Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Doc in what way to the filth look after their supporters?
I don't want to get too far off point here, but the Collingwood Social Club membership is far and away the best package vs that of another clubs' social club membership. That's the deal they did, they did it well, they communicate far more proficiently with their members than Carlton does and our membership 'value for money' and membership department is a fair way off the pace, I suspect, because to some extent their hands are tied with deals that occurred in the past.
As another aside - the points made by everyone in this thread are valid ones, so I'm not attacking anyone, but the number of voting members on this site is very low. Extremely low. In fact Carlton has less than 9,000 voting members. Forget about the recent non-democratic board placement for a second and think about what your membership gives you. For the majority on here it actually only gives you access to the footy. And for most of you, that's all you want. But when you voice strong opinion on how things are run, and how you want change to occur and the timeline it should be done in - your voice is a silent one. Is the footy club interested in your opinion as a non-voting member? Probably not. They want your cash - sure, and they want more members because that's another figure to show the sponsors that their brand is reaching a maximum audience. But the real number the sponsorship executives want to see is the TV numbers.
So why the need for members? Money? Yep - there's no doubting it plays a big part. Bragging rights? Yep...though not important in the big picture. In modern professional sport in Australia, there's an unhealthy reliance placed on club membership. If a club such as Carlton knows the name, telephone number, e-mail and address of approximately 10,000 people who hadn't renewed from season 2009 - wouldn't they flood that person with mail? Set aside a night for the boys to jump on the phone and call? Send e-mails advertising special deals? Use Social Media as a membership tool?
In fact if club membership were the be all and end all for me as a CEO of a footy club, wouldn't I take a trip to India - talk to Sachin Tendulkar's management and donate 200k to his charity (
https://www.indiacancer.org) - get him to pose in a Carlton Football jumper, TwitPic it on Sachin's Twitter page, the Carlton, AFL, Facebook, Twitter & Cricket Australia website and invite he, his wife and his kids to Carlton when next in Australia? Set up a website connecting Carlton, PeterMac, IndiaCancer, Visy etc, brand your logo in Australia indian-laden Universities and showcase the clubs Corporate Social Responsibility which would translate into thousands of members and good press.
Just a thought.
Hey Doc, fantastic post game report on Monday, and now this one.
On your first point re Collingwood's great deal (I assume you're referring) with the MCG, that is a great advantage for Collingwood, but I believe that over time (after contractual obligations are fulfilled) we will catch up.
Interesting that we only have 9000 voting members. We always need reminding of that point. We've always had low voting numbers. I really don't believe though that our vote at elections is going to make a difference to our voice being heard, acknowledged and actioned when it comes to improvements in Marketing and Communication or even Supporter events such as the pie night. A couple of reasons for that: 1, because when no one contests for positions on the CFC board, issues such as improvements in Marketing & Communication (or other incumbent weaknesses) are not going to be discussed because they are negatives when the promotion of the great job the Marketing Dept does given the great Membership numbers is (self serving) preferred for obvious reasons (to push their own barrow); 2, the Marketing & Communication Improvements (and others) are not discussed or promoted by any incumbents or candidates contesting for a seat (see point 1) when the Debt, the promotion for increased spending on the Footy Department (always a winner), Pokies (revenue stream...another winner) are given 100% of the energy from incumbents.
If all the 40,000 members had votes, we may be promoting a more democratic and thorough discussion process, or on the other hand, we could end up in an anarchical state (with too many splinter groups developing).
Now the last point you make re Tendulkar,

tells me you're in the wrong job, cruising between Hawthorn and Princes Park to watch our puppies train over a latte ot two. Great idea. I'm sure you have heaps of them, as others have proven to have too. How the hell can we get something like great idea up and running without the Marketing Dept feeling threatened by lateral thinkers?
Seriously, the boys club at Carlton is a bit of a joke, and it all starts at board level imo. I just hope that we continue with Pratt's legacy to introduce great initiatives and do everything we do with Best Practise Priciples as the Benchmark.