Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 31, 2025 4:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 8:02 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6498
Best thing was the kids
Oliver snould hand back his paycheque


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 8:14 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:27 pm
Posts: 6388
Location: Conservative Brisbane :O(
As for durdin non htb, I can see why umpy didn't pay it. Didn't really have prior and Oliver had knocked it out like a cannon. Others will disagree

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 8:49 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 36049
Location: Half back flank
Negative: When the Dees lose, Essendon* gets a better draft pick

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 8:58 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:11 pm
Posts: 649
Traveller86 wrote:
Two wins in a row wearing our orange socks.

Wokeness wins.
Colouring my hair bright blue as we speak. :P

I never thought I'd say this, but I really wanna finish 9th this season. @#$%&! Hawthorn.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 9:33 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2781
CK95 wrote:
I wasn't that dirty on May but it'll be interesting to see what happens. I thought he chose not to deviate but he didn't choose to bump. The ball was right in front of him.

That said, it was good to see him go off with a sore head after the TDK mark :grin:


I agree with this. I’m not sure players should be rubbed out for that.

I thought Carroll and Cowan were excellent.
I like Williams going through the middle a lot.
And Moir showed something. I have hopes for him to play the role we wanted Martin to play.

I don’t think our list is as bad as some others think.
I do think our game plan needs some work, particularly the way we move the ball into the forward line.
And we could use a bit more speed in order to enable more space and better delivery.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 11:01 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25820
Location: Bondi Beach
17th Premiership wrote:
CK95 wrote:
I wasn't that dirty on May but it'll be interesting to see what happens. I thought he chose not to deviate but he didn't choose to bump. The ball was right in front of him.

That said, it was good to see him go off with a sore head after the TDK mark :grin:


I agree with this. I’m not sure players should be rubbed out for that.

I thought Carroll and Cowan were excellent.
I like Williams going through the middle a lot.
And Moir showed something. I have hopes for him to play the role we wanted Martin to play.

I don’t think our list is as bad as some others think.
I do think our game plan needs some work, particularly the way we move the ball into the forward line.
And we could use a bit more speed in order to enable more space and better delivery.


Nothing wrong with the list?
Is our window open or closed?

Our best 23 is great.

We have 9 small forwards.
We need a skinny 19yo to hold CHB


There’s glaring gaps.
Our list is as good as it can deliver
We are 12th on the ladder

The fact we had 17 players coming out of contract in 2025 and another 14 in 2026 tells me the obvious about our List as a whole. There was question re contracts on 30 of our players. I’d say there’s questions on 15 players of 44.

I agree it’s not as bad as some think and we can turn this around pretty quick.

Game plan vs Skills.
Did you see how many straight forward kicks went over players heads in the forwardline. I bet no one would be questioning th3 game plan if our players were consistent with the basics, kicking set shots at goal and executing easy passes to players on a lead…ignoring team mates in better position is a decision making issue.

Players need to be turned over. More than the 3 expected by the AFL. Our list issues run deeper than 3 players. At least 8, maybe 10 this year, and another 6-7 next year. That’s more likely than not, and that’s a lot of change to the list. Is that bad or good? Depends if we are rebuilding or playing for a Flag. Our rebuild started in 2015. Our List should be ripe for a tilt for a flag. Yeah? Nah ?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 11:05 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25820
Location: Bondi Beach
May knew what he was doing.

Dip the shoulder a tad and bang.

I don’t think May wanted to split Evans head open, but he knew if he chose to bump when he could have met him front on with a tackle.

May is stuck in the past. He willlearn from that, whilst doing time.

He’s a hot head.

Evans showed some great signs yesterday and kicked a beautiful set shot goal, something he’s been doing in the VFL, but not in the AFL.

Deserves a clap. Actions like Evans are team lifting. That hit turned our fortunes. Boys lifted watching a midgets courage.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 11:21 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4653
Location: lygon street
I'm finding going to gigs instead of the footy far less stressful and better for my mental health. Having said that it was nice to check the score and see we had a win. Got home and watched the replay. All very relaxing.

I said to a Melbourne supporting mate that Carlton chose to copy the Melbourne game style after 2021. We did it so well that we actually do their style better than they do. It's no surprise that both clubs are down the bottom end of the ladder with this outdated game plan.

As others have said, it was great to see some of the youngsters having really solid games. I'm not sold on Matt Carroll but he certainly played his best game so far and was amongst our best.

Moir likewise. His skill and talent are unquestionable. His application is. As good as he was taking his chances, he still faded in and out of the game. Hopefully the penny drops and he wants it as badly as we all want it for him.

