Blue Beatle wrote:
Hornet wrote:
A player with limited ability but even so I would have thought Brad Fisher would go before him.
couldn't agree more - but why would you delist cloke and keep fisher
i would have thought that cloke leads well and kicks miles better than fisher, is a presence and is strong - can't fathom some decisions.
maybe those who see carlton live eaxh week can enlighten me as we only see games on telly
Fisher's father isn't a Damir.
Fisher isn't a bad egg.
If we take Fisher, Cloke, Wiggins and Johnson off the list, we would have to replace them using picks 75, 91 and 107.
I'd rather have Wiggins, Fisher and Johnson in our bottom six than the underdeveloped dregs you will draft that late.
Apparently we'll be scraping the bottom of the barrel with picks 43 and 59, yet alone with even later picks.
If Wiggins, Fisher and Johnson are rated higher than the available players and able to fill a need, it makes sense that they stay.
Like it or not, Fisher will get a game next year.
Even Geelong and St Kilda had hacks getting a game this year.
So why wouldn't Fisher stay as a fall back solution
Or should we play Tiller before he's ready
Don't forget, Carlton will need three players to delist next year as we start picking at selection 18 to 20.
Jeez, I almost had a heart attack when I read 'full back' instead of 'fall back'. Either way, he'll be lucky to get a regular game IMO.
Login
Register
FAQ
