Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 5:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 236 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Fev isnt the probem why we cant structure.. planning is... :lol:


How can we snare 3 very good forwards if we pay one very good forward the price of 3 very good forwards???


WC won a premiersp and played off for another preiershipwithout having one good forward....

.. now im not saying we should be playing off for a premiership... im saying we have one good forward which is better than no good forwards.. but we dont know how to use the space for him and others...

in case people dont understand wy we did what we did....

.. its because we dont have answers....

.......and we dont have aNswers cos we arent drilled...

.... and we arent drilled cos were playing without proper planning ......


.... that planning is worked on pre season and weekdays......


... we dont run hard....
.. we dont work for each other.....

... and if you want to be a good side you must be drilled in what everyone should be doing not only when u have the ball.. but when you dont......!!!!

the game is played all over the ground at any moment.... its not just played at the end the ball is .. and with whoever has his hands on the ball...

players must know when to run forward when to run back... when to make space.. where to kick the ball... and how to open up a passageway for the ballrunner.. the ball user and the intended targets...

.. those intended targets are options a) b)c) d) e) etc....

.. and theyre not just forwards but link players...!!!.. carriers of the footy to project the ball from position A.. wherever that is on the ground at any given moment.. to position B.. C...D...and so on.. towards an effective avenue to goal....regardless of how the opposition defece is set up...

that only comesd with imagination and planning.. and then execution.... and if you practice it enough.. it will be obvious its happening.. and eventually it will be executed effectively...!!!

thats what i wanna see...

now if it takes games or a year or so... thats ok...

bt there must be evidence of it....!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
Synbad wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Fev isnt the probem why we cant structure.. planning is... :lol:


How can we snare 3 very good forwards if we pay one very good forward the price of 3 very good forwards???


WC won a premiersp and played off for another preiershipwithout having one good forward....

.. now im not saying we should be playing off for a premiership... im saying we have one good forward which is better than no good forwards.. but we dont know how to use the space for him and others...

in case people dont understand wy we did what we did....

.. its because we dont have answers....

.......and we dont have aNswers cos we arent drilled...

.... and we arent drilled cos were playing without proper planning ......


.... that planning is worked on pre season and weekdays......


... we dont run hard....
.. we dont work for each other.....

... and if you want to be a good side you must be drilled in what everyone should be doing not only when u have the ball.. but when you dont......!!!!

the game is played all over the ground at any moment.... its not just played at the end the ball is .. and with whoever has his hands on the ball...

players must know when to run forward when to run back... when to make space.. where to kick the ball... and how to open up a passageway for the ballrunner.. the ball user and the intended targets...

.. those intended targets are options a) b)c) d) e) etc....

.. and theyre not just forwards but link players...!!!.. carriers of the footy to project the ball from position A.. wherever that is on the ground at any given moment.. to position B.. C...D...and so on.. towards an effective avenue to goal....regardless of how the opposition defece is set up...

that only comesd with imagination and planning.. and then execution.... and if you practice it enough.. it will be obvious its happening.. and eventually it will be executed effectively...!!!

thats what i wanna see...

now if it takes games or a year or so... thats ok...

bt there must be evidence of it....!!!


Please continue ....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:28 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
Simple answer to the original question yes Pagan could have coached worse because he coached like crap for 5 years :roll:
Some of the worst games of football everplayed were under Pagan's leadership.
Pagan < Ratten


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:30 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 976
its obvious that rattan is heavily influenced by david parkin...and he was the man.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:34 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
blue4 wrote:
its obvious that rattan is heavily influenced by david parkin...and he was the man.


Very true, the way we play is definitely a continuation of the Parko/Britts era.

Remember as crap as we were in 2002 we only lost 2 games by over 10 goals.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:14 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Gibbs would probably still be in the back pocket

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:09 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
doofdoof wrote:
Synbad wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Fev isnt the probem why we cant structure.. planning is... :lol:


How can we snare 3 very good forwards if we pay one very good forward the price of 3 very good forwards???


WC won a premiersp and played off for another preiershipwithout having one good forward....

.. now im not saying we should be playing off for a premiership... im saying we have one good forward which is better than no good forwards.. but we dont know how to use the space for him and others...

in case people dont understand wy we did what we did....

