Synbad wrote:
I'm struggling to come to terms with your point!
Obviously. It's pretty simple. Looking purely at the stoppages...Carrazzo goes down. Is there a player/players to fill the void. In the coaches eyes - Yes. In the players eyes - No. Why? I don't know. Why wouldn't you put your hand up and say 'Give me a go in the guts...I know I can perform'? Were the players too conditioned to the midfield game plan that
Judd..I mean the coaches put in place over summer which failed to address the hypothetical of roles changing if the contested ball-winners went down?
Synbad wrote:
players were not lazy six weeks ago.
No...they had their designated and practiced roles. Players got injured. The roles changed. The preparedness to adapt hasn't come.
Synbad wrote:
simply! we have lost the book to playing football and that's coaching strategy and preparedness for the current situation.
I'm not disagreeing with you here...both coaches and players to blame. Perhaps some more than most.
Synbad wrote:
spit it out!don't tiptoe through the tulips muddying the waters.
I think I was pretty clear. The numbers don't lie. If you think stats don't matter then you're wrong. They matter. Well...most do.
Synbad wrote:
are the players drilled and prepared for this but they are not buying into it for whatever reason?
Open training sessions are glorified kick-to-kick these days. But if you want my opinion, I don't think we have enough bodies on our list who want to go in and get the footy as if their life (or contracts) depended on it. I can think of three in Judd, Robinson and Simpson - but two in that list are better utilized elsewhere.