Blue Vain wrote:
Read the post. I didn't say he doesn't want to play ruck. I said "if he doesn't want to".
The coaches should give him the option and "if" he chooses not to accept it, move on from there.
So go bother someone else with your bullshit. Calling out Danny. He can't think for himself based off the facts. He must have been spooked by other posters because he has a different view.
It's the way you work. Patrolling the site attempting to devalue anyone who dares have an opinion different to yours. Baiting them into your childish games of endless @#$%&! arguments. Get over it. I'm not here to conform to what suits you.
Blue Vain
I explained myself, and I was just trying to help you understand why you are rubbing posters the wrong way with the way you pitch your so called "opinions".
As someone said, you don't like to be challenged, and can't handle it. I agree with that, but doesn't put me off reading your posts.
Its the way you pitch your "opinion" that's just not an opinion anymore. Its really obvious.
I did read your post.
You need to go and read your post, and the posts you have been pulled up on and ask yourself straight: Do my "opinions" sound like a matter of fact or an opinion?
You start the sentence with "if"...then go onto telling us
Quote:
Now if Harry could play the forward/ruck role, that would solve a heap of problems. [url]But at this stage, he doesn't appear to have the ability and/or inclination[/url].
Starts with "If " then followed by a description of Harry's inclination.
Quote:
So either Harry becomes a competitive second ruck like Joe Daniher (5 minutes per quarter) during the off season or if he doesn't want to, I'd look to trade him. We have to do whatever it takes to win as many games as possible as a team. Not cater to the needs of individual players.
You make it sound like Harry wants it his way and not following the coaches instructions or preferences., You are telling us Vossy shouldn't cater to individual needs. WTF is that? How is that an opinion? How is Harry manipulating anyone. Maybe Harry is just a shithouse ruckman and he's trying his best.
Its not Bullshit. The coaches have instructed Harry to play ruck. We all witnessed it. He looked out of place. The coaches said it was a trial. The coaches have said several times lately they prefer 2 KPs and 2 rucks. What makes you believe the coaches haven't asked him. They have but its you who wont move on (as you suggest).
As for dannyboy, did you notice in his post he is asking questions.
Quote:
going into this weekend's game I worry about that forward line of Harry/Curnow/TDK
or do we rest TDK on the bench when Pitto is rucking? Does that reduce our run?
Also - and I don't know the answer - Does playing Pitto/TDK,Charlie and Harry, does it hurt our turnover game?
With respect, I responded, assuming he wanted a response from members of the Public Forum. Get it? So I did respond to the questions.
Like him I don't the answer and suggested with the word "maybe" you've been spooked. Did you take that personal? Sounds like it.
You like to bring other posters into your fights?
Like Sydney said the other day, something about giving up on your hatred of Harry. There's a reason for that. And sinbagger wasn't looking for a fight, he just responded to your wording...I mean "opinions", and he countered that with an example you conveniently avoided.
Go and have a cold shower, have a good read of your posts, ask yourself the hard question, and show some respect to posters who respect you, coz the opposite isn't working. Its time for your reality check.
like Jake said, get a room if you've got a personal gripe, and lets stick to football and discuss footy issues in an open minded manner.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Where are those 4 fwits with the low IQ’s. I almost miss them. I know they aren’t actually Carlton supporters but……………….they were fun to dance with. 
