Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 7:37 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:29 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10378
Location: Coburg
ah that's why Roos coaching the way he does, he doesn't want the players to think in case they misunderstand what he is on about

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:41 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
dannyboy wrote:
ah that's why Roos coaching the way he does, he doesn't want the players to think in case they misunderstand what he is on about



too deep for me :confused:

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
dannyboy wrote:

so winning clearances, tackling, winning contested ball - that's a player's skill, but kicking out of bounds nine times, missing easy set shots on goal, missing leading targets, etc - that's the coaches fault.


I think indecision and confusion are contributing factors to poor efficiency. Lack of care and technique are also factors.

Gaining possession and efficient/constructive disposal are 2 different beasts. We obviously haven't tamed the 2nd beast.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16820
Location: Melbourne
Slyuss wrote:
We really really need to sack the skills coach. Can anybody confirm this is Craig Bradley?

Clearly our skills aren't up to scratch... somebody needs to be held accountable. The proof is in the pudding right here!!

Somebody needs to be sacked over this disgraceful effort. Drop a few players and if Ratten is not sacked... get rid of Craig.


Always a little ray of

Image

when you visit TC

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:47 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I dont know my role so Im just going to kick the ball OOF

:lol:

Thats gold!!


So you've never made a silly mistake when mentally pressured/confused or caught in two minds?

I recall it was you a couple of days ago, who, when asked about Ratts on this forum, said something to the effect of, "I can see Brett Ratten standing on the dais with our 17th cup" Now, if you go back and read some of your own posts of the last 24 hours or so, you have changed that tune to something like, "All this hysteria about sacking Ratten. Let's wait till the end of the year and see how it all unfolds bla bla bla"

Did the pressure of seeing your mate screw up again on Saturday night cause you to make that outlandish comment?
Or are you just tinkering with your opinion/position on this topic.

BTW. lets clear something up. Look through all of my posts and you will see that I have never said I want Ratten sacked now. I'm pissed off with Sat night like most of us, I don't believe he will take us forward but I have always said that he must be given 2010 to prove himself. We are all so desperate for premiership 17, that I would love to be proven wrong. I just don't think I will be

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:50 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
As frustrating as it is, IS it caused by poor skills or lack of confidence?

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10378
Location: Coburg
a combination with

experience, strength, fitness, niggles, what happened at home that week, digestion, the light, which way the wind is blowing, flu, new boots, the surface, etc etc etc.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
dannyboy wrote:
a combination with

experience, strength, fitness, niggles, what happened at home that week, digestion, the light, which way the wind is blowing, flu, new boots, the surface, etc etc etc.


Yes, those things that all those 15 other clubs above us on the efficiency ladder have to deal with as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:48 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
Cazzesman wrote:
Slyuss wrote:
We really really need to sack the skills coach. Can anybody confirm this is Craig Bradley?

Clearly our skills aren't up to scratch... somebody needs to be held accountable. The proof is in the pudding right here!!

Somebody needs to be sacked over this disgraceful effort. Drop a few players and if Ratten is not sacked... get rid of Craig.


Always a little ray of


when you visit TC

Regards Cazzesman


I want to know what the sackers plan to do after our next bad game?? Sack the new blokes, and then dip into this bottomless pool of expert coaches?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:40 am
Posts: 5
Hello all. This my first post and I decided to about a thing that annoys me. This article is written as Stats Confidential, and while I accept we have terrible kicking efficiency this article does bend the stats to prove a point. The line if you take out the Richmond game we are 15 in kicking efficiency, when he takes out our Richmond game is he taking all other teams round 1 game? Is he taking out all other teams games against Richmond? I think if you are going to write a stats based article it should be the stats, not the stats bent to make the writers point seem more justified.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:06 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
99prelim wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I dont know my role so Im just going to kick the ball OOF

:lol:

Thats gold!!


So you've never made a silly mistake when mentally pressured/confused or caught in two minds?

I recall it was you a couple of days ago, who, when asked about Ratts on this forum, said something to the effect of, "I can see Brett Ratten standing on the dais with our 17th cup" Now, if you go back and read some of your own posts of the last 24 hours or so, you have changed that tune to something like, "All this hysteria about sacking Ratten. Let's wait till the end of the year and see how it all unfolds bla bla bla"

Did the pressure of seeing your mate screw up again on Saturday night cause you to make that outlandish comment?
Or are you just tinkering with your opinion/position on this topic.

BTW. lets clear something up. Look through all of my posts and you will see that I have never said I want Ratten sacked now. I'm pissed off with Sat night like most of us, I don't believe he will take us forward but I have always said that he must be given 2010 to prove himself. We are all so desperate for premiership 17, that I would love to be proven wrong. I just don't think I will be


You cant link simple errors like kicking OFF to being confused about your role and pin that back on the coach.

Please provide a link to any post I've made saying wait til the end of the year. I'd be amazed if you can. Might have been KK who said that :wink:

Trying to turn the attention on me after I caught you out saying something dumb?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10378
Location: Coburg
Rexy wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
a combination with

experience, strength, fitness, niggles, what happened at home that week, digestion, the light, which way the wind is blowing, flu, new boots, the surface, etc etc etc.


