Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 8:29 am

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 3
  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
mjonc
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:32 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
tommi wrote:
Jammo's got a gun..................

i LOVE that song..............!


kindest regards tommi


The defense won't come undone ...

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888
Top
 Profile  
 
TheBluesMuse
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:35 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
T Bird can now start havng fun...

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger
Top
 Profile  
 
dannyboy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:37 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
Is Jamo allowed to play this year or what? Cos I heard that his groin was sitched into Judd's (by a reputable Vet) and now only one of them can play at a time.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!
Top
 Profile  
 
Jarusa
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
dpuhalov, good luck with that second post.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|
Top
 Profile  
 
grrofunger
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:53 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
Warby wrote:
I just heard that the Yanks have landed on the Moon.....are they allowed to do that?


never happened :wink:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.
Top
 Profile  
 
get rid of the hacks
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
budzy wrote:
dpuhalov wrote:

Read a quick little article in the Herald Sun that mentioned, that because the Blues don't have any players on the veterans list, they are able to nominate 2 rookies that can play for the seniors and will be paid any agreed amount.

Will they be getting financially short-changed by virtually being 'primary list players' playing most games while being on rookie wages? :?


Firstly it says he will be the best paid rookie in the AFL

He is not being short changed, he is being given a wonderful opportunity.
A rookie on another teams list would have all the same commitments, but may have no opportunity to get a senior game and earn senior match payments because he is not a nominated rookie.

Base wage for a rookie is not much less than that for a late round draft selection in their respective first 2 years.
It is match payments that are paid on top of this and will generate more than double his base salary if he is a regular.
Top
 Profile  
 
jezzarules
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 5994
Can a nominated rookie be traded to another club?

_________________
░L░I░N░K░I░N░B░I░O ░
Top
 Profile  
 
Deano Supremo
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
TheBluesMuse wrote:
T Bird can now start havng fun...


What did Denis Pagan dooooo

What did he put you throughhhhh

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.
Top
 Profile  
 
thehalford
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 6:33 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:52 am
Posts: 12809
grrofunger wrote:
Warby wrote:
I just heard that the Yanks have landed on the Moon.....are they allowed to do that?


never happened :wink:


:jarrahwhite:

http://youtube.com/user/WhiteJarrah

:P

_________________
Cer 'ch 'n alluog Blues
Top
 Profile  
 
keogh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:43 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6435
Yeah read it coudnt be happier.

Jamison and hampson will be the finds of the year

Jamison is what we need in defence A natural defender with size.
Top
 Profile  
 
KoRn
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:27 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:23 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Melbourne
Jamison shouldn't be in the rookies list at the first place. He is in our best 22.
Top
 Profile  
 
16 flags
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:07 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:27 am
Posts: 236
Asolute agreement KoRn Jamo is in our best 22

_________________
We're getting closer to 17
Top
 Profile  
 
budzy
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:31 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
get rid of the hacks wrote:
budzy wrote:
dpuhalov wrote:

Read a quick little article in the Herald Sun that mentioned, that because the Blues don't have any players on the veterans list, they are able to nominate 2 rookies that can play for the seniors and will be paid any agreed amount.

Will they be getting financially short-changed by virtually being 'primary list players' playing most games while being on rookie wages? :?


Firstly it says he will be the best paid rookie in the AFL

He is not being short changed, he is being given a wonderful opportunity.
A rookie on another teams list would have all the same commitments, but may have no opportunity to get a senior game and earn senior match payments because he is not a nominated rookie.

Base wage for a rookie is not much less than that for a late round draft selection in their respective first 2 years.
It is match payments that are paid on top of this and will generate more than double his base salary if he is a regular.

Near enough isn't good enough.

Jamo should be on the primary list.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
get rid of the hacks
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:53 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
budzy wrote:
get rid of the hacks wrote:
budzy wrote:
dpuhalov wrote:

Read a quick little article in the Herald Sun that mentioned, that because the Blues don't have any players on the veterans list, they are able to nominate 2 rookies that can play for the seniors and will be paid any agreed amount.

Will they be getting financially short-changed by virtually being 'primary list players' playing most games while being on rookie wages? :?


Firstly it says he will be the best paid rookie in the AFL

He is not being short changed, he is being given a wonderful opportunity.
A rookie on another teams list would have all the same commitments, but may have no opportunity to get a senior game and earn senior match payments because he is not a nominated rookie.

Base wage for a rookie is not much less than that for a late round draft selection in their respective first 2 years.
It is match payments that are paid on top of this and will generate more than double his base salary if he is a regular.

Near enough isn't good enough.

Jamo should be on the primary list.


Ok .....you know better than Swann and Icke who decided he will stay on the rookie and play senior football as a nominated rookie, in the best interests of team.

If he was promoted we we would have missed out on either Armfield or Pfieffer, but had an extra rookie spot.
Top
 Profile  
 
budzy
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:01 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
get rid of the hacks wrote:
budzy wrote:
get rid of the hacks wrote:
budzy wrote:
dpuhalov wrote:

Read a quick little article in the Herald Sun that mentioned, that because the Blues don't have any players on the veterans list, they are able to nominate 2 rookies that can play for the seniors and will be paid any agreed amount.

Will they be getting financially short-changed by virtually being 'primary list players' playing most games while being on rookie wages? :?


Firstly it says he will be the best paid rookie in the AFL

He is not being short changed, he is being given a wonderful opportunity.
A rookie on another teams list would have all the same commitments, but may have no opportunity to get a senior game and earn senior match payments because he is not a nominated rookie.

Base wage for a rookie is not much less than that for a late round draft selection in their respective first 2 years.
It is match payments that are paid on top of this and will generate more than double his base salary if he is a regular.

Near enough isn't good enough.

Jamo should be on the primary list.


Ok .....you know better than Swann and Icke who decided he will stay on the rookie and play senior football as a nominated rookie, in the best interests of team.

If he was promoted we we would have missed out on either Armfield or Pfieffer, but had an extra rookie spot.

Perhaps we could've come to an arrangement with Saddo and the Bullants to free up a spot for Jamo on the primary list.

If Jamo is set to play most games for Carlton he should be on the primary list.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
mjonc
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:10 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
It doesn't matter if he is on the Primary list or Rookie List, the fact is he will play seniors from Round 1 to Round 23.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888
Top
 Profile  
 
molsey
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:13 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
http://www.carltonfc.com.au/tabid/4311/ ... wsId=55525

As confirmed by David Ellard,
Top
 Profile  
 
budzy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:14 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
mjonc wrote:
It doesn't matter if he is on the Primary list or Rookie List, the fact is he will play seniors from Round 1 to Round 23.

So why is he on the rookie list? Money???

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
Clayman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
budzy wrote:
mjonc wrote:
It doesn't matter if he is on the Primary list or Rookie List, the fact is he will play seniors from Round 1 to Round 23.

So why is he on the rookie list? Money???


So we could pick a player in the Pre season draft. Ratten said as much on 2AY yesterday, your 3AW.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
budzy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:40 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Clayman wrote:
budzy wrote:
mjonc wrote:
It doesn't matter if he is on the Primary list or Rookie List, the fact is he will play seniors from Round 1 to Round 23.

So why is he on the rookie list? Money???


So we could pick a player in the Pre season draft. Ratten said as much on 2AY yesterday, your 3AW.

As I said before, perhaps Saddo could've made way for Jamo??

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 3
  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 46 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group