Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 5:14 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 10:43 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 902
Synbad wrote:

Quote:
... easily a better prospect going into the future than Lance...


You are so predictable fella, tell us something new why don't you?

So would you say Jack Riewoldt is a "better prospect going into the future " than Richo at the Tigers? Is Travis Boak a "better prospect going into the future " than a Josh Mahoney at Port. Is David Armitage a "better prospect going into the future " than a Robert Harvey at St Kilda? Is Muston a "better prospect going into the future " than Shane Crawford at Hawthorn? Of course they all are - but there is much more to picking a senior 22 than who is a "better prospect going into the future " - I thought even you knew that Synbad.

Hey I've got an idea - why don't we get the Bullants seniors play for Carlton this Friday night & the Carlton team can get their red & white gear out this weekend.

BORING!!!!!!!!!!! :roll: :roll: :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 10:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
lucablue wrote:
Synbad wrote:

Quote:
... easily a better prospect going into the future than Lance...


You are so predictable fella, tell us something new why don't you?

So would you say Jack Riewoldt is a "better prospect going into the future " than Richo at the Tigers? Is Travis Boak a "better prospect going into the future " than a Josh Mahoney at Port. Is David Armitage a "better prospect going into the future " than a Robert Harvey at St Kilda? Is Muston a "better prospect going into the future " than Shane Crawford at Hawthorn? Of course they all are - but there is much more to picking a senior 22 than who is a "better prospect going into the future " - I thought even you knew that Synbad.

Hey I've got an idea - why don't we get the Bullants seniors play for Carlton this Friday night & the Carlton team can get their red & white gear out this weekend.

BORING!!!!!!!!!!! :roll: :roll: :roll:


Crawford is a modern day footballer who trains hard to be fit and he leads by example.....

Would love him instead of Lance...

As a matter of fact there is no 200 gamer from any club that i wouldnt want before Lance...

Lance should be dropped tomake way for youth who we must pin our hopes on... cos the only thing that can be pinned on Lancewith any surity is that he is the most unprofessional player currently to have played as many games as Lance has played.

Thats just another indictment to why this footy club has had 5 years of nothingness.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 11:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
Man you dont stop Synbad

Every post is Lance blah blah blah Lance blah blah blah Lance Blah blah Blah

Just give it a rest you are so Lance obsessed its getting like your Shane Whitnall i reckon you prob Dream about Lance every night ... must be some nightmare where some Kid in your child hood with Red hair beat you up or something :roll:

I think everyone knows your opinion on Lance

Can imagine the day in the life of Synbad .. go to the bank .. Teller looks like Lance short changed me ... hmmm that guy cut me off at the lights must be lance ,,,,

Your Opinion on Lance is noted inagine posting 10000 entries of Lance ... I reckon you would contribute to 10000 entries on Lance Whitnall on Google search

_________________
CFC TAC Squad everyone over 25 must be traded sounds like Loguns Run


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 12:00 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 280
Give him his own thread with all this crap will you? Then maybe everyone who hasn't read it "ad nauseum" will be able to read it all at once, and the rest of us won't have to read this tripe in almost every topic on the site. You people are supposed to moderate - how about you do it?
Yawns again......

Hey, I just got my 50th post after 2 and a half years. Whhooooo hooooooo!!!

_________________
Footytalk Has NEW HOME.
Visit them at www.footytalk.com.au and have a look around.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 12:25 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24699
Location: Bondi Beach
Synbad may be repetitive and scathing regarding Lance, and yeah he's a bit harsh on Red, but I'm sure and agree there is good reasons for him to be disappointed in Lance 2007.

Plus it's relevant point to raise for this thread.

Lance may play himself into form...sure enough the MC are giving him every opportunity. He had a great first half on Sat, but went missing for the whole second half ...fatigued.

Lance is not in good condition imo, and I think everyone has given up on questioning Lance's position in the firsts because the MC wont make the hard decision, and we're taking him for granted. I don't like that.

