Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 8:30 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
shit i made the yankee cap more famous than a yankee can

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:16 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:38 pm
Posts: 69
+1

The new monogram is an inferior graphic symbol. The notches in the C's served a visual purpose, they helped define the shape of the letter, made the design feel balanced and strong, as well as giving it heritage character.

The rounded monogram is sterile, stripped of heritage character, as well as being visually weak.

When they changed the logo I was working in a design studio. All the graphic designers shook their heads in disbelief when they saw how our classic symbol had been butchered.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 2920
Location: at the Bay Oval....
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
Agree. Hawthorn and Richmond have also gone back to their traditional jumpers.


What makes a jumper traditional ?

The Hawthorn jumper has changed remarkedly from the first one they had in 1925. The current jumper is like the one they wore from 55 - 74. The glory days of the Hawks the jumper from 76 - 91 was different again.

Richmond also has had a few different designs. Only so many ways you can change a sash but they've changed what the sash looks like about 7 or 8 times.

_________________
Go to http://www.snoutslouts.org/ for a look at the mighty GFC...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm
Posts: 1857
Maybe it's just a Gen Y v Gen X, baby boomers thing but the new CFC is so much more better looking than the old it's not even a competition.

Keep it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:33 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
sjabc wrote:
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
Agree. Hawthorn and Richmond have also gone back to their traditional jumpers.


What makes a jumper traditional ?

The Hawthorn jumper has changed remarkedly from the first one they had in 1925. The current jumper is like the one they wore from 55 - 74. The glory days of the Hawks the jumper from 76 - 91 was different again.

Richmond also has had a few different designs. Only so many ways you can change a sash but they've changed what the sash looks like about 7 or 8 times.
That`s true, but the line trotted out to me is that we can`t go back and i`m pointing out that you can go back and have supporters like the decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:35 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:38 pm
Posts: 69
Nick wrote:
Maybe it's just a Gen Y v Gen X, baby boomers thing but the new CFC is so much more better looking than the old it's not even a competition.

Keep it.


There are 2 issues here... one is whether the new monogram is better without the notches in the C's. The other issue is whether the old CFC monogram that was hand sewn onto the jumpers looked better.

Clear as mud?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:35 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
sjabc wrote:
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
Agree. Hawthorn and Richmond have also gone back to their traditional jumpers.


What makes a jumper traditional ?

The Hawthorn jumper has changed remarkedly from the first one they had in 1925. The current jumper is like the one they wore from 55 - 74. The glory days of the Hawks the jumper from 76 - 91 was different again.

Richmond also has had a few different designs. Only so many ways you can change a sash but they've changed what the sash looks like about 7 or 8 times.
That`s true, but the line trotted out to me is that we can`t go back and i`m pointing out that you can go back and have supporters like the decision.

Can't please everyone.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24639
Location: Kaloyasena
JohnM wrote:
A recent trip to NYC (including a night at Yankee Stadium) got me thinking anew about something that's been bugging me for a while.

The New York Yankees are lucky enough to have one of the cleanest, simplest and most recognized logos in world sport. But of course, they know this and protect it and milk it for all its worth.

Consider this: when a Yankees fan sees a photo of their greatest ever player, Babe Ruth, they see him proudly wearing the NY logo:
Attachment:
babe-ruth-the-sultan-of-swat_3.jpg



Sixty years on, and their current favourite player is Derek Jeter. And when they see Derek go out to bat, they see him proudly wearing the same logo that Babe Ruth wore all those years ago:
Attachment:
Derek-Jeter.jpg



When you look at a photo or footage of arguably our greatest ever player, the great John Nicholls, you see him proudly wearing a logo that had all the power, symmetry and simplicity of the great Yankees logo:
Attachment:
majnicholls_narrowweb__300x426,0.jpg



Forty years on, when we see our current favourite player, he's wearing a logo that is quite different:
Attachment:
_JuddRd1109246a.jpg


The question is, why??

Why can one of the biggest, most professional (and profitable) sporting clubs in the world manage to keep their identity intact, and we can't?

Why did we feel the need to change our logo to allegedly 'modernise' it, when a team/brand as powerful and relevant and successful as the Yankees felt it appropriate to keep their identity the same as it ever was: the famous pinstripes, and the famous logo. Design like that never loses its appeal or its relevance.

The NY Yankees logo works on EVERYTHING, everywhere. They use it on merchandise, uniforms, the stadium, caps, memorabilia... everything. And it's a hell of a lot like the classic logo someone (more in this in a second) decided to phase out over a decade ago.

So... onto the WHO?