.. its because we dont have answers....

.......and we dont have aNswers cos we arent drilled...

.... and we arent drilled cos were playing without proper planning ......


.... that planning is worked on pre season and weekdays......


... we dont run hard....
.. we dont work for each other.....

... and if you want to be a good side you must be drilled in what everyone should be doing not only when u have the ball.. but when you dont......!!!!

the game is played all over the ground at any moment.... its not just played at the end the ball is .. and with whoever has his hands on the ball...

players must know when to run forward when to run back... when to make space.. where to kick the ball... and how to open up a passageway for the ballrunner.. the ball user and the intended targets...

.. those intended targets are options a) b)c) d) e) etc....

.. and theyre not just forwards but link players...!!!.. carriers of the footy to project the ball from position A.. wherever that is on the ground at any given moment.. to position B.. C...D...and so on.. towards an effective avenue to goal....regardless of how the opposition defece is set up...

that only comesd with imagination and planning.. and then execution.... and if you practice it enough.. it will be obvious its happening.. and eventually it will be executed effectively...!!!

thats what i wanna see...

now if it takes games or a year or so... thats ok...

bt there must be evidence of it....!!!


Please continue ....



Well the tempo football was thrown out the door...

... and we used KReuzer and not just Fev...

,,,, imagination......... wasnt it???


:wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:17 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
Synbad wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Synbad wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Fev isnt the probem why we cant structure.. planning is... :lol:


How can we snare 3 very good forwards if we pay one very good forward the price of 3 very good forwards???


WC won a premiersp and played off for another preiershipwithout having one good forward....

.. now im not saying we should be playing off for a premiership... im saying we have one good forward which is better than no good forwards.. but we dont know how to use the space for him and others...

in case people dont understand wy we did what we did....

.. its because we dont have answers....

.......and we dont have aNswers cos we arent drilled...

.... and we arent drilled cos were playing without proper planning ......


.... that planning is worked on pre season and weekdays......


... we dont run hard....
.. we dont work for each other.....

... and if you want to be a good side you must be drilled in what everyone should be doing not only when u have the ball.. but when you dont......!!!!

the game is played all over the ground at any moment.... its not just played at the end the ball is .. and with whoever has his hands on the ball...

players must know when to run forward when to run back... when to make space.. where to kick the ball... and how to open up a passageway for the ballrunner.. the ball user and the intended targets...

.. those intended targets are options a) b)c) d) e) etc....

.. and theyre not just forwards but link players...!!!.. carriers of the footy to project the ball from position A.. wherever that is on the ground at any given moment.. to position B.. C...D...and so on.. towards an effective avenue to goal....regardless of how the opposition defece is set up...

that only comesd with imagination and planning.. and then execution.... and if you practice it enough.. it will be obvious its happening.. and eventually it will be executed effectively...!!!

thats what i wanna see...

now if it takes games or a year or so... thats ok...

bt there must be evidence of it....!!!


Please continue ....



Well the tempo football was thrown out the door...

... and we used KReuzer and not just Fev...

,,,, imagination......... wasnt it???


:wink:




BUDDA BING!!!!! :wink:

He shoots.

He scores.

And that's the ball game.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:34 am 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4775
More importantly we tried different things when its not working. You cannot have only one style of play these days, different game plans for different teams takes out the predictability.

Some times they work and sometimes it doesn't.

Geez I was pleased by last night, once we have another forward to help out Fev, look out......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Wow!
Some of you are rapt we didnt get done by 100 points.
We would have if it wernt tfor Juddy...

If only Pagan had Judd....

You cant compare us to teams that lost by 100 points... you must look at whats ahead of us to be a good side..

Not just to you synbad but to all others who have been ranting - if we had played well and were properly coached, what margin would you have expected? - and what margin will you be expecting for the port game?

For some reason, I'm expecting the generic - we need to see signs of improvement rather than any definitive statements. I'll preempt such responses by saying that I've seen plenty of gradual improvement throughout this season and signs of progress by our youngsters. If you cant, perhaps its because you refuse to do so (ie have unrealistic expectations)


Ok its noit about the margin or the win / loss.. its about the fundamentals...

