Synbad wrote:
Youre abit biased if you really are using that as an argument.
Pagan cant develop because he doesnt understand modern day football.
Gibbs defender
Seens Gibbs can see the point -
Quote:
But Gibbs, 18, rated his fifth-game clash with triple-premiership utility Johnson as a positive experience.
"I learnt where to run, when to lead, double back and go again. I am picking up little bits and pieces which has been handy," Gibbs said ahead of tomorrow night's match against Port Adelaide at Telstra Dome.
"I am getting thrown in there, but I am happy just as long as I am doing my part for the team. Denis will move me up the ground a bit more as soon as he feels I am ready."
Gibbs said he's been improved, not scarred, by Pagan's challenges in a side committed to playing one-on-one football.
"Denis hasn't put too much pressure on me," said Gibbs, who eclipsed Western Bulldogs star Jason Akermanis at the MCG on Sunday to earn the Round 10 NAB Rising Star nomination.
"It puts in the accountability side to your game. It's been important and will hold me in good stead.
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,21867778%255E19742,00.html
I wonder why Malthouse doesn't play the Shaws in the midfield or in the forward line? And Lockyer has spent a lot of time as a back pocket. None of those decisions have been bad ones. It also doesn't seem to have hurt Lindsay Gilbee. Aussie Jones started out as a forward or mid, and then switched to back pocket.
Why have successive coaches played Wirrapunda in the back pocket? He's a bit like Houla, don't you think? Plays loose but if he's on he provides a lot of rebound.
Rebound. That word again. Keeps coming up in the modern game. Maybe Pagan wants to have rebounding defenders like Scotland? If so, that's hardly the tell-tale sign of a coach struggling with the modern game. Not that he needed to play copycat. David King was a pretty decent modern rebounding half-back flanker.
Strange that all of the players you nominated have continued to improve (perhaps with the exception of Skinny who's on the decline now).
In particular, Carrazzo would have to be a testament to good development. He came to us as a rookie reject from Geelong. His ability to lock down opponents won him selection when his difficulties with kicking would have made it difficult for him to play forward or even in the midfield. Now he is well-rounded player able to play tight or creatively. Far from killing his creativity, he's now able to rack up nearly 40 possessions in some games and kick important goals. He still has a tendency to try to run around 1 too many players and sometimes he gets caught. Next time you see that, try telling yourself that his flair has been eradicated.
Surely, your question about the game plan is rhetorical. TheGame knows what it is, even if he thinks it's too predictable and inflexible.
And yes, it is sustainable. With another preseason to refine it, it will be less predictable. But in order to recalibrate the decision-making of the players, it was entirely appropriate to tell them to concentrate of backing themselves and running or kicking the ball forward quickly, even if uncontested possessions aren't possible. They can develop alternative styles once they've mastered the central theme.
But the most important thing is that the players appear to fully support this style. They enjoy playing it as it gives great opportunities to show their flair. They don't have to chip sideways for fear of making a mistake. They can go to a contest inside 50 and give blokes with the X factor like Waite every chance of doing the incredible.