Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 25, 2025 7:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 89 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:07 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:56 pm
Posts: 120
His heart been broken Day IN Day out so hes frustrated - Alot feel like that.

But the simple reality of is that it gonna take time - Patience is sometimes a very hard work to relate to in this current world but we have to have it along with clear & precise plans for thr club to get to where it needs to be - Top 4 everyyear, starting from next year. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:46 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
The Guidelines wrote:
Do not attack other people, attack their argument - and this does not mean changing "you are an idiot" into "your comments are idiotic"


Posts have been removed from this thread. Suspensions will be given next time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:12 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Michael Jezz wrote:
4. Not appreciating that the game is not an in an under hard ball get contest. Coaching has to revolve around accurate disposal and athletic running. Ratten appears to continue Pagan's old school philosophies. He is
being protected by the fact that he has a better playing list


Now that there is just plain WRONG!!!!

The game now is exactly about getting in and under, because the rules protect the player so much that if you go in hard for the ball, more than likely you will win the ball or a free.
Yes you need you outside players just as much to creat the run, but lets not forget that possession is 9 tenths of the game.

I suggest you take a chill pill and break up the game into segments. Then look at the segments we play well and the one when we don't. You will see that when we play well, we move the ball quickly and accurately and look as good as any team in the comp. The problem is that when you look at the segments where we play bad, it's poor disposal and lack of intesity from certain players that kill any momentum we have. This is where you can critisize the coach, however I don't see the bad sections as bad coaching, but bad execution of skills and laziness. Now some of this can be blamed on the coach, but for the most part it's more to do with a losing culture and lack of development over the years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:39 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Steve_C7 wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
4. Not appreciating that the game is not an in an under hard ball get contest. Coaching has to revolve around accurate disposal and athletic running. Ratten appears to continue Pagan's old school philosophies. He is
being protected by the fact that he has a better playing list


Now that there is just plain WRONG!!!!

The game now is exactly about getting in and under, because the rules protect the player so much that if you go in hard for the ball, more than likely you will win the ball or a free.
Yes you need you outside players just as much to creat the run, but lets not forget that possession is 9 tenths of the game.

I suggest you take a chill pill and break up the game into segments. Then look at the segments we play well and the one when we don't. You will see that when we play well, we move the ball quickly and accurately and look as good as any team in the comp. The problem is that when you look at the segments where we play bad, it's poor disposal and lack of intesity from certain players that kill any momentum we have. This is where you can critisize the coach, however I don't see the bad sections as bad coaching, but bad execution of skills and laziness. Now some of this can be blamed on the coach, but for the most part it's more to do with a losing culture and lack of development over the years.


You did not understand my point which is that you will not win games in modern football any more just because you win the contested football. Of course that is important. Our problem is that our outside work and delivery by foot has not improved under Ratten. There are 4 or 5 key points that the coach can have some real imput: fitness, strength, player selection, skill development and game plan. Sorry, up to now, I have not seen improvement in any of those areas. Saturday proved that our recruiting has improved & only recruiting of ready made players as opposed to player development. Judd, Hadley, Kruezer, Pfeiffer are all ready made players.... Long way to go and I support Ratten but there are
worrying signs and he needs to start hitting his straps sooner rather than later.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:28 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Michael Jezz wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
4. Not appreciating that the game is not an in an under hard ball get contest. Coaching has to revolve around accurate disposal and athletic running. Ratten appears to continue Pagan's old school philosophies. He is
being protected by the fact that he has a better playing list


Now that there is just plain WRONG!!!!

The game now is exactly about getting in and under, because the rules protect the player so much that if you go in hard for the ball, more than likely you will win the ball or a free.
Yes you need you outside players just as much to creat the run, but lets not forget that possession is 9 tenths of the game.

I suggest you take a chill pill and break up the game into segments. Then look at the segments we play well and the one when we don't. You will see that when we play well, we move the ball quickly and accurately and look as good as any team in the comp. The problem is that when you look at the segments where we play bad, it's poor disposal and lack of intesity from certain players that kill any momentum we have. This is where you can critisize the coach, however I don't see the bad sections as bad coaching, but bad execution of skills and laziness. Now some of this can be blamed on the coach, but for the most part it's more to do with a losing culture and lack of development over the years.


There are 4 or 5 key points that the coach can have some real imput: fitness, strength, player selection, skill development and game plan.


1. Ratten has stated that his focus was to have fittness improved to peak mid way through the season rather than doing hard pre seasons to get player primed for round 1. This would make some sense given the extreemly young list we have and the risk of breakdown of young players over the long season. I am prepared to see how this plays out in the timeframe Ratts has set.

2. We have the youngest playing side in the comp. Expecting our players to have the strength required is beyond the coaches ability as it takes 2 pre-seasons at least to develop the strength needed.

3. Agree fully on this one, but I think that 3 weeks isn't long enough to see how he manages the selections and what style of coach he is

4.Skill development and gameplan are one in the same. If you don't possess the skills then you will not be able to play the gameplan. I believe that Ratts has doubled the amount of skills drill work than what they were doing under Pagan. The fruits of this labour will take time, how much is anyones guess, but after 3 rounds I can see an improvement from last years. Coming from so far back our skills are still very ordinary, but at least there is some there unlike previous years.

Is Ratts the man for the job or its it Jobs for the boys, well no-one can answer that for at least another year. He is OUR coach for the moment and I will support him fully, I just hope that all the players do the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:55 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
We had so many of our players that did well but we still lost. Fevola, Judd, Stevens, Murphy, Jamo, Betts, Kruezer (and others) all had excellent games.

