TruBlueBrad wrote:
Ockham's Razor wrote:
G'day Sydney,
Quote:
so I take Ockham you think Pagan is beyond approach he is at an elite level that he shouldn't have to answer to the people who are paying for his salary - If it was good enough for board members to come on here why should Pagan be exempt - and how do you know I haven't tried to contact him before
Denis is not beyond "approach", nor even reproach. My post actually suggested 3 methods by which he could be contacted in a polite, professional manner.
I read your post and laughed when SB suggested you thought Pagan was beyond approach.
As for Walker 'tagging' Thomas on Saturday.....SB, do you believe Andrew McLeod is played at half-back to 'tag' an opposition player?
I'm sure you had a good chuckle to yourself TBB but I didn't realise I had logged on to Talking Grammer .
Now its interesting that you would bring out the long bow and draw a comparison with Mcleod and Walker . Considering these two sides game plans couldn't be further apart . Craig has all his moves generated from the backline his plan is totally defensive if it cant be simulated on the computor it doesn't get done and yet he still allows one of his ball players in Mcleod free license to use his creativity and launch most of their forward movement through him.
Pagan on the other hand plays quick movement attacking kick it to the hot spot brand of football which requires players to do a lot of running be able to break lines and kick long and direct -and have big petrol tanks to last out the game All of these attributes we have seen in Walker .
so explain to me why again Walker was chasing some hairy arse kid from Collingwood around the MCG again