If I was coach Lance would be knockin on the door from preseason and perhaps Blackers would be in, or maybe even keep Anderson in.
In the St Kilda game discussion I suggested

OUT: Jackson Wiggins Anderson
IN: Hartlett Bower Edwards

Anderson didn't do much wrong though. I just thought I'd throw him in for 3 changes. If we weren't playing St Kilda, I'd be advocating dropping Ackland.

I do believe Hartlett or Kennedy would be good around the ground and they should be able to hold CHB and CHF. Maybe Kennedy is a CHB. Who knows?

What I think both have is presence. They bring the ball to the ground if they don't mark. IMO they should be more dominant in the air with their marking. I love the way Kennedy is always getting his hands and body to a contest and keeps on competing. Worth keeping him in...he makes us look and play bigger.

Bower is a gun, attacking defender. He was not loose last year on Barry Hall in round 22, and proved to have the right attributes for a modern day footballer; height and pace.

I'm sure Benjamin and Grigg will make it; injury has robbed them of opportunity. I think both of these players and Anderson will overtake Blackers, but in terms of readiness, Blackers would have to be ahead atm. Does Blackers warrant a position right now? Imo, No.

I've got a feeling that Raso will make a name for himself in the second half of this season...call it gut feeling. :wink: and it's still too early in the season to judge Aisake and Flint who have been sidelined with injury, let alone the fact that in any other team, they would be expected to serve their apprenticeship in the magoos.

Aisake will surprise...I'd even put him in for Ackland atm. What have we got to lose? Not a flag! :wink:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:55 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 697
Rambo Stallone wrote:
reading all this the forgotten man Adam Hartlett,where is Anthony Raso, his very quiet except that interview they did


Apparently he was close to our best in the bullants reserves on the weekend. Hopefully along with Benjamin will be promoted to the bullants ones in the next week or 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 7:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Wolfe wrote:
Man you dont stop Synbad

Every post is Lance blah blah blah Lance blah blah blah Lance Blah blah Blah

Just give it a rest you are so Lance obsessed its getting like your Shane Whitnall i reckon you prob Dream about Lance every night ... must be some nightmare where some Kid in your child hood with Red hair beat you up or something :roll:

I think everyone knows your opinion on Lance

Can imagine the day in the life of Synbad .. go to the bank .. Teller looks like Lance short changed me ... hmmm that guy cut me off at the lights must be lance ,,,,

Your Opinion on Lance is noted inagine posting 10000 entries of Lance ... I reckon you would contribute to 10000 entries on Lance Whitnall on Google search


Sorry.. but why would i stop???
Its not like he is playing well.. or leading well.. or dragging the side over the line...all he is doing is presenting himself in a very unfit manner... and not making any meaningful contribution as he keeps another kid out of the side.... and no.. no kid with red hair ever beat me up "or something"...
Why do you have red hair...???.... and wanna wave the flag or something???

In the meantime you post some real drivel... but you know what???.. i dont read it most of it... ... or complain.. its your right as a member of this forum...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:12 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6321
lucablue wrote:
Synbad wrote:

Quote:
... easily a better prospect going into the future than Lance...


You are so predictable fella, tell us something new why don't you?

So would you say Jack Riewoldt is a "better prospect going into the future " than Richo at the Tigers? Is Travis Boak a "better prospect going into the future " than a Josh Mahoney at Port. Is David Armitage a "better prospect going into the future " than a Robert Harvey at St Kilda? Is Muston a "better prospect going into the future " than Shane Crawford at Hawthorn? Of course they all are - but there is much more to picking a senior 22 than who is a "better prospect going into the future " - I thought even you knew that Synbad.

Hey I've got an idea - why don't we get the Bullants seniors play for Carlton this Friday night & the Carlton team can get their red & white gear out this weekend.

BORING!!!!!!!!!!! :roll: :roll: :roll:







I dont thinks its boring. repepitive yes but not boring.

