Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:25 am

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
jim
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:50 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
Fabulous wrote:
Any one want Goddard for pick 17???
No. We have enough, play loose, outside midfielders. Need another like a hole in the head, even if he can kick, although kicking to no options go forward continually would challenge him, like it does our better kicks, too. We got Simmo and Fisher that year, might have gone down a different path otherwise.
Top
 Profile  
 
jim
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:50 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
Fabulous wrote:
Any one want Goddard for pick 17???
No. We have enough, play loose, outside midfielders. Need another like a hole in the head, even if he can kick, although kicking to no options go forward continually would challenge him, like it does our better kicks, too. We got Simmo and Fisher that year, might have gone down a different path otherwise.
Top
 Profile  
 
jim
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:51 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
Fabulous wrote:
Any one want Goddard for pick 17???
No. We have enough, play loose, outside midfielders. Need another like a hole in the head, even if he can kick, although kicking to no options go forward continually would challenge him, like it does our better kicks, too. We got Simmo and Fisher that year, might have gone down a different path otherwise.
Top
 Profile  
 
showbag
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:47 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2664
It's alright jim ... we only have one pick 17.
Top
 Profile  
 
Pafloyul
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:04 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
I thought for a second there I was going to have to wade through another 14 of those. :roll: :wink:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.
Top
 Profile  
 
tommi
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:05 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
Hey..........

have i mentioned that Ay Dee hates Carlton before..........?

i mean........really really.....reeeeeally hates Carlton.........!

imagine if i was in charge of the AFL.......and had to make
an un-biased decision on the EssnDoomed..........!

pfffffft.......not bloody likely...........!


kindest regards tommi














reallyreallyHATESCarlton...............!

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!
Top
 Profile  
 
Electric Blue
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:40 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 10076
Well Ay Dee, the feeling is quite mutual and Blues fans should NEVER forget it! :twisted: :evil:

_________________
Oompa loompa doompety dee
If you are wise you'll listen to me
Top
 Profile  
 
The Duke
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:03 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34559
Location: The Brown Wedge
AGRO wrote:
This is no retrospective because the AFL's change in the PRIORITY PICK rules for National Draft 2006:

is nothing more than an extra year of Draft Penalties by stealth - which "The Spew" has gleefully inflicted on us. This is the same arsehole who said the AFL went easy on us in 2002.

The club should be shouting from the highest rooftop that this decision be reversed by the AFL and we should have a Priority Pick in the first Round thus giving us Picks 1 and 2.

We should be making our case to the AFL in the strongest possible terms - and if the AFL reply that changing the rules to this years draft would be "prejudicial" to the draft then we should point out that draft order was changed at the 11th hour in 2002 to penalise us - they can again be changed at the 11th hour to assist us.

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:


Absolutely agree :evil: :evil:

21 wins from 88 games means we should be eligable for 8 of the first ten picks in this years draft. Changing the rules after other clubs milked it for so long and not letting a crippled club get back on its feet is...........

@#$%&! DISGRACEFUL :evil: :evil:

_________________
end of message
Top
 Profile  
 
The Duke
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:34 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34559
Location: The Brown Wedge
Why don't WE instigate a day of action on the AFL to give back the Round 1 priority pick. We should march on AFL house and beat the @#$%&! door down demanding something be done.

We're all pretty good at bringing ourselves down from with-in and shitting in our own nest, why don't we focus our anger at the pricks who have their foot on our clubs throat :evil: .

_________________
end of message
Top
 Profile  
 
bluechucky
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:50 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
The Duke wrote:
AGRO wrote:
This is no retrospective because the AFL's change in the PRIORITY PICK rules for National Draft 2006:

is nothing more than an extra year of Draft Penalties by stealth - which "The Spew" has gleefully inflicted on us. This is the same arsehole who said the AFL went easy on us in 2002.

The club should be shouting from the highest rooftop that this decision be reversed by the AFL and we should have a Priority Pick in the first Round thus giving us Picks 1 and 2.

We should be making our case to the AFL in the strongest possible terms - and if the AFL reply that changing the rules to this years draft would be "prejudicial" to the draft then we should point out that draft order was changed at the 11th hour in 2002 to penalise us - they can again be changed at the 11th hour to assist us.

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:


Absolutely agree :evil: :evil:

21 wins from 88 games means we should be eligable for 8 of the first ten picks in this years draft. Changing the rules after other clubs milked it for so long and not letting a crippled club get back on its feet is...........

F@%&#! DISGRACEFUL :evil: :evil:


This is what the board should be doing, not piss farting around with the coach.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 54 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group