Michael Jezz wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
A win was fantastic but we played with 18 solid contributors yesterday.
Kerridge had 8 possessions including 4 clangers. Struggled in the wet conditions and IMO, was a surprise selection after burning the ball in the VFL the week before.
Palmer had 12 possessions with 6 clangers. Hard at it but didn't do enough.
Pickett had 11 possessions and 5 clangers. He's only a kid and deserves another opportunity but surprisingly for a skilled player, he struggles with the wet ball.
Daisy had 16 possessions, 5 clangers and was the only player not to win a contested possession. In fact he's averaging 2 contested possessions per game this season. Compare that to Murphy who has 37 contested possessions in 3 games, Ed Curnow who has 37, Cripps who has 34 or Gibbs who has 43. If we're going to carry players who cant win their own ball, we want kids who can at least use it when it's given to them.
I'd bring in Curnow, Graham and Polson. Polson was zippy and persistent and Graham deserves promotion after consistent form in the VFL. Pickett deserves another opportunity and retains his place.
Did you notice the rain yesterday?
Well picked up MJ! Your perception is improving. You're obviously smarter than most give you credit for.
I did notice the rain. But I also know footy is a winter sport. I also know only one venue in Australia has a roof on it so there's every opportunity we may see rain again.
Personally I believe we cant afford to carry players who can only make a meaningful contribution when the sun shines. They were poor in all 3 phases of the game. When we had the ball, they fumbled or gave it back to the opposition, when the ball was in dispute, they couldn't win the contest and when the opposition had the ball, they couldn't get it back off them.
So yes, Thomas, Kerridge and Palmer will be good depth players but when we have young blokes performing in the VFL, we should see if they can be better contributors. I dont think I'm asking for anything revolutionary.