"No passengers"

Dirko · **Posted:** Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:21 pm

camelboy wrote:

North Adelaide already tried it back in 1989. It didn't go too well. :thumbsup:

Navy Blue Horse · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm **Posts:** 15848

Connex won't be happy

tommi · **Posted:** Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:58 pm

Why's that Horse...........?

kindest regards tommi

Navy Blue Horse · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm **Posts:** 15848

tommi wrote:

Why's that Horse...........?

kindest regards tommi

perfect slogan for a train company without a contract, T-Bag, dontcha think?

tommi · **Posted:** Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:09 pm

Gee Horse.........

wasn't planning on doing any thinking tonight really..........!

you've put me under a bit of pressure now............!

kindest regards tommi

Blueboy_Dan · **Joined:** Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am **Posts:** 5245

If that's the case, does this mean that we only have one player on our list for 2011?

camel · **Posted:** Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:38 am

sjabc wrote:

camelboy wrote:

North Adelaide already tried it back in 1989. It didn't go too well. :thumbsup:

Thankfully someone got it. :beer:

moshe25 · **Joined:** Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am **Posts:** 11671

Blueboy_Dan wrote:

If that's the case, does this mean that we only have one player on our list for 2011?

Well, it'd just be the same as the last 3 years then, wouldn't it?

Captain Dan · **Posted:** Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:44 am

moshe25 wrote:

Blueboy_Dan wrote:

If that's the case, does this mean that we only have one player on our list for 2011?

Well, it'd just be the same as the last 3 years then, wouldn't it?

Can see the press and opposition supporters having a field day with this one.

club29 · **Posted:** Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:35 am

ScottSaunders wrote:

"they know were coming" was superb. people still talk about it.

"they can smell what we are cooking" was crap

no passengers, is alright, but nothing special.

i think a great one, would be

ONE

nothing more, nothing less

ONE

one team, one club, one goal

I like the meaning behind this. We have to become a united machine. A family dare i say it. The team, the club as a whole and each and every supporter. Collingwood have cultivated this vibe and it is a little intimidating. Thats what we have to strive for.
I dont like the ONE angle as a slogan that much though. I dont really like No Passengers either as the slogan but think it could work combined with something else.

Blue Vain · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am **Posts:** 18030

I agree Club, I'd prefer to see a "take on one, take on all" approach rather than no passengers. "No passengers" seems to focus more on the negative IMO.
In saying that, nothing shits me more than hearing someone knock something without coming up with a solution or alternative.
Therefore, I'd like to see what some TC members can come up with. There'es plenty of creative minds getting around here.

Rexy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am **Posts:** 28227

Blue Vain wrote:

I agree Club, I'd prefer to see a "take on one, take on all" approach rather than no passengers. "No passengers" seems to focus more on the negative IMO.
In saying that, nothing shits me more than hearing someone knock something without coming up with a solution or alternative.
Therefore, I'd like to see what some TC members can come up with. There'es plenty of creative minds getting around here.

It seems to be a slogan which would avoid any potential backlash later on if onfield performances weren't to improve. It's a pretty 'safe' slogan I suppose, not a confident slogan at all. I can understand that approach even if it's a bit 'meh'.

jimmae · **Posted:** Sun Oct 31, 2010 5:25 pm

Rexy wrote:

Blue Vain wrote:

I agree Club, I'd prefer to see a "take on one, take on all" approach rather than no passengers. "No passengers" seems to focus more on the negative IMO.
In saying that, nothing shits me more than hearing someone knock something without coming up with a solution or alternative.
Therefore, I'd like to see what some TC members can come up with. There'es plenty of creative minds getting around here.

It seems to be a slogan which would avoid any potential backlash later on if onfield performances weren't to improve. It's a pretty 'safe' slogan I suppose, not a confident slogan at all. I can understand that approach even if it's a bit 'meh'.

I'm confused. Can you give me the scenario where that interpretation could be made? Seems more like a slogan preaching unity, hard work, and no excuses.

club29 · **Posted:** Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:24 pm

jimmae wrote:

Rexy wrote:

Blue Vain wrote:

I agree Club, I'd prefer to see a "take on one, take on all" approach rather than no passengers. "No passengers" seems to focus more on the negative IMO.
In saying that, nothing shits me more than hearing someone knock something without coming up with a solution or alternative.
Therefore, I'd like to see what some TC members can come up with. There'es plenty of creative minds getting around here.

It seems to be a slogan which would avoid any potential backlash later on if onfield performances weren't to improve. It's a pretty 'safe' slogan I suppose, not a confident slogan at all. I can understand that approach even if it's a bit 'meh'.

I'm confused. Can you give me the scenario where that interpretation could be made? Seems more like a slogan preaching unity, hard work, and no excuses.

If we start losing a few games and people start questioning Ratten then they will be seen as passengers and not really up for the team thing .....perhaps??

bluechucky · **Joined:** Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am **Posts:** 13689

"No passengers".... pfft,

"Take no prisoners" would be better.

jimmae · **Posted:** Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:36 pm

club29 wrote:

jimmae wrote:

I'm confused. Can you give me the scenario where that interpretation could be made? Seems more like a slogan preaching unity, hard work, and no excuses.

If we start losing a few games and people start questioning Ratten then they will be seen as passengers and not really up for the team thing .....perhaps??

That's not a safe position to take then, is it.

Blue Vain · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am **Posts:** 18030

jimmae wrote:

Rexy wrote:

Blue Vain wrote:

I agree Club, I'd prefer to see a "take on one, take on all" approach rather than no passengers. "No passengers" seems to focus more on the negative IMO.
In saying that, nothing shits me more than hearing someone knock something without coming up with a solution or alternative.
Therefore, I'd like to see what some TC members can come up with. There'es plenty of creative minds getting around here.

It seems to be a slogan which would avoid any potential backlash later on if onfield performances weren't to improve. It's a pretty 'safe' slogan I suppose, not a confident slogan at all. I can understand that approach even if it's a bit 'meh'.

I'm confused. Can you give me the scenario where that interpretation could be made? Seems more like a slogan preaching unity, hard work, and no excuses.

What's your interpretation of a passenger Jim?

Sydney Blue · **Posted:** Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:31 pm

I've got a terrific slogan

Go Blues :thumbsup:

Navy Blue Horse · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm **Posts:** 15848

Carlton 2011: THIS

bluegirl72 · **Joined:** Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm **Posts:** 23921

club29 wrote:

ScottSaunders wrote:

"they know were coming" was superb. people still talk about it.

"they can smell what we are cooking" was crap

no passengers, is alright, but nothing special.

i think a great one, would be

ONE

nothing more, nothing less

ONE

one team, one club, one goal

I like the meaning behind this. We have to become a united machine. A family dare i say it. The team, the club as a whole and each and every supporter. Collingwood have cultivated this vibe and it is a little intimidating. Thats what we have to strive for.
I dont like the ONE angle as a slogan that much though. I dont really like No Passengers either as the slogan but think it could work combined with something else.[/quote]

Combined with a membership or a myki card maybe?

(singing la la la la lala la la. according to Iggy Pop. :smile:

)

"No passengers"

Who is online