.. ..at least start him forward, and if we're falling behind move him down back.. our cloke needs to find form in the ressies, wiggins needs a functioning forward line to have an impact, and waite will help.. ..hoops needs to play, and play in position.. ..army in a FP with Betts to give real defensive pressure.. ..could swap him with hoops as well, and play army as a defensive forward on shaw/clarke..

..either way dude, not sure why yer rollin' yer eyes at my suggestion of waite playing forward, when you make mention of a few other defenders that can take the wobble tall(s)..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:57 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Virgin Blue wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
Virgin Blue wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
How can Harts be in the mix? He hasn't done anything.

.

Maybe you should actually view what the lad has done before you draw conclusions about what he has or has not done.


What's with the attitude?

I'm basing it on how i feel. It's my opinion mate - tough!
Hartlett could be a decent VFL player, but it appears as though that is it.

He has been OK a few times this year. JUST ok. Pushing for senior selection>? No, i don't think so.

So............. before you get all 'antsy in your pantsy' and acting all tough............ maybe you should realise that other people have opions too - it's what this website is for!

God! :banghead:


You said, and I quote "he hasn't done anything yet".

So, being among the Bests a few weeks running in the seconds means he hasn't done anything? what then constitutes having done something?

As I said, maybe you ought to take a look at what he has done, because failing to do that renders your opinion kinda irrelevant, in this context. It's a bit like saying you don't like eggplant if you haven't tried it. Seriously, have you seen him the past few weeks, injury free and playing in a different position to where he has played most of his footy for the Blues/Ants?

If you had you will know his kicking is arguably elite, it's better than any other genuine tall on our list and is comparable if not better to any other 195/6cm player going around in the AFL right now.

Again, this is his current form, which is all that matters. But no, he hasn't done anything yet. Right?

Maybe you should actually view what the lad has done before you draw conclusions about what he has or has not done. Failing that, your opinion, while permissible, is nonetheless fairly redundant.


Your absolutly right mate. I Appologise.

Bring him in........... he is the superstar we've all been waiting for.

I just don't like the name Adam and he's got a funny head............. so i guess that's what i was basing my opinion on. Nothing to do with his kicking or his previous games.

Maybe i should start taking notice of how players are developing and the form that they are carrying. That would be a much better way of judging them..............

Thanks for the heads-up!

:roll:

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Indie wrote:
So you can't see why talk of bringing in Harts to play in defence would bring up another tall who has demonstrated that he can play on power forwards? Amazing ...

And has Harts been doing the Waite-style sweeper role in the Bullants? To my eye, he's been doing a garden-variety fullback role. But perhaps you could explain what it is that you've seen in the Bulllants that would give you confidence he could be a sweeper.

What's wrong with Hartlett playing CHB against Rocca this week?

Your obsession with Setanta is over the top and illogical.

Hartlett can kick 60 metres and is a footballer who can play at both ends.

Will free up Waite to play forward and exploit their backline.

Setanta is behind Austin, Thornton, Bower, Jamison and Waite as a defender.

And Kreuzer, Warnock, Jacobs and Hampson as a ruckman.

Deadwood.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:02 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Sydney Blue wrote:
Looks like we now know the ins

Fish - Harts and Robbo

Who are the outs


http://sportal.com.au/afl-news-display/ ... call-70320

Maybe Cloke, Austin and Scotland.

Yarran and Austin shouldn't be dropped.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:08 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Indie wrote:
I'm not sure that legspeed is the only issue. Livo, for instance, actually tested very well in the sprinting at Draft Camp. Maybe he lost that pace when he had his countless injuries and illnesses, but I think it was more that he didn't react quickly when his opponent led for the ball. Whether Harts has the same problem is something I don't know. Maybe others could say. If that is a problem for him, then Anthony Rocca might pose a problem. Yes, Rocca can play as a gorilla in static marking contests (sometimes too well as he showed against Dustin Fletcher), but he's also a very good leading forward too. He might not have the fitness to keep it going for the whole game and he might be out of form, but we don't want to play him back into form as we did with Lloyd.


Rocca is as slow as a rock these days (pun intended).

