Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:36 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18736
Location: threeohfivethree
chief wrote:
Selwood aint their vice captain and part of the leadership group..


And Campo is only our vice captain and part of our leadership group because we're so void of leaders.

I don't blame him for being a wanker - he just is - but I also don't blame him for wanting to leave.

In fact...












































...it makes me rather happy... :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:37 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 437
Location: The Pratt Stand
Doesn't anyone see the irony of how everyone was screaming to get rid of campo and then suddenly when he decides to leave he is a traitor.

_________________
Number 17 - come on down!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:52 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21611
Location: North of the border
Teddy wrote:
Doesn't anyone see the irony of how everyone was screaming to get rid of campo and then suddenly when he decides to leave he is a traitor.


The club should have got something for him ,anything. A trade couldn't be done is because we were asking to much. Its stupid we dont want him - we dont want to pay him the salary but we weren't prepared to trade him so now we loose him altogether for nothing. Doesn't make sense . Unless they are still planing to make a deal with him to stay. Now wouldn't that be funny

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Sydney Blue wrote:
Unless they are still planing to make a deal with him to stay. Now wouldn't that be funny


No.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:00 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Sydney Blue wrote:
Teddy wrote:
Doesn't anyone see the irony of how everyone was screaming to get rid of campo and then suddenly when he decides to leave he is a traitor.


The club should have got something for him ,anything. A trade couldn't be done is because we were asking to much. Its stupid we dont want him - we dont want to pay him the salary but we weren't prepared to trade him so now we loose him altogether for nothing. Doesn't make sense . Unless they are still planing to make a deal with him to stay. Now wouldn't that be funny


Come on Sydney. The only offer was a negative offer - a crap player and a pick. That is the effect of a) Everyone recognising that Campo doesn't follow team plans, is petulant and an achilles heel and b) Sheedy knowing that everyone else knows that.

We'd have been mad to take the only offer. Dont believe the Essendon* hype that its all bolton's fault, I cannot belive (until Wolfe tells me so) that we would contemplate the trade).

We had no other option but to refuse that offer.

If Campo goes, its of his own choice. he has been overpaid for a long time, and is on record of stating how well off he is because of Carlton. Think about it - was in the top 20 paid plaers in the AFL in 2005 but wouldn't make the top 100 players. The guy needs to drop his expectations and respect the club.

But he wont, for he is a turkey.

Dont support players like this, Sydney. You cannot take his side in this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 26
BlueMark wrote:
As I have stated Campo paying across half back would be good for us and I would be quite happy for him to do so. To lose him may be just cutting our noses off just to spite our face and its not like we are oozing talent at the moment.


NO WAY. I'd rather he didnt take the place of a Simpson a Blackwell, or a Russell etc and flower off to Essendon*. I am sick of going to games and watching him point the finger, blame, whinge, complain and not do anything that a vice captain should. He's been on this here gravy train long enough and frankly our younger players will learn nothing from him.

The bad habits he'll pass down on and off the field arent worth it!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:08 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Let him pass on his habits to the Four HorseMen of Essendon* - Courtney Johns, Sam Hunt, Aaron Henneman and Jason Winderlich.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:21 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20265
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Yep, thanks for the memories Wayne Campbellreale

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18736
Location: threeohfivethree
Sydney Blue wrote:
Teddy wrote:
Doesn't anyone see the irony of how everyone was screaming to get rid of campo and then suddenly when he decides to leave he is a traitor.


The club should have got something for him ,anything. A trade couldn't be done is because we were asking to much. Its stupid we dont want him - we dont want to pay him the salary but we weren't prepared to trade him so now we loose him altogether for nothing. Doesn't make sense . Unless they are still planing to make a deal with him to stay. Now wouldn't that be funny


I don't have a problem with Campo leaving Sydney as I didn't want to keep him but you can't manufacture supply and demand. Unfortunately we were supplying one disgruntled whinging sooky la la and there just wasn't a huge market for that during trade week (except with Dean Laidley and he only likes the piss and poo boys).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
Okay simple facts on Campo

Last good memory i had of Campo was when he captained a game against with the absence of Braddles / SOS / Ratten and co then he didnt worry about Tags played a top game and showed good leadership cant rem if we won or not....... thats the last good memory since then

He Has shown selfish and negative attitude on the field with his poor attitude. He has been responsible for some of the younger guys to wonder why they put in when they have campo doing his own thing on 600K
His leadershipo amounts to getting the young kids to do his job showing not responibility.. He has a in the last 3 years shown dissention and refused to play the team game. He believes he is worth alot more than what he is worth and has been worth. He would be the main culprit in players like Lappin putting there hand out for longer and bigger pay packets on the basis well you have given it to Campo so i should as well.

When the club has wanted people to stand up put the club first show leadership and help the club get back on its feet he more interested to fill his pockets and do his own thing.

To add to all this 2005 - He has been offered a reasonable contract i believe was 250K per year for 2 years. He has knocked it back wanting 100K more and 3 years.

He wanted to go to the crows but put a 350K figure on that so crows said no so we couldnt trade there.
Of course he has stated he wants out and prob with Sheedy saying to him go PSD we will look after you didnt try an assist with a trade with the Bombers so we get nothing..