It is clear that our game plan is CRAP. We urgently need to start moving the ball down the centre. We need to move the ball fast to the best available position .. long or short option. We need to carry the ball and link up. And I rekon we need to go man on man.

Taking the ball wide .. tempo football is suicide in todays game. We need to take a lead from Geelong and Hawthorn ... and we need to do it now.

Please Ratts ... we have a team that can compete ... change this crappy game plan NOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:26 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Is this the same Brett Ratten who said Simon Wiggins will be a 200 game player for Carlton? the same Brett Ratten who suggested Adam Bentick should wear his number 7..... we are doooomed!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:40 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 713
Location: New York
I love the way people think that Ratten inherited a stellar team. We were getting flogged by 10 goal plus margins when he took over and that was a team that had a lot more senior players in it than we have now. Some people need to have more realistic expectations of where we are at. I can't believe how quickly some have turned on Ratts.

_________________
I send an SOS to the world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:45 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
fjanyc wrote:
I can't believe how quickly some have turned on Ratts.


Haven't turned on him, just asking some questions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:51 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Melvey wrote:
fjanyc wrote:
I can't believe how quickly some have turned on Ratts.


Haven't turned on him, just asking some questions.


Questions that have no real validity for at least another half-dozen matches....

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:55 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Melvey wrote:
fjanyc wrote:
I can't believe how quickly some have turned on Ratts.


Haven't turned on him, just asking some questions.


Questions that have no real validity for at least another half-dozen matches....


QFMFT

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:19 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6337
I think this topic would be better around August this year but 3 things


1 Anyone who reckons that we have played a team who is any good are kidding themselves(that includes StKilda) and our biggest teat so far comes up this Sunday.

2 We have too many soft players who have been allowed to play because our lists have been so ordinary. This would be an area Ratten must address now.

3 We must have a situation like Geelong have where their reserves team can play alltheir list in VFL firsts. Anyone who has seen the standard of VFL seconds know what I am talking about. This would increase the development of our young players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:24 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Melvey wrote:
Is this the same Brett Ratten who said Simon Wiggins will be a 200 game player for Carlton? the same Brett Ratten who suggested Adam Bentick should wear his number 7..... we are doooomed!!!


Would you prefer that he said our players are crap and gee if we had (insert name here) we would have won the game etc.

I would take a coach who talks up his players every day of the week and twice on Sundays over one that thinks he doesn't have the cattle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:57 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Steve_C7 wrote:
Would you prefer that he said our players are crap and gee if we had (insert name here) we would have won the game etc.

I would take a coach who talks up his players every day of the week and twice on Sundays over one that thinks he doesn't have the cattle.


Nobody knows what this team's been through etc etc......

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
I started this thread and it was never meant to mean bash Ratten. It is about illuminating worrying signs that are indicative of the coach and his department. These are

a) No apparent fitness improvement

b) No strength tackling improvement

c) Questionable team selections (O'hailpin, Bannister)

d) Questionable positional placings (Waite)


It is better that Ratten starts working on these problems now rather than wait. Given that he has most of the resources in place he has not got the same time frame as Pagan.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:44 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:02 am
Posts: 629
Michael Jezz wrote:
I started this thread and it was never meant to mean bash Ratten. It is about illuminating worrying signs that are indicative of the coach and his department. These are

a) No apparent fitness improvement

b) No strength tackling improvement

c) Questionable team selections (O'hailpin, Bannister)

d) Questionable positional placings (Waite)


It is better that Ratten starts working on these problems now rather than wait. Given that he has most of the resources in place he has not got the same time frame as Pagan.


Some poeple here aren't really in a position to judge here. Ratt's aint the fitness coach (they look ok to me) and I think he'd have a better idea about selections and positions (and know what he has to work with). I think he has started working on a few problems for the team and Waite is a good move. We've been competitive in every game with possibly the worst backline in history. It aint gonna happen overnight, but it will happen. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 3:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
I wrote the longest post on this, and the server lost it!

I'll sum it up quickly though for the readers at home...

all four of Michael Jezz's arguments are bunkum and the original post should be on the Punt Road End.

There we go.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 3:24 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4624
keogh wrote:
I think this topic would be better around August this year but 3 things


1 Anyone who reckons that we have played a team who is any good are kidding themselves(that includes StKilda) and our biggest teat so far comes up this Sunday.



I just can't wait for my big teat this Sunday! :lol:

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 5:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Hey, what happened to my post?

Summing up

a)Ratts said fittnes would peak mid year

b) We have a young team and no Lappin, Kouta, Whitnall, Wiggons, Sadington,Bentick etc that were playing last year. How would you expect stronger bodies than last year based on that?

c) Maybe, but unless you in the inner workings of the club, how are we to know if the selections are right or wrong?

d) I like the experimenting of Waite at CHB. Ratts is a least playing players in the positions they were drafted for. Kruez played ruck not back pocket, Gibbs playing stints in the guts etc. Maybe Hoops should be playing forward, but I'll let Ratts do his thing and then only judge him on one question come years end. Do we know who will be our FB, CHB, Ruck and CHF. Already we can safely say that Jamison will be our FB, Waite will be our CHB, Kruiz and Hampson our rucks, we just don't know who our CHF will be yet. That already is a marked improvement from just 6 weeks ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 5:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
Melvey wrote:

I heard Grant Thomas make a great point over the weekend saying everyone harps on about the importance of leg speed. He said its not the leg speed but the speed with which the ball is moved. The guts of the cats midfield Bartel, Kelly, Selwood and Ling are not quick at all. But there movement of the ball is just precise, skillful quick movement with players running to the right spots and creating the quick flow on.



Spot on post Melvey this is so true.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 89 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 732 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group