I can't believe I am saying this but I would back Harts on Rooca one on one.

Livo's problem was he didn't grow to Silvagni height, and he was a poor kick. These two things Harts has covered.

I actually thought Livo wasn't that bad at staying with his man.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:09 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Kouta wrote:
What's wrong with Hartlett playing CHB against Rocca this week?

Rocca won't be moving out of the goal square and CHB is about 40 metres away from the goal square. That's a problem for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
ryan2000 wrote:
Virgin Blue wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
Virgin Blue wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
How can Harts be in the mix? He hasn't done anything.

.

Maybe you should actually view what the lad has done before you draw conclusions about what he has or has not done.


What's with the attitude?

I'm basing it on how i feel. It's my opinion mate - tough!
Hartlett could be a decent VFL player, but it appears as though that is it.

He has been OK a few times this year. JUST ok. Pushing for senior selection>? No, i don't think so.

So............. before you get all 'antsy in your pantsy' and acting all tough............ maybe you should realise that other people have opions too - it's what this website is for!

God! :banghead:


You said, and I quote "he hasn't done anything yet".

So, being among the Bests a few weeks running in the seconds means he hasn't done anything? what then constitutes having done something?

As I said, maybe you ought to take a look at what he has done, because failing to do that renders your opinion kinda irrelevant, in this context. It's a bit like saying you don't like eggplant if you haven't tried it. Seriously, have you seen him the past few weeks, injury free and playing in a different position to where he has played most of his footy for the Blues/Ants?

If you had you will know his kicking is arguably elite, it's better than any other genuine tall on our list and is comparable if not better to any other 195/6cm player going around in the AFL right now.

Again, this is his current form, which is all that matters. But no, he hasn't done anything yet. Right?

Maybe you should actually view what the lad has done before you draw conclusions about what he has or has not done. Failing that, your opinion, while permissible, is nonetheless fairly redundant.


Your absolutly right mate. I Appologise.

Bring him in........... he is the superstar we've all been waiting for.

I just don't like the name Adam and he's got a funny head............. so i guess that's what i was basing my opinion on. Nothing to do with his kicking or his previous games.

Maybe i should start taking notice of how players are developing and the form that they are carrying. That would be a much better way of judging them..............

Thanks for the heads-up!

:roll:


He is not a superstar.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Look, the draft is weak this year because there's not many good kids and the good young ones will be snaffled by GC this year, and then next year the GC get all the good picks, and the year after too.

So, irrespective of the fact Harts hasn't done bugger all at senior level yet, surely you hang onto him another year because he is still only 22/23, has been injured more than anyone on the list, and is 196cm with an exceptional kick.

Not saying he will make it, or be a gun, but I reckon given all circumstances and factors you keep him for 2010. And maybe even 2011.

Some talls take longer to come on.

And if you're gonna keep him then you may as well give him the odd game at senior level.

Again, not saying I am hugely confident, but I can see more than 1 argument for giving him a go.

At the very least, we have to keep the pressure on the incumbents, given how poorly many of them were last week and the fact we have won just 1 game in 5.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
IF Hartlett does come on and be the player we all hope(d) he'd be, then good on him - i'll be very happy.

Feel sorry for him with his bad run of injuries.

But the fact is, i don't think he has shown any type of decent form to warrant a place in the seniors.

As a defender - i'd much rather Setanta.
As a forward - i'd prefer Cloke (believe it or not) or perhaps even throwing Austin up there.

Hartlett for mine just hasn't shown enough. And despite the fact he was mentioned in the best last weekend, i think Robbo was one of the only ones who played like he was above the level of standards in the VFL. Crap Crap games.............. Just cause he's featured in the best doesn't mean he's worthy of a recall.

YES - He has a thumping kick and a good strong body and can take a mark - but so could Chris Bryan! He's hardly setting the world on fire.

Again........... good luck to Hartlett. But i just don't see him in out best 22 at the moment and haven't for a while.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Kouta wrote:
Indie wrote:
So you can't see why talk of bringing in Harts to play in defence would bring up another tall who has demonstrated that he can play on power forwards? Amazing ...

