Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Sep 17, 2025 7:49 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2355 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112 ... 118  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 8:37 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10772
Well said Syd


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 10:37 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 5037
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Interesting listening to Michael Voss and Sam Docherty giving interviews over the past 24 hours.
Firstly, Voss talks about the club making a decision to move on from the players who had durability issues at the end of last year. No doubt those players provided skill and value when on the park but they didn't get on the park often enough.
Then there was the decision to take Jagga. HOF and the Campo's instead of taking Houston and topping up with other experienced bodies. (Although Haynes was as experienced as any pick up)

Then you listen to Docherty. The feeling I get is that some of the players wanted to top up with senior bodies and have a tilt at the flag. He talks about some sections of the club not being on the same page. The question of players feeling "valued".
SB has spoken a few times this year about the club cutting too deep. It sounds like some of the senior players felt the same way.
Docherty infers that he wasn't on the page of getting Jagga and questions list management decisions. He also infers that well run clubs don't lose players.

Out of all the info provided, I'm glad the club did what it did. As Voss says, all decisions going forward are with a Carlton first attitude. If the senior players don't like it. @#$%&! them. Sustained success should always be the goal.
You won't get sustained success if you continue to go into rebuild mode.
It limits your ability to retain players and limits your ability to attract players.
The list decisions made last year have moved the club so far away from premiership success it is likely we will not make the 8 for years.

The players know it and some are walking.
Players want a chance at success Austin took that away from them and you only have to look at clubs like Collingwood Geelong and Sydney who play finals every year they very rarely lose players and always attract players.
The younger players at Carlton are 4 to 5 years away from competing with the best.
Established players will not hang around and wait. If we had kept 3 of the players we got rid of last year we may have had the depth to make finals again. We lacked endurance in back half of games which was brought about by players who have not done the body of work to see out games.
We also put younger players at the risk of injuries.
If we made the finals this year players would have been less inclined to walk and we would have been a more attractive proposition for players from other clubs.

I stated back in November last year that this had disaster written all over it.

It's a long way back from here

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

I think you're overrating Matt Kennedy and underrating Harry O'Farrell.
Owies is a fringe player at West Coast.

_________________
'The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it'
H.L. Mencken


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 11:46 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3295
Humpers wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Interesting listening to Michael Voss and Sam Docherty giving interviews over the past 24 hours.
Firstly, Voss talks about the club making a decision to move on from the players who had durability issues at the end of last year. No doubt those players provided skill and value when on the park but they didn't get on the park often enough.
Then there was the decision to take Jagga. HOF and the Campo's instead of taking Houston and topping up with other experienced bodies. (Although Haynes was as experienced as any pick up)

Then you listen to Docherty. The feeling I get is that some of the players wanted to top up with senior bodies and have a tilt at the flag. He talks about some sections of the club not being on the same page. The question of players feeling "valued".
SB has spoken a few times this year about the club cutting too deep. It sounds like some of the senior players felt the same way.
Docherty infers that he wasn't on the page of getting Jagga and questions list management decisions. He also infers that well run clubs don't lose players.

Out of all the info provided, I'm glad the club did what it did. As Voss says, all decisions going forward are with a Carlton first attitude. If the senior players don't like it. @#$%&! them. Sustained success should always be the goal.
You won't get sustained success if you continue to go into rebuild mode.
It limits your ability to retain players and limits your ability to attract players.
The list decisions made last year have moved the club so far away from premiership success it is likely we will not make the 8 for years.

The players know it and some are walking.
Players want a chance at success Austin took that away from them and you only have to look at clubs like Collingwood Geelong and Sydney who play finals every year they very rarely lose players and always attract players.
The younger players at Carlton are 4 to 5 years away from competing with the best.
Established players will not hang around and wait. If we had kept 3 of the players we got rid of last year we may have had the depth to make finals again. We lacked endurance in back half of games which was brought about by players who have not done the body of work to see out games.
We also put younger players at the risk of injuries.
If we made the finals this year players would have been less inclined to walk and we would have been a more attractive proposition for players from other clubs.

I stated back in November last year that this had disaster written all over it.

It's a long way back from here

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

I think you're overrating Matt Kennedy and underrating Harry O'Farrell.
Owies is a fringe player at West Coast.

