simonverbeek wrote:
timetodeliver2004 wrote:
I'm really having an issue with comments like this and similar comments that were in the papers about how the disappointing thing for Carlton was that it was the 'experienced' players who did the bulk of the work. I think there is a misconception that we dont have quality experienced players. We do, we have a talented core group of seasoned players - Stevens, Houlihan, Scotland, Kouta, Fev, Whitnall, Thornton etc. It's ridiculous to think that they wont be the standouts this year.
The main change over the past couple of years is that our drafting strategies have enabled us to bring in talented young kids as well. The result of this is that we have 22 players on the field that are up to AFL standard - we are not carrying anyone. For these 'experienced' players, this has a couple of outcomes. Firstly, for the midfielders, we are able to provide a deeper rotation that means they are able to stay fresh. We are able to do this because our second-string midfield is up to AFL standard and will not get smashed. Secondly, it means that opposition teams cant just target a couple of players knowing that if they close them down, we will struggle to win.
It seems like you have your navy blue glasses on ttd2004. Which is better than any other colour I guess! Look, I love your passion for the blues, but the way you talk about us sounds like you think we're finals contenders.
I agree with your comments about our back line, much improved on last year probably which will help.
Can't agree with your assessment of our 'experienced core' compared to other clubs.
If one of us has to be right in the long run, I'd rather it was you! But, personally, most of my hope is placed in our current
list (i.e. the young guys, who I wanna see!), not our current
team.
I guess it comes down to this Simon. And these are the actual facts of the matter regardless of opinions.
A fitness coach and 5 other coaches/assistants who live with the 44 guys day in day out don't agree with throwing the young kids to the wolves if either.
A) they aren't ready,
B) don't deserve it
C) don't suit team balance,
D) don't suit the set up
E) mean the difference between a win/loss
F) means others they really want and need to look at playing new roles miss out
And remember it is the new guys like Rats, Braddles and GC who are making these decisions so don't lump it all on DP head etc etc.
Regards Cazzesman
PS. Maybe if Jars has a lazy afternoon free

he could go through the top 30 draft picks from the 2004 draft (which means the kids are now at the start of their 3rd season) and see how many games those kids have played with their respective teams so far.
I suspect many will have played very few but the results will be interesting across all clubs.