Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:20 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4748 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97 ... 238  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:40 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
jimmae wrote:
Here is one way I might wind up happy with the current scenario:

Delist: Ellard, Carrazzo, Jones, Tutt, Warnock, Watson, Judd, Wood (r), Johnson (r), Russell (r), Fields (r) (net TPP space: ~$1.1m)

I hope you realise that wood & tutt are contracted for next year and jones for the next two years. In the event that we dumped all 3 of them, we'd still have to include their salaries into next years cap

Given that the average AFL salary is 300k, conservatively that would mean 900k+ in payouts next year based on 100k (wood), 200k (tutt) + 600k (jones X2)

Were you suggesting that Ellard, Carrazzo, Warnock, Watson, Judd, Johnson (r), Russell (r), Fields (r) took up 20+% of our salary cap this year? i.e. 2 mill+?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:45 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
How the hell does our pathetic list have salary cap issues?

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24657
Location: Kaloyasena
Clayman wrote:
How the hell does our pathetic list have salary cap issues?




Does your dog need putting down? :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Clayman wrote:
How the hell does our pathetic list have salary cap issues?


I wonder if some of the player movement is based on tightening this up and players being unhappy the money is what the playing group is used to.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
AGRO wrote:
Clayman wrote:
How the hell does our pathetic list have salary cap issues?




Does your dog need putting down? :wink:


If we lose the number 1 draft pick due to salary cap breaches you can put me down.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21651
Location: North of the border
Doesn't a club have to pay a minimum of 92.5% of cap.
So in reality not many clubs would have a massive cap space
You have a 7.5% band to work in

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Clayman wrote:
How the hell does our pathetic list have salary cap issues?


I wonder if some of the player movement is based on tightening this up and players being unhappy the money is what the playing group is used to.


I wouldn't be surprised and I hope so. Hendo was given a contract at the start of the year. It was probably substantially less than Daisy, Gibbs and Murphy contracts and SOS said take it or leave it.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 8:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Sydney Blue wrote:
Doesn't a club have to pay a minimum of 92.5% of cap.
So in reality not many clubs would have a massive cap space
You have a 7.5% band to work in

The figure is actually 95%, but any shortfall of that number is handed-out equally to the squad.

4thchicken wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Here is one way I might wind up happy with the current scenario:

Delist: Ellard, Carrazzo, Jones, Tutt, Warnock, Watson, Judd, Wood (r), Johnson (r), Russell (r), Fields (r) (net TPP space: ~$1.1m)

I hope you realise that wood & tutt are contracted for next year and jones for the next two years. In the event that we dumped all 3 of them, we'd still have to include their salaries into next years cap

Given that the average AFL salary is 300k, conservatively that would mean 900k+ in payouts next year based on 100k (wood), 200k (tutt) + 600k (jones X2)

Were you suggesting that Ellard, Carrazzo, Warnock, Watson, Judd, Johnson (r), Russell (r), Fields (r) took up 20+% of our salary cap this year? i.e. 2 mill+?

Surely Wood is on a rookie contract still at this point, perhaps with an option to be elevated with a deal in place. I really hope our contracting isn't so bad as to guarantee elevation/rookie nomination as a salary cap measure.

If it's the latter then yes there's a figure to pay, but standard rookie contracts are rolling contracts for three years at a fairly minimal amount. I suspect we modified those conditions for Wood, Byrne and Sheehan, but not to the extent you're implying; they're probably not pencilled in for more than 90-100k on the TPP before rookie discounts are applied.

Also, not a @#$%&! chance we picked up Tutt for much more than vet min (~$120k), and the TPP estimate for Jones is supposedly $250k. The sad fact is this is how some of our contracts look at the moment supposedly:

Judd - 500k
Murphy - 650k
Gibbs - 650k
Thomas - 650k
Warnock - 450k
Henderson - 450k
Kreuzer - 400k
Carrazzo - 400k
Simpson - 350k
Walker - 350k
Yarran - 350k

That's over 50% of the cap between 11, even after you account for the veteran's allowance (which is applicable to Walker, Simpson and Carrazzo).

The above isn't unusual for AFL lists; there's a big wage drop from being best 18 and not, though at the more successful clubs you typically see the guys at the tippy top sparing a $25-50k to sign up others on a fair wage.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 8:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Clayman wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Clayman wrote:
How the hell does our pathetic list have salary cap issues?


I wonder if some of the player movement is based on tightening this up and players being unhappy the money is what the playing group is used to.


I wouldn't be surprised and I hope so. Hendo was given a contract at the start of the year. It was probably substantially less than Daisy, Gibbs and Murphy contracts and SOS said take it or leave it.


That makes sense actually so rather than him being told to find a new club, it was more if you're not happy with the money we're offering go find a new club.

I don't mean to doubt what em was told, but it doesn't make sense given the response from McKay and Barker today.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 8:54 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Didn't we mention in the media from memory how we will level out our TPP based on modern standards?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 9:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
I'm not sure anyone really thinks he was told at the start of the year he would be traded at the end of the year. It doesn't work like that, except on the internet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 9:43 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14750
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
I heard that on day one SOS invited him into his office just so he could tell him to GTFO

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 9:48 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Clayman wrote:
How the hell does our pathetic list have salary cap issues?


Because we have a bunch of overpaid hacks and a football manager that has no idea how to manage our Salary Cap and negotiate contracts

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:00 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9116
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Megaman wrote:
I heard that on day one SOS invited him into his office just so he could tell him to GTFO


Not quite. The story goes that SoS, on his first day as list manager, waited in the car park for Henderson to arrive told him as he was trying to get out of his car. Pushing the door back on him in between each word of GTFO. Bell, Yaz and Menzel all witnessed it.

