Blue Vain wrote:
The Duke wrote:
[I know DP had to go, and I'm pleased Ratten's got the job, but in reality there's little difference in the results of the two collingwood games.
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_m ... s?mid=2960http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_m ... s?mid=3048You can put any kind of spin you like, but in reality the team was going okay until they dropped their heads and got smacked a couple of times. Maybe that was Pagan, maybe it was too long with no success but whatever the reason, we're still in a similar spot to round 11.
Hows this for "spin"?
The team that lost by 24 points earlier this year had an average age of 23 and 11 months with 76 games experience.
The team that went out on Saturday was over a year younger on average per player (22/10) and an average games total of 48!
Apparently that was the youngest Carlton team for 37 years.
Whats more, they were the best part of 2 years younger than the team that we were leading for most of the game.
If you see no difference in the 2 teams and the spirit they played with, you're watching a different team to me.
I quoted this site for the stats and scores of the game. I agree it also mentions the average age and games played, but I'd be doing a bit more research on that before quoting in for absolute truth

.
For example, it says we played 14 players with 50 games or under experience. Sounds good, yeah? Find me 14 players with less than 50 games under their belts on that list. Also mentions the 150+ gamers at 0 but we played Saddington and Houlihan from memory

.
I'm happy it was the youngest team in 37 years, and I believe they're playing well under the circumstances, but let's not fool ourselves that Ratts in and DP out is the answer to all our preyers just yet.