Yes, those things that all those 15 other clubs above us on the efficiency ladder have to deal with as well.


but only Carlton deal with lack of confidence brought about by a confusing coach. :garthp:

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:17 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8185
Our different forward structure now requires a few more possessions going forward to set up an opportunity, not good with our disposal, rather than let go with a pass outside 50 to a brilliant leading target as it did previously. That gave us structure and predictability for our players. Not only that, that target had the tremendous ability to turn crap into gold. That contributes alot to our goals inside forward 50 from one year to the next. We were right up there in "points for" last year.

That only tells part of the story though. Our ability to give up goals directly from turnovers in defence hurts. Turn overs too are a fact of life with the pressure, look at the St. K v Coll game, and like other sides we must learn too to make sides sides suffer for their mistakes like we do. Brisbane had as many turnovers as we did but didn't pay like we did. Big part of that was their much better forward structure but other sides do it to us too. Less turnovers would help alot as we have too many but where we turn it over and how we take advantage of opposition turnovers must be looked at too.

Thing is too when we do take a risk and run forward historically our skills are alot better. People run to space creating options. Once you get the ball in quickly into space skills are easier to execute as players have room to run on to the ball. That was a strength last year. I know we have to learn the defensively aspects too, which failed us at times last year, but at present the skill to move the ball around in more crowded spaces going forward finds our skills out. We simply have to make ourselves work harder the other way. Just means running harder both ways. We did it at times successfully last year remembering the St.Kilda and Swans games in particular. Need it to be a habit. The really good sides do it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
dannyboy wrote:
Rexy wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
a combination with

experience, strength, fitness, niggles, what happened at home that week, digestion, the light, which way the wind is blowing, flu, new boots, the surface, etc etc etc.


Yes, those things that all those 15 other clubs above us on the efficiency ladder have to deal with as well.


but only Carlton deal with lack of confidence brought about by a confusing coach. :garthp:


It's possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16820
Location: Melbourne
latrobeblue wrote:
Hello all. This my first post and I decided to about a thing that annoys me. This article is written as Stats Confidential, and while I accept we have terrible kicking efficiency this article does bend the stats to prove a point. The line if you take out the Richmond game we are 15 in kicking efficiency, when he takes out our Richmond game is he taking all other teams round 1 game? Is he taking out all other teams games against Richmond? I think if you are going to write a stats based article it should be the stats, not the stats bent to make the writers point seem more justified.


Welcome Latrobeblue. :thumbsup:

The Stats Confidential is just like the TC you know and love. Neither lets the stats/facts get in the way of a good story. Just design every 'opinion' you have is if it were an umitigated fact and you'll fit right in. :razz: :razz:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Cazzesman wrote:
latrobeblue wrote:
Hello all. This my first post and I decided to about a thing that annoys me. This article is written as Stats Confidential, and while I accept we have terrible kicking efficiency this article does bend the stats to prove a point. The line if you take out the Richmond game we are 15 in kicking efficiency, when he takes out our Richmond game is he taking all other teams round 1 game? Is he taking out all other teams games against Richmond? I think if you are going to write a stats based article it should be the stats, not the stats bent to make the writers point seem more justified.


Welcome Latrobeblue. :thumbsup:

The Stats Confidential is just like the TC you know and love. Neither lets the stats/facts get in the way of a good story. Just design every 'opinion' you have is if it were an umitigated fact and you'll fit right in. :razz: :razz:

Regards Cazzesman


Fact is our efficiency sucks!! ...for a range of different reasons :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 6:13 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
99prelim wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so he's got us winning clearances, tackling and contested ball not bad for a bloke who can't coach. mind you, he should be out there kicking the !@#$%& thing for 'em.


What the stats say is he has the cattle on the field. Turnovers and errors are just a part of the human trait of making a mistake. We all make them. My point is that
1) Hellas Blue is right on the mark. You will make more mistakes from stagnant play rather than a more urgent play. There are lots of reasons, too much time to think, losing instictiveness, your momentum and that of the person you are passing to, having your opponent halfway up your backside because you've given him the time to man up, and the perceived pressure that comes with that. Running into space camouflages turnovers cause if the target isn't perfect, you may have 1-3 seconds to collect the ball. Think about it. If Thornton passes to Simpson on a wing and misses him by 5-10 metres, and there's no one within cooey of him, Simpson, by the very fact that he is in motion will probably pick up the ball in a couple of seconds and the crowd won't care as much that Thornton missed the target in the first place.
2) Turnovers and errors can also be influenced by the mental state of the player. If there is any confusion about the message coming from above or the script that needs to be followed, players are much less forthright and much more anxious with their decision making

I don't know if the players are confused or not, or if that dreaded 'gameplan' comes into question. I'm happy to admit, I don't know. What I do know is that we have been beaten consistently by at least 4 four teams in Ratten's tenure. That is a worry. Another worry is that I have now heard from two different sources in the newspaper over the last 12 months that there is a perception that Ratten's structures are disorganised, and that two senior players last year were cautioned/punished for mouthing off to other players that Ratten's message was confusing and constantly changing. Yes it's just the media, but sometimes you have sit up and listen


Good post...surely there is not a great difference in skill level between our list and other mid table teams...the turnovers come from negative reactive plays....why is it when we play direct reckless abandon footy that our skills suddenly improve??? It is all about confidence and this confidence is instilled via confidence in the coach and in the methods and plays being used...