Any blocking or shepherding??? Nope
Talk???nope
Structures??? nope!!!
Linking up???? Nope!!!

Just cos we have Judd doewsnt mean he is coaching better than Pagan.. does it???

We lack the fundamentals a team needs to go forward..

Theyre gut busting runs...
cohesion....
defensiveness

etc.....

Take Judd out of that soide and it IS 100 points....

So forget about wins and losses ... its about a team across the bpoard effort on the field and coaching...

Look at Collingwoood...!!!!

You cant say thgeyre older.... or more skilled can u???

But if they lose players numbers 12/14/ and 16 one week and bring in players numbers 35/ 36/37 .. those npo name players still fit in dont they????


They all run hard.. they all tackle and when its thgeir turn to put their heads over the balkl they will...

BUT..... they also play to a plan/... dont they???



Bump

Well synbad I looked at collingwood today - how do you think their plan went

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:39 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
We should sack Ratten............ :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:42 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Yeah piss him off............ LOL!


I must admit....... i don't like how we continually play the flanks for 3qtrs and then run it through the centre in the last qtr as we have been doing for the past 3 or 4 games but.....shit,..... it's working so i should just shut my mouth and let Ratten do his shit!

If it ain't broke......

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sydney Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Wow!
Some of you are rapt we didnt get done by 100 points.
We would have if it wernt tfor Juddy...

If only Pagan had Judd....

You cant compare us to teams that lost by 100 points... you must look at whats ahead of us to be a good side..

Not just to you synbad but to all others who have been ranting - if we had played well and were properly coached, what margin would you have expected? - and what margin will you be expecting for the port game?

For some reason, I'm expecting the generic - we need to see signs of improvement rather than any definitive statements. I'll preempt such responses by saying that I've seen plenty of gradual improvement throughout this season and signs of progress by our youngsters. If you cant, perhaps its because you refuse to do so (ie have unrealistic expectations)


Ok its noit about the margin or the win / loss.. its about the fundamentals...

Any blocking or shepherding??? Nope
Talk???nope
Structures??? nope!!!
Linking up???? Nope!!!

Just cos we have Judd doewsnt mean he is coaching better than Pagan.. does it???

We lack the fundamentals a team needs to go forward..

Theyre gut busting runs...
cohesion....
defensiveness

etc.....

Take Judd out of that soide and it IS 100 points....

So forget about wins and losses ... its about a team across the bpoard effort on the field and coaching...

Look at Collingwoood...!!!!

You cant say thgeyre older.... or more skilled can u???

But if they lose players numbers 12/14/ and 16 one week and bring in players numbers 35/ 36/37 .. those npo name players still fit in dont they????


They all run hard.. they all tackle and when its thgeir turn to put their heads over the balkl they will...

BUT..... they also play to a plan/... dont they???



Bump

Well synbad I looked at collingwood today - how do you think their plan went



Ill tell you what.. give Fev and Judd to Collinwgwood and ill let u know???

The argument is this Sydney Blue.. coz i dont think you really understand stuff.... no matter what it is.. you have a very simple understanding.

Its about a coach and what he can extract out of what he has...

For instance....

How many absolute stars has Collingwood got?????

How do they go on the ladder with what they have????

Malthouse polishes a turd.. but its still a turd...
Player for player they dont compare...

Ratts has more to work with... PLUS the best full forward in the country.. (yes i know.. you think hes shit).. and the best player in the country overall...


And since we spoke about how we were paying.... he has changed our style... :wink:

(maybe he reads TC) :-D

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Synbad, Malthouse doesn't polish the turd, he just rolls it in glitter.

It's still a turd though.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:50 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Malthouse is indeed a top coach. That side is playing well above their capabilities............ and they look confident doing it too.

But, Ratten, like our list, is a young coach and is only gonna learn with experience.

At the halfway point, i'd put ratten on about 6.5 out of 10. Maybe a 7.

Like Synbad said, he has the best player in the AFL (albeit a half fit best player in the AFL), the best forward in the AFL (maybe 2nd best ATM), and at least half a dozen very talented young kids who are willing to give it their all!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:42 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Got to remember this is a very new side playing together, which is why they have been improving constanrly over the season. We know we have more talent than the Pies, and its just beginning to be tapped.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 236 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group