Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
An Interesting Read

Some interesting VFL perspectives in this thread.

I really thought there might have been some marketing opportunities and well as real development benefits to going it alone in the VFL at Princes Park.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
The disappointment could be something which is bearable if there's the probability that we're looking at going alone in 2009, and that shoring up the quality of the seniors side is the first step, followed by the resurrection of a Carlton VFL side to aid development.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
According to the thread I linked to above it is a five year deal.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Pah. Like I'm going to bother reading that! :lol:

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:10 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:14 pm
Posts: 911
Location: Canberra
Jarusa wrote:
An Interesting Read

Some interesting VFL perspectives in this thread.

I really thought there might have been some marketing opportunities and well as real development benefits to going it alone in the VFL at Princes Park.


It doesn't matter where you go does it? I can understand the feelings of the bullants faithful at what could be seen as a takeover. BUT - as the thread says, there were financial problems and they were a poor performing club. Now they're neither. I don't think a thankyou is in order, but some level-headed thought should see that the benefit of the club is served by the partnership. And Carlton needs to realise that the bullants should be left in a position where they COULD stand on their own but choose not to. Which would mean that the social/homeground posiyion is left there when carlton does eventually end the relationship. In my opinion...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Jarusa wrote:
An Interesting Read

Some interesting VFL perspectives in this thread.

I really thought there might have been some marketing opportunities and well as real development benefits to going it alone in the VFL at Princes Park.


I don't fully understand the benefits, pitfalls, whys and wherefors of the relationship with the Bullants, but after reading that thread it doesn't seem like there's much love coming from the red side of the fence.

Carlton needs to have some say over the way the Bullants is run for the obvious fact that a large part of our future is running around in their side, that's simply prudent management from our point of view.

Don't think I'll tick the Bullants membership box when I renew my Carlton membership in 2008 though. :?

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
camelboy wrote:
Don't think I'll tick the Bullants membership box when I renew my Carlton membership in 2008 though. :?


I know what you mean. It doesn't look like it would be appreciated in any way.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
I guess there's only one way to find out why they think what they think. ;)

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:54 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
Andain wrote:
wasthesonofapreacherman wrote:
What's wrong with Barry Mitchell? What he applied for a position he believed he could fulfill? So if your boss was old, had no-idea, and someone offered you a chance to apply for his position (the most influencial on field position at any club) you'd refuse, even when you'd been virtually guaranteed he wouldn't be there too much longer.

Get a grip, what's he done wrong. He's coached well, considering we have been the shittest team in the competition and everyone else's 2nd's (that the bullants are playing against) would make our 1st's!


He's in charge of player development and our player development is a disgrace. Any other club in the AFL would give Mitchell the sack. I didn't believe all the boys club talk but if Mitchell survives...
Our players have developed pretty well individually, it's just that they haven't developed properly as a team. The appropriate person was sacked for that one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18042
Andain wrote:
He's in charge of player development and our player development is a disgrace. Any other club in the AFL would give Mitchell the sack. I didn't believe all the boys club talk but if Mitchell survives...


Until a month ago he was'nt allowed near the players. :?
He couldnt attend training or even be around the football department.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:06 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Mitchell was coach of the Northern Bullants & not a CFC development coach, thanks to DP.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
I think you'll find he was in charge of player development.

Not a big fan of his. If he is Bullants coach and isnt one of the 2 development coaches, I can live with it. Would prefer he isnt involved at Carlton along with Libba

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Molly wrote:
It is all easy to get sentimental and say that we should have our own VFL side again.

But people on this site are really getting a name at the moment for over-scrutinising every move the club makes. I don't think some of you will be satisfied until the Board agrees to run all decisions past a binding vote of TC :shock:

Not so long ago someone actually suggested something very similar :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
The whole alignment issue, not surprisingly, seems to bring issues no matter who is involved. According to the thread below, on page 2, Collingwood are splitting from Williamstown...

http://www.vflfooty.com/modules.php?nam ... pic&t=1703

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:11 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 381
Location: Melbourne
Barry however has been instrumental in the Bullants move to PP.

His office is there of course, in the Legends stand, but with Brett they really want to be able to have access to the kids 'all' the time.

Apparently the Carlton off field arrogance is returning too.

Now Dick is back at the helm, we are treating the Ants like we did the Roys and the Hawks when they had 'paid the right' to use our ground.

This is all Ant music by the way!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:39 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
Molly I hear what you're saying.

But...

After enduring year after year of clearly mind-bogglingly stupid decisions by previous regimes at our club, I'm not in the least surprised that our supporter base is somewhat cynical and a little gunshy when it comes to the decisions being made on our behalf.

Yes, the new board and Swann etc are clearly doing all the right things, and for that we should all be grateful. But I don't think you dismiss the effects of years of incompetence as easily as that.

The guys in charge now (with the usual caveat on the suitability of Sticks in any decision-making capacity) are deserving of our faith. But no-one should forget that it was a LACK of scrutiny on our part that led us into this mess, and an UNWILLINGNESS to accept sub-par performances that led the supporter base to turf Smogon out and pave the way for Mr.Pratt.

Considering how poorly our club was run over a decade at least, I think an overly negative perception from supporters is unavoidable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: Elwood
Synbad wrote:
Great move for the time being but the club needs to make that marriage work for it.
The Bullants are Northern suburbs and we have had a few players from that area on our list/
Kouta
Ang Christou
Scotto
Stevens
Lance
and KREUZER!!!

So lets go farming the northern suburbs for members and supporters also.
It has a rich history of footballers and football.
We should be using the Bullants/Knights for intelligence of kids coming through the area. Just as Geelong have an advantage in identifying and recognising Falcons kids better than anybody else.

To me its a massive plus. If it can be harnessed and used to our advantage.


Bring back zones Synbad ???? Could it be done ?Not would it but could it ?

_________________
I know a little secret. And i'm not sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:48 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:20 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Melbourne
Not unhappy with the alliance continuing and most of the youngsters only have good things to say about Mitchell. Can understand not wanting to play at Cramer St as the surface was suffering through lack of water this year and Princes Park still has a great surface. Also I think that the Princes Park Social club would offer more opportunities to provide packages for sponsors of the Bullants.

Certainly a lot more communication between Mitchell and Ratten and the Bullants are really starting to get their act together. Financially they seem to have turned the corner and they are already establishing closer links with the local leagues and Northern Knights to allow a pathway and opportunites for young footballers. They obviously need to look at some form of water storage for the ground and if they can get a social club set up with pokies they will be off and running.

I think the big issue is not the Bullants or our own VFL side but the lack of a dedicated team to develop the youngsters. A group whose sole purpose is to hone and improve skills through individually aligned training. Our senior and reserve coaches jobs are to set strategies and win matches whilst developing the team not to spend an extra 5 hours per week with each player going over videos practising a particular skill and eradicating bad habits. We want our youngsters to step up into the senior team and look like they belong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:11 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Number of AFL teams with a VFL affiliation to win a premiership = 0.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:26 pm
Posts: 1771
Location: Not bloody close enough to the action!!
Jarusa wrote:
Number of AFL teams with a VFL affiliation to win a premiership = 0.


Sandringham x 2, Jars. Affiliated with the Dees, yes?

_________________
2002:> "In their Masters Chambers
They Gathered for their Feast
They Stabbed us with their Steely Knives
But They Just Can't Kill The Beast!" <2016

THE BLUEBAGGER BEAST IS BAACKK!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mymanmurph and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group