And you’re underestimating the quality of some of our kids


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 11:46 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3295
Humpers wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Interesting listening to Michael Voss and Sam Docherty giving interviews over the past 24 hours.
Firstly, Voss talks about the club making a decision to move on from the players who had durability issues at the end of last year. No doubt those players provided skill and value when on the park but they didn't get on the park often enough.
Then there was the decision to take Jagga. HOF and the Campo's instead of taking Houston and topping up with other experienced bodies. (Although Haynes was as experienced as any pick up)

Then you listen to Docherty. The feeling I get is that some of the players wanted to top up with senior bodies and have a tilt at the flag. He talks about some sections of the club not being on the same page. The question of players feeling "valued".
SB has spoken a few times this year about the club cutting too deep. It sounds like some of the senior players felt the same way.
Docherty infers that he wasn't on the page of getting Jagga and questions list management decisions. He also infers that well run clubs don't lose players.

Out of all the info provided, I'm glad the club did what it did. As Voss says, all decisions going forward are with a Carlton first attitude. If the senior players don't like it. @#$%&! them. Sustained success should always be the goal.
You won't get sustained success if you continue to go into rebuild mode.
It limits your ability to retain players and limits your ability to attract players.
The list decisions made last year have moved the club so far away from premiership success it is likely we will not make the 8 for years.

The players know it and some are walking.
Players want a chance at success Austin took that away from them and you only have to look at clubs like Collingwood Geelong and Sydney who play finals every year they very rarely lose players and always attract players.
The younger players at Carlton are 4 to 5 years away from competing with the best.
Established players will not hang around and wait. If we had kept 3 of the players we got rid of last year we may have had the depth to make finals again. We lacked endurance in back half of games which was brought about by players who have not done the body of work to see out games.
We also put younger players at the risk of injuries.
If we made the finals this year players would have been less inclined to walk and we would have been a more attractive proposition for players from other clubs.

I stated back in November last year that this had disaster written all over it.

It's a long way back from here

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

I think you're overrating Matt Kennedy and underrating Harry O'Farrell.
Owies is a fringe player at West Coast.

And you’re underestimating the quality of some of our kids


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 12:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18200
london blue wrote:
And you’re underestimating the quality of some of our kids


i'm not sure where that comes from. :?
Underestimating? It sounds to me that Humpers rates HOF highly.

I'd love to know who these players are that robbed our team of the chance of success. Kennedy is the only one who has had a consistent year elsewhere and most posters believed he couldn't play midfield in our side with Cripps, George etc.

It seems to me Doc and SOS knew the players coming in over the next couple of years would take their spots so they saw the writing on the wall.
The noise coming out of the playing group recently makes them sound like an entitled, pampered bunch of sooks. They had their opportunity. 5 goals up in a prelim and went to water. The club gave them another year and the result was similar. Too many players unable to put together a consistent block of footy. Cuningham, Marchbank, Martin etc. They could have still been on the list and still not being fit enough to step in when we had injuries.
The decision to replenish seems right to me. As Voss said, it's a reset, not a rebuild. We'll be competing strongly for the 8 next season IMHO.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 12:37 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3295
Blue Vain wrote:
london blue wrote:
And you’re underestimating the quality of some of our kids


i'm not sure where that comes from. :?
Underestimating? It sounds to me that Humpers rates HOF highly.

I'd love to know who these players are that robbed our team of the chance of success. Kennedy is the only one who has had a consistent year elsewhere and most posters believed he couldn't play midfield in our side with Cripps, George etc.

It seems to me Doc and SOS knew the players coming in over the next couple of years would take their spots so they saw the writing on the wall.
The noise coming out of the playing group recently makes them sound like an entitled, pampered bunch of sooks. They had their opportunity. 5 goals up in a prelim and went to water. The club gave them another year and the result was similar. Too many players unable to put together a consistent block of footy. Cuningham, Marchbank, Martin etc. They could have still been on the list and still not being fit enough to step in when we had injuries.
The decision to replenish seems right to me. As Voss said, it's a reset, not a rebuild. We'll be competing strongly for the 8 next season IMHO.

All good BV, was referring to SB’s comment that our young fellas were 4 to 5 years away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 12:38 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10434
Location: Coburg
surely blind Freddy could see we needed run and we needed players that were not injury prone ( then of course we get 2 knees an Achilles and whatever Newman had) - given those needs I thought we drafted well (except for the plethora of small forwards) and have begin to address the needs that we all knew were there.

Without that redress we may have played finals again and lost finals again - with the redress who knows we may actually be building towards a GF.

I am excited about Jagga
I loved what i saw of HOF
Like Skull
Carroll and Wilson give us run and ball use
2 Campo boys will add to this side
Lord keeps getting better
add Dean and whoever else

fingers crossed with Walker and we may just have a side that can go all the way.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 1:22 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7544
SurreyBlue wrote:
MPH78 wrote:
For mine, it is just more evidence that we are so far from an elite professional sporting organisation it’s not funny.