We are greatly lacking direction at the moment and this stifles player confidence and errors occur because of it. The players mindsets are not right...they need to be encouraged to back themselves at all costs and play instinct footy....this is a good place to start and once team confidence rises then you can tweak all you want....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 6:53 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
We turn the ball over because we're not a skilled side. Players picking the wrong option can be attributed to poor coaching (although experience is also a factor) but you don't miss an open team mate 30 metres away because you're confused or because your instincts have been stifled. You miss because your skills need improvement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:01 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10378
Location: Coburg
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
99prelim wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
so he's got us winning clearances, tackling and contested ball not bad for a bloke who can't coach. mind you, he should be out there kicking the !@#$%& thing for 'em.


What the stats say is he has the cattle on the field. Turnovers and errors are just a part of the human trait of making a mistake. We all make them. My point is that
1) Hellas Blue is right on the mark. You will make more mistakes from stagnant play rather than a more urgent play. There are lots of reasons, too much time to think, losing instictiveness, your momentum and that of the person you are passing to, having your opponent halfway up your backside because you've given him the time to man up, and the perceived pressure that comes with that. Running into space camouflages turnovers cause if the target isn't perfect, you may have 1-3 seconds to collect the ball. Think about it. If Thornton passes to Simpson on a wing and misses him by 5-10 metres, and there's no one within cooey of him, Simpson, by the very fact that he is in motion will probably pick up the ball in a couple of seconds and the crowd won't care as much that Thornton missed the target in the first place.
2) Turnovers and errors can also be influenced by the mental state of the player. If there is any confusion about the message coming from above or the script that needs to be followed, players are much less forthright and much more anxious with their decision making

I don't know if the players are confused or not, or if that dreaded 'gameplan' comes into question. I'm happy to admit, I don't know. What I do know is that we have been beaten consistently by at least 4 four teams in Ratten's tenure. That is a worry. Another worry is that I have now heard from two different sources in the newspaper over the last 12 months that there is a perception that Ratten's structures are disorganised, and that two senior players last year were cautioned/punished for mouthing off to other players that Ratten's message was confusing and constantly changing. Yes it's just the media, but sometimes you have sit up and listen


Good post...surely there is not a great difference in skill level between our list and other mid table teams...the turnovers come from negative reactive plays....why is it when we play direct reckless abandon footy that our skills suddenly improve??? It is all about confidence and this confidence is instilled via confidence in the coach and in the methods and plays being used...

We are greatly lacking direction at the moment and this stifles player confidence and errors occur because of it. The players mindsets are not right...they need to be encouraged to back themselves at all costs and play instinct footy....this is a good place to start and once team confidence rises then you can tweak all you want....


piffle

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:55 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
TruBlueBrad wrote:
99prelim wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I dont know my role so Im just going to kick the ball OOF

:lol:

Thats gold!!


So you've never made a silly mistake when mentally pressured/confused or caught in two minds?

I recall it was you a couple of days ago, who, when asked about Ratts on this forum, said something to the effect of, "I can see Brett Ratten standing on the dais with our 17th cup" Now, if you go back and read some of your own posts of the last 24 hours or so, you have changed that tune to something like, "All this hysteria about sacking Ratten. Let's wait till the end of the year and see how it all unfolds bla bla bla"

Did the pressure of seeing your mate screw up again on Saturday night cause you to make that outlandish comment?
Or are you just tinkering with your opinion/position on this topic.

BTW. lets clear something up. Look through all of my posts and you will see that I have never said I want Ratten sacked now. I'm pissed off with Sat night like most of us, I don't believe he will take us forward but I have always said that he must be given 2010 to prove himself. We are all so desperate for premiership 17, that I would love to be proven wrong. I just don't think I will be


You cant link simple errors like kicking OFF to being confused about your role and pin that back on the coach.

Please provide a link to any post I've made saying wait til the end of the year. I'd be amazed if you can. Might have been KK who said that :wink:

Trying to turn the attention on me after I caught you out saying something dumb?


In8 wrote: I have concerns about Ratts too but sacking him immediately isn't going to magically fix the deficiencies in our playing list and improve the existing players skills, mental application and effort

TBB responded: I was going to reply to this myself, but I can't say it much better than that other than to say I'm not here repeating the same thing and to suggest its blind allegiance is laughable. I guess hysterically calling for him to be sacked :confused: is informed and and reasoned

Source: Sakc Ratten thread, page 13

Given that "you could not have said it better yourself", are you also suggesting that you also have concerns about Ratts and that sacking him immediately isn't the answer. Not convincing for someone who believes he will be holding our next premiersship on the dais now is it?

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender, Bing [Bot], daggs001, TBWKTM and 114 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group