And what will happens in the end after all of this he will go to the bombers for 250K prob for 1-2 years hmmm looks same as the Blues original deal
Shows how much he things of the club Jumper and loyalty but then again havnt seen much of that over the last 3 years ... Got his big pay cheque and has pissed off.
So yer i dont have much of an opionion on him hope he stuffs up the culture in the Bombers the lil mercenary prick.
So i dont wish him well just good riddence


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:46 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21611
Location: North of the border
GWS wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Teddy wrote:
Doesn't anyone see the irony of how everyone was screaming to get rid of campo and then suddenly when he decides to leave he is a traitor.


The club should have got something for him ,anything. A trade couldn't be done is because we were asking to much. Its stupid we dont want him - we dont want to pay him the salary but we weren't prepared to trade him so now we loose him altogether for nothing. Doesn't make sense . Unless they are still planing to make a deal with him to stay. Now wouldn't that be funny


I don't have a problem with Campo leaving Sydney as I didn't want to keep him but you can't manufacture supply and demand. Unfortunately we were supplying one disgruntled whinging sooky la la and there just wasn't a huge market for that during trade week (except with Dean
Laidley and he only likes the piss and poo boys).


I dont give a rats about him either I just thought we could of got something for him- Pick 92 or What ever and taken a chance on a young bloke- Hell there might be another Eddie Bests out there that no wants .

Tell me if we delist him can he nominate for the National draft because Laidley still has one pick left.

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18736
Location: threeohfivethree
We can have pick 92 for free anyway - no need for a trade.

If we delist enough players we can have extra picks.

Can't we? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Wolfe wrote:
Okay simple facts on Campo

Last good memory i had of Campo was when he captained a game against with the absence of Braddles / SOS / Ratten and co then he didnt worry about Tags played a top game and showed good leadership cant rem if we won or not....... thats the last good memory since then

He Has shown selfish and negative attitude on the field with his poor attitude. He has been responsible for some of the younger guys to wonder why they put in when they have campo doing his own thing on 600K
His leadershipo amounts to getting the young kids to do his job showing not responibility.. He has a in the last 3 years shown dissention and refused to play the team game. He believes he is worth alot more than what he is worth and has been worth. He would be the main culprit in players like Lappin putting there hand out for longer and bigger pay packets on the basis well you have given it to Campo so i should as well.

When the club has wanted people to stand up put the club first show leadership and help the club get back on its feet he more interested to fill his pockets and do his own thing.

To add to all this 2005 - He has been offered a reasonable contract i believe was 250K per year for 2 years. He has knocked it back wanting 100K more and 3 years.

He wanted to go to the crows but put a 350K figure on that so crows said no so we couldnt trade there.
Of course he has stated he wants out and prob with Sheedy saying to him go PSD we will look after you didnt try an assist with a trade with the Bombers so we get nothing..

And what will happens in the end after all of this he will go to the bombers for 250K prob for 1-2 years hmmm looks same as the Blues original deal
Shows how much he things of the club Jumper and loyalty but then again havnt seen much of that over the last 3 years ... Got his big pay cheque and has pissed off.
So yer i dont have much of an opionion on him hope he stuffs up the culture in the Bombers the lil mercenary prick.
So i dont wish him well just good riddence


Hit.

Nail.

Head.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:51 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21611
Location: North of the border
GWS wrote:
We can have pick 92 for free anyway - no need for a trade.

If we delist enough players we can have extra picks.

Can't we? :?


you missed my point I dont want Sheedy getting anything for nothing even if it is a softcock like Campo

Serious question if we delist him and Lappin can they nominate for the National Draft or do they have to go through the PSD or can they do both

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:06 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3193
Location: Whistler
They can do both. But they can't name a price in the ND.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21611
Location: North of the border
Headplant wrote:
They can do both. But they can't name a price in the ND.


Thanks

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
If we were offered crap by Essendon* I'm glad we didn't take it. Sometimes it is worth making a stand and not letting ourselves get trampled over. With a guy like Camporeale we're going to win out anyway, we'll be one young draftee in front, we'll be a few hundred thousand bucks in front and we'll have one less ill-disciplined player on our list.

Who says we're getting nothing? ;)

What does Essendon* get? Another Carlton has been! Let them pave the road to Windy Hill with Sheedy's money for Campo. We will have the last laugh.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:24 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:19 pm
Posts: 1105
Get Prender the big fukca to run thru Campo when we play The Scum next year. Flatten the little turd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 11:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2158
Location: East Melbourne
I doubt if Prenda will still be with us next year.

Why would anyone want to give a free hand to Sheedy? I am sure the Carlton hierarchy will not want to give him anything. That is why they were not going to accept any crap from him in during this trade period.

Therefore, I believe that the club will do all that they can to talk Campo into staying on their terms. I think that Malouf and co have done a good job so far. They have Whitnall back in the fold and wanting to play for the jumper and they look to be very keen to come to terms with Lappin. Campo will be talked to as well I am sure and encouraged to come back. It has happened to other players before.

Giving Sheedy something free will be a last resort.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 11:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Honestly, I'd prefer Sheedy got him for free, read $250K(+?) per season and we paid him nothing.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluebo baggers, dadadadada, Google Adsense [Bot], keogh, mymanmurph and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group