Finally May... not sure he went out of his way to go through Evans, but he certainly didn't miss his chance. The feigned shock reaction from him says it all. I'm calling bullshit. At the end of the day, hopefully Frankie is all OK. I'm sure Chrisso will look after the rest :donk:

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 11:24 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10680
Take the win and enjoy it. Not going to critique. Good to see Cowan, Carroll and Moir doing well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 11:33 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:27 pm
Posts: 6388
Location: Conservative Brisbane :O(
Yeah Evans did not deviate until he got the ball (to evade, not shirk):and did not take his eyes off it. He must have known some serious heat was on the way. Ended up looking a bit like Leigh matthews at vfl Park but without the jelly legs. Bit of a farce that you've got blokes on the sideline looking at the vision. Id have thought blind freddy would immediately know an assessment needs to be made.

t

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 11:46 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4653
Location: lygon street
Oh and well done to Charlie Curnow. Kept at it and got some reward for effort last night. Loved his work up the ground and that kick to ice the game should be a lesson to him. Take your time. Take responsibility. Go back and kick it from outside 50 like you can. No more of this quickly play on and kick off 2 steps. You don't need to do it

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 12:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25820
Location: Bondi Beach
The_Cranium wrote:
Oh and well done to Charlie Curnow. Kept at it and got some reward for effort last night. Loved his work up the ground and that kick to ice the game should be a lesson to him. Take your time. Take responsibility. Go back and kick it from outside 50 like you can. No more of this quickly play on and kick off 2 steps. You don't need to do it


I hope the penny has dropped for him after that goal.

What a waste of opportunities he's had to hit the scoreboard this year. Opportunities created by hard work up field.

2025, Charlies wasted year.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 12:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25820
Location: Bondi Beach
Our first win with more than 8 out missing.
We had 14 missing for selection.

These players were missing in yesterday's win

Backline: Silvagni, Newman, Young

Midfield: Walsh Smith Cottrell Acres Cincotta

Forward line: McKay, Hollands, Kemp, McGovern, Fantasia

Depth: Ben Campoerale

The kids stood up: Carroll, Cowan, O'Farrell, Hollands, Lord

Kids nowhere near ready: White, Motlop, Young.

A really good win considering. Shows how bad Dees really are.

12th v 13th. Gotta be realistic.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 12:12 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7475
bondiblue wrote:
Game plan vs Skills.
Did you see how many straight forward kicks went over players heads in the forwardline. I bet no one would be questioning th3 game plan if our players were consistent with the basics, kicking set shots at goal and executing easy passes to players on a lead…ignoring team mates in better position is a decision making issue.

When bomb, bomb, bomb has been drilled into every player for the past 4 years, it will take a little time to change thing up, especially when under pressure.

List changes need to be made but I don't believe our players are as bad as they've shown this year.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 1:07 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1632
Location: Deep Blue Sea
Apart from the young kids having a good night how about the old man ...

Kudos to Doc for a great run down tackle followed up by a goal :clap:

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 1:56 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2781
bondiblue wrote:
17th Premiership wrote:
CK95 wrote:
I wasn't that dirty on May but it'll be interesting to see what happens. I thought he chose not to deviate but he didn't choose to bump. The ball was right in front of him.

That said, it was good to see him go off with a sore head after the TDK mark :grin:


I agree with this. I’m not sure players should be rubbed out for that.

I thought Carroll and Cowan were excellent.
I like Williams going through the middle a lot.
And Moir showed something. I have hopes for him to play the role we wanted Martin to play.

I don’t think our list is as bad as some others think.
I do think our game plan needs some work, particularly the way we move the ball into the forward line.
And we could use a bit more speed in order to enable more space and better delivery.


Nothing wrong with the list?
Is our window open or closed?

Our best 23 is great.

We have 9 small forwards.
We need a skinny 19yo to hold CHB


There’s glaring gaps.
Our list is as good as it can deliver
We are 12th on the ladder

The fact we had 17 players coming out of contract in 2025 and another 14 in 2026 tells me the obvious about our List as a whole. There was question re contracts on 30 of our players. I’d say there’s questions on 15 players of 44.

I agree it’s not as bad as some think and we can turn this around pretty quick.

Game plan vs Skills.
Did you see how many straight forward kicks went over players heads in the forwardline. I bet no one would be questioning th3 game plan if our players were consistent with the basics, kicking set shots at goal and executing easy passes to players on a lead…ignoring team mates in better position is a decision making issue.

Players need to be turned over. More than the 3 expected by the AFL. Our list issues run deeper than 3 players. At least 8, maybe 10 this year, and another 6-7 next year. That’s more likely than not, and that’s a lot of change to the list. Is that bad or good? Depends if we are rebuilding or playing for a Flag. Our rebuild started in 2015. Our List should be ripe for a tilt for a flag. Yeah? Nah ?