Can only hope that this is finally a true line in the sand and culture reset we desperately need.


If the standards aren’t set by the hierarchy, then it’s every man for himself.
We’ve had so many admins, coaches and presidents but not one has set the expectation.
I don’t blame the players for being who they are. That’s what they know and have received no standards.
Doesn’t surprise me that some have jumped ship and others are thinking, as they have no confidence in our club.
Let’s hope Wright gets it right but at what cost? IMO. I hope he is prepared to work and build what we have instead of detonating and starting again.

The fog of the 2025 season is finally clearing and we're discovering the massive disconnect between the football department and the players.

As Doc said, the players were expecting a tilt at the flag and wanted top ups to help them achieve it... whereas the FD entered a semi rebuild phase. If or how well that was communicated to the group is unknown and it's easy to say @#$%&! the players wanting to leave... I was one of them. But it's clear we're not a very well run or coached club, and their (players) time in the game is short. If you look at it from that context, how can you not expect them to explore other opportunities.

As for us fans... we enter another 'fingers crossed' phase of our CFC supporting journey.
It will be long and most definitely include a coaching change (or three)... and more player movements.

But this time it will be different, right?........ right?

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 1:38 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 8107
Location: Bendigo
Players wanted to top up?

OK then. All you blokes on $800k plus, we’ll need the ‘plus’ back from each of you.

Get you topped right up. Top you up real good.

Give me a spell…

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 1:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15156
Blue Vain wrote:
Interesting listening to Michael Voss and Sam Docherty giving interviews over the past 24 hours.
Firstly, Voss talks about the club making a decision to move on from the players who had durability issues at the end of last year. No doubt those players provided skill and value when on the park but they didn't get on the park often enough.
Then there was the decision to take Jagga. HOF and the Campo's instead of taking Houston and topping up with other experienced bodies. (Although Haynes was as experienced as any pick up)

Then you listen to Docherty. The feeling I get is that some of the players wanted to top up with senior bodies and have a tilt at the flag. He talks about some sections of the club not being on the same page. The question of players feeling "valued".
SB has spoken a few times this year about the club cutting too deep. It sounds like some of the senior players felt the same way.
Docherty infers that he wasn't on the page of getting Jagga and questions list management decisions. He also infers that well run clubs don't lose players.

Out of all the info provided, I'm glad the club did what it did. As Voss says, all decisions going forward are with a Carlton first attitude. If the senior players don't like it. @#$%&! them. Sustained success should always be the goal.

I found that interview intersting too.
It sounds like the senior players, or some players, thought they were close to a flag and only had to top up with a couple of players.
Who knows who is right here. I felt like we had a pretty good list and weren't far off it and was a bit surprised that we traded away some decent players such as Kennedy and depth players in recent years. Our depth was challenged again this season when we got the inevitable injuries.
Clearly there has been a disconnect between the club and players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 1:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18200
london blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
london blue wrote:
And you’re underestimating the quality of some of our kids


i'm not sure where that comes from. :?
Underestimating? It sounds to me that Humpers rates HOF highly.

I'd love to know who these players are that robbed our team of the chance of success. Kennedy is the only one who has had a consistent year elsewhere and most posters believed he couldn't play midfield in our side with Cripps, George etc.

It seems to me Doc and SOS knew the players coming in over the next couple of years would take their spots so they saw the writing on the wall.
The noise coming out of the playing group recently makes them sound like an entitled, pampered bunch of sooks. They had their opportunity. 5 goals up in a prelim and went to water. The club gave them another year and the result was similar. Too many players unable to put together a consistent block of footy. Cuningham, Marchbank, Martin etc. They could have still been on the list and still not being fit enough to step in when we had injuries.
The decision to replenish seems right to me. As Voss said, it's a reset, not a rebuild. We'll be competing strongly for the 8 next season IMHO.

All good BV, was referring to SB’s comment that our young fellas were 4 to 5 years away


:thumbsup:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 1:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10544
Location: Australia
kezza wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Interesting listening to Michael Voss and Sam Docherty giving interviews over the past 24 hours.
Firstly, Voss talks about the club making a decision to move on from the players who had durability issues at the end of last year. No doubt those players provided skill and value when on the park but they didn't get on the park often enough.
Then there was the decision to take Jagga. HOF and the Campo's instead of taking Houston and topping up with other experienced bodies. (Although Haynes was as experienced as any pick up)

Then you listen to Docherty. The feeling I get is that some of the players wanted to top up with senior bodies and have a tilt at the flag. He talks about some sections of the club not being on the same page. The question of players feeling "valued".
SB has spoken a few times this year about the club cutting too deep. It sounds like some of the senior players felt the same way.
Docherty infers that he wasn't on the page of getting Jagga and questions list management decisions. He also infers that well run clubs don't lose players.

