Crippa wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
So whilst Tom Hawkins is having a day out we take the bloke who before he was injured was the leading intercept mark in the game and play him on the wing.
Meanwhile White runs around like a headless chook. Graham goes back to 2's has a BOG and three other midfielders and one winger are in the 2's with him.
Then when smacked coach says we lacked midfielders.
What ever he did or tried to do didn't work and just like every other coach that stuffs up looks for an excuse.
I still have my doubts about the Cliche Kid
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
I think we can agree to disagree on this one but the one thing we can all agree on is I wish our midfield had Sydney Blue's never say die tenacity to fight against the odds.
Watch his press conference and come back and revisit it.
We were smacked.
He noted his lack of run in the middle.
He said they lacked ability to slow the Geelong entry.
He had 4 or 5 midfield players he could have selected playing in the NB .But he chose a flanker.
Ok you can say the blokes in the 2's are not part of the plan going forward. But neither is the flanker he selected.
He has basically said to those in 2's there is no future for you here.
He has also sent a message to any midfield player of quality who is considering coming to the club .There is no support for you.
How can I be wrong when the result and the game reflected his own comments.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Haha I gave you a compliment and agreed to disagree. That's different to me saying you are wrong.
Now this is me saying you are wrong - his actions aren't about "the result and the game". He's happy to sacrifice that game for the longer term good. So the result of that game is not the measure of our effort to create midfield depth. Raise you eyes Sydney Blue. You too passionately in the detail to obtain the correct perspective. Your heart is in the right place though.