No I’m not saying there’s nothing wrong with the list.
Just that I don’t believe it is as bad as some others do.
I have seen those terrible skills, especially kicking and poor handballs.
However, I believe that a significant contributor to that is the poor game plan (or poor application of it) and perhaps a lack of preparation and planning, most likely from within the footy department.
There are several players show terrible skills who I know have demonstrated pretty good skills previously.
Many of these players only make it to the AFL if they have pretty good skills which is what separates them from everyone else who’d love to be playing at this level. And the high proportion of poor skills at Carlton compared with other clubs tells me this is more of a Carlton thing than a player thing.
Yes, there are some whose skills need to be better. But that can be mitigated through training and practise.
What I see are players who look confused about what to do, hesitating or in tow minds or there’s no-one leading or making space for others to lead and then we deliver under more pressure which results in poor execution.
Where other teams kick to space and let their teammates run onto the ball, too often we either try to pinpoint a teammate which is hard to do with little margin for error, or we bomb it on top of the heads of our teammates.
I don’t think this fixes everything but I do think a better game plan (including movement from players ahead of the ball) and greater clarity in the players’ minds, will result in better looking skills and execution.

I don’t think we are as far away as it looks right now. See Adelaide from last year, or Collingwood for that matter. Or Richmond 2016. Or Melbourne 2020. Or Collingwood 2021.

I do think we need a bit more pace through the middle and a bit more polish in front of goal. And we need a better executed game plan. And probably a change in some of the assistant coaches (if not the senior coach). And perhaps better training drills. And a more hungry and unquenchable drive to win amongst the playing group.
But I don’t think we need to start list again from scratch just yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 3:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25820
Location: Bondi Beach
17th Premiership wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
17th Premiership wrote:
CK95 wrote:
I wasn't that dirty on May but it'll be interesting to see what happens. I thought he chose not to deviate but he didn't choose to bump. The ball was right in front of him.

That said, it was good to see him go off with a sore head after the TDK mark :grin:


I agree with this. I’m not sure players should be rubbed out for that.

I thought Carroll and Cowan were excellent.
I like Williams going through the middle a lot.
And Moir showed something. I have hopes for him to play the role we wanted Martin to play.

I don’t think our list is as bad as some others think.
I do think our game plan needs some work, particularly the way we move the ball into the forward line.
And we could use a bit more speed in order to enable more space and better delivery.


Nothing wrong with the list?
Is our window open or closed?

Our best 23 is great.

We have 9 small forwards.
We need a skinny 19yo to hold CHB


There’s glaring gaps.
Our list is as good as it can deliver
We are 12th on the ladder

The fact we had 17 players coming out of contract in 2025 and another 14 in 2026 tells me the obvious about our List as a whole. There was question re contracts on 30 of our players. I’d say there’s questions on 15 players of 44.

I agree it’s not as bad as some think and we can turn this around pretty quick.

Game plan vs Skills.
Did you see how many straight forward kicks went over players heads in the forwardline. I bet no one would be questioning th3 game plan if our players were consistent with the basics, kicking set shots at goal and executing easy passes to players on a lead…ignoring team mates in better position is a decision making issue.

Players need to be turned over. More than the 3 expected by the AFL. Our list issues run deeper than 3 players. At least 8, maybe 10 this year, and another 6-7 next year. That’s more likely than not, and that’s a lot of change to the list. Is that bad or good? Depends if we are rebuilding or playing for a Flag. Our rebuild started in 2015. Our List should be ripe for a tilt for a flag. Yeah? Nah ?


No I’m not saying there’s nothing wrong with the list.
Just that I don’t believe it is as bad as some others do.
I have seen those terrible skills, especially kicking and poor handballs.
However, I believe that a significant contributor to that is the poor game plan (or poor application of it) and perhaps a lack of preparation and planning, most likely from within the footy department.
There are several players show terrible skills who I know have demonstrated pretty good skills previously.
Many of these players only make it to the AFL if they have pretty good skills which is what separates them from everyone else who’d love to be playing at this level. And the high proportion of poor skills at Carlton compared with other clubs tells me this is more of a Carlton thing than a player thing.
Yes, there are some whose skills need to be better. But that can be mitigated through training and practise.
What I see are players who look confused about what to do, hesitating or in tow minds or there’s no-one leading or making space for others to lead and then we deliver under more pressure which results in poor execution.
Where other teams kick to space and let their teammates run onto the ball, too often we either try to pinpoint a teammate which is hard to do with little margin for error, or we bomb it on top of the heads of our teammates.
I don’t think this fixes everything but I do think a better game plan (including movement from players ahead of the ball) and greater clarity in the players’ minds, will result in better looking skills and execution.