And has Harts been doing the Waite-style sweeper role in the Bullants? To my eye, he's been doing a garden-variety fullback role. But perhaps you could explain what it is that you've seen in the Bulllants that would give you confidence he could be a sweeper.

What's wrong with Hartlett playing CHB against Rocca this week?

Your obsession with Setanta is over the top and illogical.

Hartlett can kick 60 metres and is a footballer who can play at both ends.

Will free up Waite to play forward and exploit their backline.

Setanta is behind Austin, Thornton, Bower, Jamison and Waite as a defender.

And Kreuzer, Warnock, Jacobs and Hampson as a ruckman.

Deadwood.



Hartlett shouldnt be played in defence.
He is a forward... and nothing else...

He doesnt have closing speed...

And with Jameson, T Bird,Austin,Waite,Bower and Setanta we should be teaching him the art of making forward space and kicking goals...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:02 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:02 am
Posts: 629
Im a bit shocked that Fisher is being touted as a possible in. I've only seen him in last weeks game for the bullants, but from that and all the reports, I'm a bit perplexed he is being looked at as an In. Maybe Harts in the forward line. Would like to see Browne get a run, but unlikely. Glad if Robinson is back in.

_________________
Chris Judd: 'I've since watched some Steven Seagal movies and realise pressure points are no laughing matter.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Nicko Carstairs wrote:
Im a bit shocked that Fisher is being touted as a possible in. I've only seen him in last weeks game for the bullants, but from that and all the reports, I'm a bit perplexed he is being looked at as an In. Maybe Harts in the forward line. Would like to see Browne get a run, but unlikely. Glad if Robinson is back in.



Just more of the Ratts clutching at straws syndrome.
We have little defensive pressure in our forward line and were going to bring in maybe Fisher this week.

Fish is good when you have a balanced forward line structure cos he can add something different.
In this current structure he will be exposed big time....!!!

Plus he does nothing to add to our inaccuracy... and Ratts is on record saying thats a problem...

I actually think were not accurate cos were indirect... but what would i know???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:18 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
ryan2000 wrote:
IF Hartlett does come on and be the player we all hope(d) he'd be, then good on him - i'll be very happy.

Feel sorry for him with his bad run of injuries.

But the fact is, i don't think he has shown any type of decent form to warrant a place in the seniors.

As a defender - i'd much rather Setanta.
As a forward - i'd prefer Cloke (believe it or not) or perhaps even throwing Austin up there.

Hartlett for mine just hasn't shown enough. And despite the fact he was mentioned in the best last weekend, i think Robbo was one of the only ones who played like he was above the level of standards in the VFL. Crap Crap games.............. Just cause he's featured in the best doesn't mean he's worthy of a recall.

YES - He has a thumping kick and a good strong body and can take a mark - but so could Chris Bryan! He's hardly setting the world on fire.

Again........... good luck to Hartlett. But i just don't see him in out best 22 at the moment and haven't for a while.


Look from one angle what you say is spot on.

But, what else is there other than VFL and the other players on our list? We can't just pluck a gun young tall from nowhere. We have finite supply and the players we have now some are not performing so change is arguably a necessity.

We need to release Waite, unless we wait for Warnock to come in and then maybe we release Kruezer forward.

I am not hugely confident on Harts, but I reckon he deserves another shot. I wouldn't feel that way if it wasn't for his kicking. It was brilliant last weekend. Give him a go as a sweeper and kicker, might not work but hey, we're not going to go all the way this year so let's see what he can offer.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:21 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Synbad wrote:
Nicko Carstairs wrote:
Im a bit shocked that Fisher is being touted as a possible in. I've only seen him in last weeks game for the bullants, but from that and all the reports, I'm a bit perplexed he is being looked at as an In. Maybe Harts in the forward line. Would like to see Browne get a run, but unlikely. Glad if Robinson is back in.



Just more of the Ratts clutching at straws syndrome.
We have little defensive pressure in our forward line and were going to bring in maybe Fisher this week.

Fish is good when you have a balanced forward line structure cos he can add something different.
In this current structure he will be exposed big time....!!!