We got the Pizza with the lot from Lance on Sat night. Awesome Lance first half. Shades of 2000 .Last quarter with game on the line on bench for part of it doesnt get near the pigskin whilst their leaders bring it home for the youngsters and most of us are happy that big Red has found touch again yet our captain are most experienced player except for Lappin doesnt touch the aggot. That folks isnt good enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:39 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2452
Location: Princess Park
I thought this post was about Hartlett and Bower.

Oh well it seems every problem in the world at the moment is caused by Lance - easy target.

Do you know that Lance struggles to walk after each game and in fact it's a battle to get him right for each game. Lance spends most time in the pool to get him right for the following week. I know this is no excuse and if he isn't fit he shouldn't be playing. Lance needs to have a good preseason to set him up for the year. He had a shit of a preseason due to knee problems - not his fault.

His first half against the Lions was great and I doubt he can play at that level for 4 quaters. May be he should be played more of the bench after half time.

If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:41 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:59 pm
Posts: 2966
Location: La La Land
I didn't see Hartlett as being very influential in the game either & don't agree with everyone saying he should be playing. I really think that to get a game in the seniors you really need to be dominating at VFL level & I don't really see anyone doing that.

Edwards played a good game on the weekend but I don't think he should be promoted just yet - let's see if he can get some consistent performances together first.

Bower really frustrated me. He was loose all day & didn't really do much damage with his disposal. He tries to take everyone on & almost gets caught rather than using the first option of a quick handball to a player that is running past. He seems to not like to get in and win a hard ball but instead, drops off the pack & waits for the easy receive. It may be his role I don't know but it gets a little frustrating.

_________________
Witty signature required.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:18 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Blue4ever wrote:
I thought this post was about Hartlett and Bower.

Oh well it seems every problem in the world at the moment is caused by Lance - easy target.

Do you know that Lance struggles to walk after each game and in fact it's a battle to get him right for each game. Lance spends most time in the pool to get him right for the following week. I know this is no excuse and if he isn't fit he shouldn't be playing. Lance needs to have a good preseason to set him up for the year. He had a shit of a preseason due to knee problems - not his fault.

His first half against the Lions was great and I doubt he can play at that level for 4 quaters. May be he should be played more of the bench after half time.

If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.



Synbad has a point and wants nothing more that see Carlton FC at the top. While our captain cannot run out a game, he has a very valid point. Great that Lance had a good first half - so he should he is our captain! We just do not have the leadership. The game was there to be won on Saturday night, they had the leadership showing how it should be done, we didn't - that is why they won.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 12:43 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2452
Location: Princess Park
Taff wrote:
Blue4ever wrote:
I thought this post was about Hartlett and Bower.

Oh well it seems every problem in the world at the moment is caused by Lance - easy target.

Do you know that Lance struggles to walk after each game and in fact it's a battle to get him right for each game. Lance spends most time in the pool to get him right for the following week. I know this is no excuse and if he isn't fit he shouldn't be playing. Lance needs to have a good preseason to set him up for the year. He had a shit of a preseason due to knee problems - not his fault.

His first half against the Lions was great and I doubt he can play at that level for 4 quaters. May be he should be played more of the bench after half time.

If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.



Synbad has a point and wants nothing more that see Carlton FC at the top. While our captain cannot run out a game, he has a very valid point. Great that Lance had a good first half - so he should he is our captain! We just do not have the leadership. The game was there to be won on Saturday night, they had the leadership showing how it should be done, we didn't - that is why they won.


Yes the Lions had the leadership and skill at the end. Names like Brown, Black, Power, Charman, Copeland, Johnson, Notting etc etc etc ........
These players have played in premiership sides.

Please list our experienced players.........

See it's all Lances fault, he is the reason we have won three spoons :roll:

We have the youth coming through to compare to other side. We do not have enough leadership. Lance needs support!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Quote:
Synbad has a point and wants nothing more that see Carlton FC at the top. While our captain cannot run out a game, he has a very valid point.


Yeah he does have a valid point, but I think other posters validly point out that it is a point made in almost all of his 10,000 posts.