Who, exactly, decided to do this? Who thought it appropriate to throw out the key symbol that represented the MOST SUCCESSFUL PERIOD IN OUR CLUB'S HISTORY? Who, exactly, decided that the jumper Big Nick and Jezza and Kernahan and SOS and Bradley and all our other greats wore in those Grand Finals was no longer relevant?

I reckon it was the decision of a third-rate mind, and I also reckon changing the jumper to that degree should have been a very, very big deal. Not just something that was decided by some functionary at the club on a whim.

Pisses me off to think that we had a great symbol, and we threw it away for a far weaker version of the CFC, for no apparent reason or benefit.

I know there will be people who'll say "who cares... it's a carlton jumper and it's still the CFC..." and that's true. But it's only half the story. We had something great and we replaced it with something ordinary. We went from powerful and simple with a brutal elegance, to something weak, spindly and messy.

Yankees fans would burn the stadium down if the owner tried doing that (not that he'd be stupid enough), and rightly so. I tell you, if I was lucky enough to be born a Pratt, we'd be starting Season 2012 wearing the same logo that Carlton greats like Big Nick made famous.

But, of course, I'm just some guy ranting on a forum. So the whale-bones it is. Pity.



JohnM - this is a bit of hobby horse of mine - but the logo that John Nicholls wears on that jumper is that way because the technology in Australia at the time (im talking about the 1920s because that was when this jumper was introduced) could not replicate our proper logo (the one with notches) - if they could the jumper that Big Nick would be wearing in that photo would be the one with the notches the jumper that we finally started wearing in 1997.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:42 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:38 pm
Posts: 69
AGRO wrote:

JohnM - this is a bit of hobby horse of mine - but the logo that John Nicholls wears on that jumper is that way because the technology in Australia at the time (im talking about the 1920s because that was when this jumper was introduced) could not replicate our proper logo (the one with notches) - if they could the jumper that Big Nick would be wearing in that photo would be the one with the notches the jumper that we finally started wearing in 1997.



I had no problem with the jumper we wore from 1997 until 2004(?). I do have a problem with the sterilised version of the CFC monogram we're wearing today. The C's NEED the notches. This might sound silly, but it would be a much stronger symbol with them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24639
Location: Kaloyasena
4th Gen Blue Boy wrote:
AGRO wrote:

JohnM - this is a bit of hobby horse of mine - but the logo that John Nicholls wears on that jumper is that way because the technology in Australia at the time (im talking about the 1920s because that was when this jumper was introduced) could not replicate our proper logo (the one with notches) - if they could the jumper that Big Nick would be wearing in that photo would be the one with the notches the jumper that we finally started wearing in 1997.



I had no problem with the jumper we wore from 1997 until 2004(?). I do have a problem with the sterilised version of the CFC monogram we're wearing today. The C's NEED the notches. This might sound silly, but it would be a much stronger symbol with them.



I agree. I believe the jumper we started to wear in 1997 with the notches was the true representation of our jumper with our logo properly depicted, something that could not be done in the 1920s - but it took us 70 years to for the technology to catch up with the tradition.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
grrofunger wrote:
shit i made the yankee cap more famous than a yankee can


You should know I bleed Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Stamos wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
shit i made the yankee cap more famous than a yankee can


You should know I bleed Blue



Prove it, bleed for us, bleed now.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
So Agro and 4th Gen Blue Boy all the time we were wearing the old jumper ( 1927 to 97`) were you thinking, that`s a bad look, we should change it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 9:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24639
Location: Kaloyasena
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
So Agro and 4th Gen Blue Boy all the time we were wearing the old jumper ( 1927 to 97`) were you thinking, that`s a bad look, we should change it?


No - but the point is it wasnt our logo - it was a CFC "logo" that could be reproduced on our jumpers by the technology available at the time.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 10:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
hahah now we have a new york sightseeing google ad

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 10:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12544
Location: Brisbane
Best-looking logo:

Image

Best-looking jumper:

Image

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
Personally I prefer mine.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20234
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Revive this baby again...

http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=6580

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20234
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
And JohnM - Tap In 79 mentioned the NYY way back as well. Good example

tap in 79 wrote:
look at the new york yankees logo - the letters are all joined together.

NYC not N Y C with arty gaps... bring back the CFC.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2011 11:20 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
bluehammer wrote:
And JohnM - Tap In 79 mentioned the NYY way back as well. Good example

tap in 79 wrote:
look at the new york yankees logo - the letters are all joined together.

NYC not N Y C with arty gaps... bring back the CFC.


Ah yes...

Freaks me out that we had it so right, then someone decided to meddle.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: lawrence_angwin, Mickstar and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group