Plus he does nothing to add to our inaccuracy... and Ratts is on record saying thats a problem...

I actually think were not accurate cos were indirect... but what would i know???


Yes I don't know about Fish and agree chopping and changing every week is often a sign of clutching at straws.

It's like we think 'Hey he could take a grab and he has done OK in the past', but then 3 weeks after we bring him in we will probably remember why he shouldn't have been in, because he is too slow to chase and his field kicking is dubious.

Now you could say the same applies to Harts, and I tend to agree to an extent, but with Harts at least he hasn't had many chances in the past largely due to injury, so maybe he is in a slightly different category.

Again though, don't mistake my support for Harts as over confidence, certainly not very confident at all, just reckon in the modern game kicking is crucial, up there with speed, and he at least has the first base covered (Cloke has neither, just size).

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:26 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Synbad wrote:
Kouta wrote:
Indie wrote:
So you can't see why talk of bringing in Harts to play in defence would bring up another tall who has demonstrated that he can play on power forwards? Amazing ...

And has Harts been doing the Waite-style sweeper role in the Bullants? To my eye, he's been doing a garden-variety fullback role. But perhaps you could explain what it is that you've seen in the Bulllants that would give you confidence he could be a sweeper.

What's wrong with Hartlett playing CHB against Rocca this week?

Your obsession with Setanta is over the top and illogical.

Hartlett can kick 60 metres and is a footballer who can play at both ends.

Will free up Waite to play forward and exploit their backline.

Setanta is behind Austin, Thornton, Bower, Jamison and Waite as a defender.

And Kreuzer, Warnock, Jacobs and Hampson as a ruckman.

Deadwood.



Hartlett shouldnt be played in defence.
He is a forward... and nothing else...

He doesnt have closing speed...

And with Jameson, T Bird,Austin,Waite,Bower and Setanta we should be teaching him the art of making forward space and kicking goals...


The other thing is sometimes players need to develop down back first, to learn the flow of the game, but also to develop confidence.

Kouta spoke about this the other night, how he went to CHB and how that changed his career immensely, and how Tarrant has gone back for great rewards.

Suspect with Harts it would be just as much about confidence as it is about smarts.

BTW, I recall a game 1-2 years ago in the VFL where Harts played loose down back and he had it on a string. So maybe just maybe he does have the nous for that role (but not the pace).

And, last week IIRC Goose tore us apart then Harts went onto him and Goose kicked maybe only 1 more goal, so he did OK in stopping the big fella who was on fire and is a proven senior level performer. So maybe he can hold the big but not overly quick forwards (Rocca).

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Virgin Blue wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
IF Hartlett does come on and be the player we all hope(d) he'd be, then good on him - i'll be very happy.

Feel sorry for him with his bad run of injuries.

But the fact is, i don't think he has shown any type of decent form to warrant a place in the seniors.

As a defender - i'd much rather Setanta.
As a forward - i'd prefer Cloke (believe it or not) or perhaps even throwing Austin up there.

Hartlett for mine just hasn't shown enough. And despite the fact he was mentioned in the best last weekend, i think Robbo was one of the only ones who played like he was above the level of standards in the VFL. Crap Crap games.............. Just cause he's featured in the best doesn't mean he's worthy of a recall.

YES - He has a thumping kick and a good strong body and can take a mark - but so could Chris Bryan! He's hardly setting the world on fire.

Again........... good luck to Hartlett. But i just don't see him in out best 22 at the moment and haven't for a while.


Look from one angle what you say is spot on.

But, what else is there other than VFL and the other players on our list? We can't just pluck a gun young tall from nowhere. We have finite supply and the players we have now some are not performing so change is arguably a necessity.

We need to release Waite, unless we wait for Warnock to come in and then maybe we release Kruezer forward.

I am not hugely confident on Harts, but I reckon he deserves another shot. I wouldn't feel that way if it wasn't for his kicking. It was brilliant last weekend. Give him a go as a sweeper and kicker, might not work but hey, we're not going to go all the way this year so let's see what he can offer.



Thats all we need another 'sweeper'....

We have more sweepers than the Melbourne City Council ....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 521 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 27  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group