Michael Jezz wrote:
I agree with Sheehan. I think Trengove, Scully, Gysberts show more in their first season than Gibbs, Murphy, Kreuzer did in theirs. We can still improve our list in future drafts but my concern is our window is open for the next 4 years, while Judd is at his peak. Melbourne looks like they could contend within in 2 years and there Window is open for a decade. Anyway, this is all based on speculation and gut feeling but I think his article is more analytical than biased. I also remember Sheehan being pro Carlton in late 2007. I still think we are a key position player short at both ends and at least one A grade midfielder (to ease the pressure on Judd). Melbourne look only to be missing a key forward---if Watts develops, maybe 2 if he doesn't.
.. ..no way.. ..i reckon yer way off here.. ..Murph in his first year was quickly on his way to being one of our best mids until his injury.. ..admittedly Gibbs didn't set the world alight, but he was v.young when drafted.. ..as for Krooz, not sure what you would expect off a 1st year ruck but he exceeded all expectations.. ..also, the dee's are making their climb back up the ladder, while in murph and gibbs first years we as a team were still spoon contenders.. ..there's variables yer maybe not taking into account [like us losing stevo in 07]..
..Gys looks good for his first 2 games, though his disposal isn't as clean as it needs to be yet, ditto scully actually.. ..and how the hell do we still need another A grade mid to pair up with Judd, and the dee's aren't in need of any..?.. ..and aren't murphy and gibbs on their way to becoming A graders..?.. ..and as for KPP's if you listed theirs vs ours you'd find we've got more too..