Synbad we know what you think about Lance, were you happy with Fev's leadership skills last Friday, or is it a case of Fev being above criticism. I am sure you wouldn't excuse Whit standing talking to umpires while his team mates fight for the ball 5 metres away.

Anyway, I'd like to see Edwards and Bower in on the weekend. Hartlett for Kennedy maybe, but he didn't set the house on fire on the weekend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:08 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 96
Spot on bluegirldanielle about Bower.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:37 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Blue4ever wrote:
If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.

But Lance is the leader of the playing group, so shouldn't he lead by example and give his spot to a younger healthier & fitter player who can learn or contribute over the whole 4 qtrs.
21 available players vs 22 available players for a large part of the game isn't fair or acceptable, surely?

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
budzy wrote:
Blue4ever wrote:
If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.

But Lance is the leader of the playing group, so shouldn't he lead by example and give his spot to a younger healthier & fitter player who can learn or contribute over the whole 4 qtrs.
21 available players vs 22 available players for a large part of the game isn't fair or acceptable, surely?

No, but Jacko can't help breaking his wrist.

Go easy on the kid.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:44 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
jimmae wrote:
budzy wrote:
Blue4ever wrote:
If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.

But Lance is the leader of the playing group, so shouldn't he lead by example and give his spot to a younger healthier & fitter player who can learn or contribute over the whole 4 qtrs.
21 available players vs 22 available players for a large part of the game isn't fair or acceptable, surely?

No, but Jacko can't help breaking his wrist.

Go easy on the kid.

20 players!! :roll: no wonder they ran over us :wink:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:49 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:36 pm
Posts: 1289
Location: here
budzy wrote:
jimmae wrote:
budzy wrote:
Blue4ever wrote:
If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.

But Lance is the leader of the playing group, so shouldn't he lead by example and give his spot to a younger healthier & fitter player who can learn or contribute over the whole 4 qtrs.
21 available players vs 22 available players for a large part of the game isn't fair or acceptable, surely?

No, but Jacko can't help breaking his wrist.

Go easy on the kid.

20 players!! :roll: no wonder they ran over us :wink:


Make that 19.5 players

Wiggins (injury or no injury)

_________________
They coud'nt.....could they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:56 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6321
Blue4ever wrote:
I thought this post was about Hartlett and Bower.

Oh well it seems every problem in the world at the moment is caused by Lance - easy target.

Do you know that Lance struggles to walk after each game and in fact it's a battle to get him right for each game. Lance spends most time in the pool to get him right for the following week. I know this is no excuse and if he isn't fit he shouldn't be playing. Lance needs to have a good preseason to set him up for the year. He had a shit of a preseason due to knee problems - not his fault.

His first half against the Lions was great and I doubt he can play at that level for 4 quaters. May be he should be played more of the bench after half time.

If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.




so we were really down to 20 men for the second half with Jackson busting his hand. Sounds like Lance's selection was pretty smart.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
keogh wrote:
Blue4ever wrote:
I thought this post was about Hartlett and Bower.

Oh well it seems every problem in the world at the moment is caused by Lance - easy target.

Do you know that Lance struggles to walk after each game and in fact it's a battle to get him right for each game. Lance spends most time in the pool to get him right for the following week. I know this is no excuse and if he isn't fit he shouldn't be playing. Lance needs to have a good preseason to set him up for the year. He had a shit of a preseason due to knee problems - not his fault.

His first half against the Lions was great and I doubt he can play at that level for 4 quaters. May be he should be played more of the bench after half time.

If he isn't fit enough then the MC need to make the decision and not play him. So may be the shit thrown on Lance should be directed to the people that influence who plays each week.




so we were really down to 20 men for the second half with Jackson busting his hand. Sounds like Lance's selection was pretty smart.

It's comments like yours that undermine how much Lance is giving up for this footy club.

He could be a cripple by the time he turns 30. What a vile bunch you can be.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 140 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group