Out of all the info provided, I'm glad the club did what it did. As Voss says, all decisions going forward are with a Carlton first attitude. If the senior players don't like it. @#$%&! them. Sustained success should always be the goal.

I found that interview intersting too.
It sounds like the senior players, or some players, thought they were close to a flag and only had to top up with a couple of players.
Who knows who is right here. I felt like we had a pretty good list and weren't far off it and was a bit surprised that we traded away some decent players such as Kennedy and depth players in recent years. Our depth was challenged again this season when we got the inevitable injuries.
Clearly there has been a disconnect between the club and players.


Docherty doesn’t say anything like this in the “full” interview posted on the Carlton website, was all this edited out? Where is this “uncut” version that people are referring to?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 2:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21743
Location: North of the border
Blue Vain wrote:
london blue wrote:
And you’re underestimating the quality of some of our kids


i'm not sure where that comes from. :?
Underestimating? It sounds to me that Humpers rates HOF highly.

I'd love to know who these players are that robbed our team of the chance of success. Kennedy is the only one who has had a consistent year elsewhere and most posters believed he couldn't play midfield in our side with Cripps, George etc.

It seems to me Doc and SOS knew the players coming in over the next couple of years would take their spots so they saw the writing on the wall.
The noise coming out of the playing group recently makes them sound like an entitled, pampered bunch of sooks. They had their opportunity. 5 goals up in a prelim and went to water. The club gave them another year and the result was similar. Too many players unable to put together a consistent block of footy. Cuningham, Marchbank, Martin etc. They could have still been on the list and still not being fit enough to step in when we had injuries.
The decision to replenish seems right to me. As Voss said, it's a reset, not a rebuild. We'll be competing strongly for the 8 next season IMHO.
We won't get any where near breaking into the 8 next year.
We needed a sustainable run at playing finals.
6 to 7 years straight then become a regular finals contender.
If you think we are having a mini reset and will pop again next year you are dreaming.
There are teams that will go past us at a rate of knots.
Danny said blind Freddie could see we needed speed who apart from Jagga did they bring in that was quick.

They stuffed it .23 games from Kennedy 23 from Owies who kicked more goals last year than any player did this year.
And even if you got a dozen from either Marchbank Carroll Cunningham or Martin we would have been better off.
We lost 2 first year players to ACL they should have been learning in the seconds
And we sat and watched Lord White Carroll Cowan HOK struggle to put 4 quarters together. All started games well be faded in last 2 quarters.
The club thought they would keep there best 23 on the park and like most years it turned to shit.

They screwed up.

These young players we blooded this year are a few years away from competing with the best. We can't seriously expect Cowan to match up on a Raynor or Elliot.
We can't expect Carroll to take a Gunston like players and we can't expect Lord and Jagga to compete with Rowell Anderson Serong Butters Neale etc etc
These players will need time to develop.
They have now missed a window because they didn't have 27 to 28 AFL ready players on the list. 17 under 21 is to many
6 aged 22 to 25 is to few

Poor list management

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 4:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10434
Location: Coburg
Crusader wrote:
Players wanted to top up?

OK then. All you blokes on $800k plus, we’ll need the ‘plus’ back from each of you.

Get you topped right up. Top you up real good.

Give me a spell…


exactly, @#$%&! me - life is short but also you know a million a year please.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 4:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18200
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
london blue wrote:
And you’re underestimating the quality of some of our kids


i'm not sure where that comes from. :?
Underestimating? It sounds to me that Humpers rates HOF highly.

I'd love to know who these players are that robbed our team of the chance of success. Kennedy is the only one who has had a consistent year elsewhere and most posters believed he couldn't play midfield in our side with Cripps, George etc.

It seems to me Doc and SOS knew the players coming in over the next couple of years would take their spots so they saw the writing on the wall.
The noise coming out of the playing group recently makes them sound like an entitled, pampered bunch of sooks. They had their opportunity. 5 goals up in a prelim and went to water. The club gave them another year and the result was similar. Too many players unable to put together a consistent block of footy. Cuningham, Marchbank, Martin etc. They could have still been on the list and still not being fit enough to step in when we had injuries.
The decision to replenish seems right to me. As Voss said, it's a reset, not a rebuild. We'll be competing strongly for the 8 next season IMHO.
We won't get any where near breaking into the 8 next year.
We needed a sustainable run at playing finals.
6 to 7 years straight then become a regular finals contender.
If you think we are having a mini reset and will pop again next year you are dreaming.
There are teams that will go past us at a rate of knots.
Danny said blind Freddie could see we needed speed who apart from Jagga did they bring in that was quick.

