Sin City wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Sin City wrote:
[
That's hardly where most of the damage was done. Skill errors under perceived pressure from the midfield and defenders is where we fell down as well as getting hurt on the rebound. Hampson becomes a better player with each week that he misses.
We got smashed at the clearances and Warnock had no back-up.
You can never know for sure if we'd have won but it was clear that the MC wanted him to play and so they thought he was an improvement.
I was at the game and i certainly believe that Hammer could have had a big impact.
They had five more clearances than us in a game where Judd was monstered and couldn't get free.
Hampson more than anyone else on the list plays better the more match fitness and continuity in his play that he gets, bringing him in for his first game back while underdone would've been a mistake in a big final.
He wasn't underdone. Played two or three seconds games and was training the house down.
Judd's inability to get a free would not change if Hammer plays, but If we square the clearances or even get 5 up on them , you could reasonably expect to improve by three points.
However, even without Hampson we made some discipline errors which proved just as costly.