I don’t think we are as far away as it looks right now. See Adelaide from last year, or Collingwood for that matter. Or Richmond 2016. Or Melbourne 2020. Or Collingwood 2021.

I do think we need a bit more pace through the middle and a bit more polish in front of goal. And we need a better executed game plan. And probably a change in some of the assistant coaches (if not the senior coach). And perhaps better training drills. And a more hungry and unquenchable drive to win amongst the playing group.
But I don’t think we need to start list again from scratch just yet.


No one is saying the highlighted bit. That's an exaggeration in commentary.
We have a spine. WE have some good young players.
We have 2 KPFs who DO NOT have a set routine set shot at goal, and I can say the same about a few forwards.

Your comments reflect the easy way out by blaming the coach for everything. Players are untouchable, and as close to perfect as we need?

Which players who are not showing their proven skills? Curious. And we can start from there.
You are clearly blaming our poor skills (since round 1) on the Coach and MC.

I look forward to see your preferred minimal changes at the end of the year.
One Coach, 3 Assistant Coaches, and I will be surprised if its just the 3 changes to the list, which reflects your value of the players who fail to deliver.

The misses by foot last night highlighted to me the calibre of Dees and Carlton players reflect the 12th and 13th position on the ladder.

What we need to do NOW and before the List changes or New coach starts is which players can hit targets. Question whether player skills are where they should be.

I do not believe skills will be improved over one more summer or with a new coach. Like I said, I'd like to see which players you name whose skills can be blamed on the game plan.
New coaches usually make hard calls and weed out the unskilled and mentally weak, so I expect that in the 2nd year of a new coach. In the mean time its up to our Coach and List Mgr to weed out the weak.

I have no doubt the coach has nothing to do with all the easy set shots we have missed since round 1.
I cannot beileve these players who regularly miss targets can attribute their failure on the coach.
We don't need those types of conditional players on our list, or not all of them this year, and hopefully at the end of 2026 we will see the last of the passengers.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 3:50 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2781
I definitely don’t blame the coach for everything.
I’m not even convinced he should go at all. What he says makes a lot of sense to me. However, the players either aren’t able to execute to his plan (I think due to a combination of skills, decision making/footy IQ/ game plan/communication etc…) or his plan is not as good as he thinks. I do think we need different assistants - preferably including a very good match day tactician.
I think that Voss could do something similar to what Chris Scott did a few seasons ago ahead of their Premiership year when he tweaked their game plan in the off-season. In our case, transition into the forward line needs some work, IMO. Longmire also did something similar when he brought in Don Pyle. And both Nathan Buckley and Dimma altered their approaches after a club review when many thought they would be sacked.

I do think we have a spread of challenges across players, coaches, footy department, Board, culture etc…
And, as I’ve said previously, I don’t presume to have all the answers and am glad I don’t have the job of teasing out the exact recipe required to fix it - I really hope that Graeme Wright makes the right calls. Everyone will be in his ear with their own views and theories. Tough job. I’m just saying that I don’t think the list is as bad as some people make it out to be.
I do expect there will be some changes in the off-season but that will mainly be to fringe players and maybe one high profile player (apart from TdK). I’m pretty comfortable that the club knows more than I do about the players capabilities and I don’t think it will just be based on the skills displayed in this terrible year.
And, I will accept whatever the club (via GW) decides re Voss. If he stays, I’ll be right behind him. If he goes, I just hope they pick the right person to replace him (which I don’t think is easy to do…) but I’ll back that decision too. I have to assume that whatever the decision, it will be based on greater insight than I have from behind my keyboard.

In terms of players whose skills appear to have abandoned them: Charlie, Weitering, Cerra (who has previously been amongst the top rated deliverers/score involvements), Saad, McGovern*, Walsh.

* I think McGovern has great skills but is often lazy in application which results in poor execution.
I have not included the younger players although I assume most of them displayed good skills in order to get picked.

Overall, I don’t have an extreme view at all. I’m simply stating that I don’t think the list is as bad as some people think it is. I think there is more to work with than it seems right now and yes, a lot of accountability must sit with the players.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 7:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1296
Location: Melbourne
That was courage personified by Frank Evans. And tough as nails getting up and walking off the field.
That looked like major facial fractures to me. Not just a broken nose. Any word?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2025 7:18 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7866
Location: Bendigo
RickJ wrote:
That was courage personified by Frank Evans. And tough as nails getting up and walking off the field.
That looked like major facial fractures to me. Not just a broken nose. Any word?

Yeah, that’s 4-6 weeks if ever I’ve seen it.

Could be his last act for the club.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group