I think in the era of Hudson/Wade/Mckenna/Jezza it might have happened.
Not in recent times. About two years ago, thepundits were saying the era of 100 goal FF was over due to the flood etc.
Funny thing, that. At one stage they were saying Fev, Buddy and Bradshaw were all a show this year. If Buddy decides to kick straight one of these weeks he's going to get an even dozen and Fev had a haul of 6-5 recently so he could easliy get 10 on a good day. Trouble is the opposition. We will be hard pressed to win against Hawthorn and Brisbane. Port maybe and we haven't beaten North for an eon so I think Fev will be up against it.
There is always the possibility that if the Rd22 game against Hawthorn isn't critical to their final 4 position, win or lose, that they will rest some players or protect them against injury for the finals. In that case we might get an unlikely win and Fev might kick a bag. On the other hand, if they need to win by 100 points to pip the Dogs for second place, we might be in for a tough night. In that case Fev mighn't get too many shots.
I'm sure Fev won't want to be going into Rd 22 needing about 6 for the ton... It might upset the team goals if the players want to get him to 100. The answer is to get there by Rd 21

I think in the era of Hudson/Wade/Mckenna/Jezza it might have happened.
Not in recent times. About two years ago, thepundits were saying the era of 100 goal FF was over due to the flood etc.
Funny thing, that. At one stage they were saying Fev, Buddy and Bradshaw were all a show this year. If Buddy decides to kick straight one of these weeks he's going to get an even dozen and Fev had a haul of 6-5 recently so he could easliy get 10 on a good day. Trouble is the opposition. We will be hard pressed to win against Hawthorn and Brisbane. Port maybe and we haven't beaten North for an eon so I think Fev will be up against it.
There is always the possibility that if the Rd22 game against Hawthorn isn't critical to their final 4 position, win or lose, that they will rest some players or protect them against injury for the finals. In that case we might get an unlikely win and Fev might kick a bag. On the other hand, if they need to win by 100 points to pip the Dogs for second place, we might be in for a tough night. In that case Fev mighn't get too many shots.
I'm sure Fev won't want to be going into Rd 22 needing about 6 for the ton... It might upset the team goals if the players want to get him to 100. The answer is to get there by Rd 21

Who has the best six year average for a Carlton player? Fevola is nudging 70 (Avg of 66.83 to date over the past six years).

Whilst there is a limit to how many pages we can have verbs, (and you're always welcome back to help out - we're looking forward to your revamped the sacking of Robert Walls page), we'd suggest Vallence 1931-1936 at an average of about 75 per year is the record holder.

http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... H+Vallence

From the Blueseum

I only rescently got my login working again.

That's an interesting rough stat you've come up with there. Fevola will be just short of 70 by season's end, and that's not very far behind Vallence at all. I've been checking out Kernahan, and he was more a CHF than a FF but Fev seems to be just pipping him at the moment.

I'd prefer he has one huge game in the next four weeks and rounds off the year with 100 goals.

Fev's AVG's against the next 4 opponents.


PORT - 2.66 goals.

NORTH - 4 goals

LIONS - 2.54 goals

HAWKS - 4 goals.



Fev's AVG's at the grounds.


GABBA - 0.57 goals
DOME - 3.38 goals.
Gonna be tough, but i reckon he can do it provided we deliver it to him correctly.

I hope the Blueseum recognises somewhere Fevola's effort of passing off the ball to Stevens when he had just taken a mark 45M out in front.

Would be staring 150 in the face next week if it wasn't for the Fevola persecution society, AKA the AFL umpires.