They call SOS the toecutter and joke that Jack will be known as SOT.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
club29 wrote:
Megaman wrote:
I heard that on day one SOS invited him into his office just so he could tell him to GTFO


Not quite. The story goes that SoS, on his first day as list manager, waited in the car park for Henderson to arrive told him as he was trying to get out of his car. Pushing the door back on him in between each word of GTFO. Bell, Yaz and Menzel all witnessed it.

They call SOS the toecutter and joke that Jack will be known as SOT.


:lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24657
Location: Kaloyasena
ThePsychologist wrote:
Clayman wrote:
How the hell does our pathetic list have salary cap issues?


Because we have a bunch of overpaid hacks and a football manager that has no idea how to manage our Salary Cap and negotiate contracts



Do you need to put down your dog?

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19598
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
CARLTON could head to the national draft with as many as five top-20 selections then attempt to lure Bomber Jake Carlisle through the pre-season draft.

But hard-running onballer Tom Bell’s manager has confirmed to the Herald Sun he might seek a trade back to Brisbane in coming weeks.

Carlton’s expected big off-season overhaul started early when they lost swingman Lachie Henderson in sensational circumstances.

http://www.news.com.au/national/carlton ... 7492159567

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Posts: 1587
Location: The Clinic across the road.
So
Pick 1
Pick 2 Kreuzer compo
Pick 10 Henderson
Pick 13 Yarran Richmond
Pick 14 Menzel Adelaide
Pick 20 2nd round
Pick 38
Pick 39 + Brisbane 3rd pick 2016 Bell

Carlisle PSD

There's a rebuild

_________________
"I'll tell you what I didn't do;
I never injected anyone."
AD 3/3/14


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 11:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
jimmae wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Doesn't a club have to pay a minimum of 92.5% of cap.
So in reality not many clubs would have a massive cap space
You have a 7.5% band to work in

The figure is actually 95%, but any shortfall of that number is handed-out equally to the squad.

4thchicken wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Here is one way I might wind up happy with the current scenario:

Delist: Ellard, Carrazzo, Jones, Tutt, Warnock, Watson, Judd, Wood (r), Johnson (r), Russell (r), Fields (r) (net TPP space: ~$1.1m)

I hope you realise that wood & tutt are contracted for next year and jones for the next two years. In the event that we dumped all 3 of them, we'd still have to include their salaries into next years cap

Given that the average AFL salary is 300k, conservatively that would mean 900k+ in payouts next year based on 100k (wood), 200k (tutt) + 600k (jones X2)

Were you suggesting that Ellard, Carrazzo, Warnock, Watson, Judd, Johnson (r), Russell (r), Fields (r) took up 20+% of our salary cap this year? i.e. 2 mill+?

Surely Wood is on a rookie contract still at this point, perhaps with an option to be elevated with a deal in place. I really hope our contracting isn't so bad as to guarantee elevation/rookie nomination as a salary cap measure.

If it's the latter then yes there's a figure to pay, but standard rookie contracts are rolling contracts for three years at a fairly minimal amount. I suspect we modified those conditions for Wood, Byrne and Sheehan, but not to the extent you're implying; they're probably not pencilled in for more than 90-100k on the TPP before rookie discounts are applied.

Also, not a @#$%&! chance we picked up Tutt for much more than vet min (~$120k), and the TPP estimate for Jones is supposedly $250k. The sad fact is this is how some of our contracts look at the moment supposedly:

Judd - 500k
Murphy - 650k
Gibbs - 650k
Thomas - 650k
Warnock - 450k
Henderson - 450k
Kreuzer - 400k
Carrazzo - 400k
Simpson - 350k
Walker - 350k
Yarran - 350k

That's over 50% of the cap between 11, even after you account for the veteran's allowance (which is applicable to Walker, Simpson and Carrazzo).

The above isn't unusual for AFL lists; there's a big wage drop from being best 18 and not, though at the more successful clubs you typically see the guys at the tippy top sparing a $25-50k to sign up others on a fair wage.


On wood - This is where you either need to do some research or have a half decent memory - wood signed a 2 year contract at the end of last year (proof -> see player profile on club website. IF wood was to be retained on a base rookie contract, then there would have been absolutely no need to sign wood up for 2 years unless we were raising his salary in order to compensate him sufficiently to forgo other opportunities that may have arisen.

Tutt & jones - you are underestimating their salaries. They weren't cut from their club but poached. They were brought in as best 22 players - we outbid the dogs on $$ + terms.

Using your numbers
- judd + warnock + carazzo = 1.250k (post-veterans)
- ellard, watson, johnson, russell, fields = <400k
- payout for wood/tutt/jones contracts = 720k+

Conservatively your savings are off by ≥15% (170k+)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2015
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 11:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Given that clubs and press don't seem to report on the structure of contract it's perfectly possible that it's a one-year contract with a one-year option. If it is, under the CBA, both parties need to agree to exercise the option.

Tutt was out of contract; Jones is supposedly on 250k. We would have to be certifiable to be paying them over 400k total.

Judd isn't a veteran, and the vet 'cap' is a percentage of the TPP (~1.222%); Johnson, Russell and Fields only have half of their base payment counted under the TPP and receive no match payments unless elevated and played.

Yeah the numbers were rough but my point being is provided Carlisle isn't brought in for stupid money there's a lot we can do with Warnock, Carrazzo, Henderson and Judd going off our books.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4748 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97 ... 238  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bookie, ByteDanceSpider, Cazzesman, Google [Bot] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group