keogh suggested
Williams $900K over 5 years, its more like
$700 over 5 years = $3.5M (yes its millions, but not unusual for footballers)
$900 front loaded in year 1 (GWS can't match it)
Next 4 years = $650pa
13,000,000 - 650,000 = 12,350,000
Look at the last number...its like we haven't spent a thing and we are still at 95% Total player payment.
Martin is even cheaper...with $1M paid upfront of his 5 years $600K pa.
5 x 600,000 = $3M
$3M- $1M = $2M
$2M over 4 years is $500K pa
12,350,000 - 500,000 = 11,850,000
11,850,000 over 38 players is $311,842 each
Cripps has already been front loaded year after year over the past 3 years.
Gov was front loaded....
to get us to 95%
And that's not including the 10% banked ... so there's possibly another 5% (95%-100%) plus 5% (100%-105%):
$765,000 x 2 = $1,530,000 we have yet to spend for next year.
We have the money, a lot of it, and we have to spend it.
We can afford mistakes like Gov, who may come good, if he hear's the wrath of us supporters ... which he is.
But, we have to keep bringing in talent, but this time round, mature, hardened, experienced, high end talent.
There's no problem speculating in the State Leagues, for moneyball players, but we have to keep bringing in better players than the existing, and so on....and lucky for us, we can afford it.
So, don't worry so much about the $ coz we have them.
There's no way we are using our pick 7, or 27 on Fisher and Parlington, so we have to use them wisely for proven better players.
Aren't we the lucky ones the market sees us as a team on the rise: a Destination club. Regardless of what keogh's percepion is and what, Robbo, wahtely or Tom Brown say about our year and our current situation.
There's good reason why players like Kelly, Merrett, Couch, Viney are used in the same sentence as carlton. Smell the Blue Roses babeeeeee