They stuffed it .23 games from Kennedy 23 from Owies who kicked more goals last year than any player did this year.
And even if you got a dozen from either Marchbank Carroll Cunningham or Martin we would have been better off.



That's exactly what they had last year and they fell into an elimination final and got flogged. :?
Why would things suddenly change? The club made the right decision. They gave this group 2 opportunities in finals and they weren't up to a premiership. Reset and let the spine of Weiters, Harry, Cripps etc have another shot.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 5:30 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21743
Location: North of the border
Blue Vain wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
london blue wrote:
And you’re underestimating the quality of some of our kids


i'm not sure where that comes from. :?
Underestimating? It sounds to me that Humpers rates HOF highly.

I'd love to know who these players are that robbed our team of the chance of success. Kennedy is the only one who has had a consistent year elsewhere and most posters believed he couldn't play midfield in our side with Cripps, George etc.

It seems to me Doc and SOS knew the players coming in over the next couple of years would take their spots so they saw the writing on the wall.
The noise coming out of the playing group recently makes them sound like an entitled, pampered bunch of sooks. They had their opportunity. 5 goals up in a prelim and went to water. The club gave them another year and the result was similar. Too many players unable to put together a consistent block of footy. Cuningham, Marchbank, Martin etc. They could have still been on the list and still not being fit enough to step in when we had injuries.
The decision to replenish seems right to me. As Voss said, it's a reset, not a rebuild. We'll be competing strongly for the 8 next season IMHO.
We won't get any where near breaking into the 8 next year.
We needed a sustainable run at playing finals.
6 to 7 years straight then become a regular finals contender.
If you think we are having a mini reset and will pop again next year you are dreaming.
There are teams that will go past us at a rate of knots.
Danny said blind Freddie could see we needed speed who apart from Jagga did they bring in that was quick.

They stuffed it .23 games from Kennedy 23 from Owies who kicked more goals last year than any player did this year.
And even if you got a dozen from either Marchbank Carroll Cunningham or Martin we would have been better off.



That's exactly what they had last year and they fell into an elimination final and got flogged. :?
Why would things suddenly change? The club made the right decision. They gave this group 2 opportunities in finals and they weren't up to a premiership. Reset and let the spine of Weiters, Harry, Cripps etc have another shot.
Brisbane had 5 opportunities
Swans about 10
Geelong 14 out 15 finals campaign
We make 2 and no good enough so rebuild again.
The list we had took us to a preliminary and despite an horrendous run of injuries finals in 2024.
We had an AA half back nominated us.

The results this year shows they got it wrong
The player exodus shows they got it wrong
The coaching turnover they got it wrong
The football manager
No players putting there name to come to us.

They stuffed up big time

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 6:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10434
Location: Coburg
hang on Brisbane have made significant changes addressing list needs continually - to me this has been Carlton's issue (well one of them) they havet hought the side needs "tweaking" (or worse, we have the side now change the coach) not addressing significant issues - great clubs bite the bullet and address the issues - I finally feel like we may have done that!

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 6:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1666
Location: Deep Blue Sea
dannyboy wrote:
hang on Brisbane have made significant changes addressing list needs continually - to me this has been Carlton's issue (well one of them) they havet hought the side needs "tweaking" (or worse, we have the side now change the coach) not addressing significant issues - great clubs bite the bullet and address the issues - I finally feel like we may have done that!


Back in the day Danny, as you well know, we were very good at topping up or tweaking the list to continue the path to Glory. A few examples are Perovic, Wells, Rhys-Jones, Williams, Spalding .....

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 8:15 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3084
If we lose Charlie as well then physiologically it won't be good for players that are left. Not that I rate Charlie that highly anymore but I think it will effect team morale. We would need to win the first 5 games to get some belief back.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 8:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 19013
Location: threeohfivethree
I’m guessing you meant to write psychologically but if he’s been sooking it up in the change rooms then psychologically it’ll be a relief for a number of them.

The number one issue at the club since 1995 has been an entitlement mindset of the players.

I love David Parkin but he let that genie out of the bottle.

If Graeme Wright can end that we can’t pay him enough.

The club is bigger than you you overpaid little mother.flowers.

Suck it up.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2355 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112 ... 118  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arnhem blues, ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group