Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 7:29 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94 ... 172  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:44 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Agree BV ludicrous to have white in front of Jamison -Jamison is no star and needs to play to his limitations but apart from hendo is our best tall defender -waite isn't disciplined enough to play back and shouldn't really be in the calculations as he doesn't play enough lets build the side around hendo as kpf - agree Watson should be a key defender as well


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 9:07 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Megaman wrote:
Have to find players to put in instead of gartlett and yarran


But where will we find an experienced small forward who is brave and has represented Australia?

Wait.... :cool: :idea:

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:29 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
ThePsychologist wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
I agree about Graham but White and Waite as our key backs? The opposition forwards would be licking their lips. Once again Waite showed this year that he can't defend and as much as Jamison makes errors, he's still significantly better than White IMO.
I think we're better off planning without Waite and any games he plays as a floating forward are a bonus. I still think Jamo and Watson should be given first crack as key defensive options.


IMO White is a much better one on one defender than Jamison. Late in 2012 when Jamo was injured White did some great jobs at FB. Just looked as though the role suited him. His body work and spoiling was top class.

Having a look at him yesterday he looked as though he had bulked up significantly?? If so, is he getting ready to play that role? The other bonus about White is he can also push forward when needed. He is a smart player. Unfortunately he struggles a bit when playing as a third tall or flanker. It's not his go. I liken him to Darren Glass. Same size etc. Imagine Glass on a HBF, he'd struggle as well. Sometimes it's just about a player finding the role the suits. I think FB is his.

2014 with Watson, Henderson, Waite, White, Everitt, Walker in the side it could all be about match ups. The days of them playing the same role week in week out are over. it could be a huge advantage for us.


..i like White as a prospect as well, i think at FB Jamo has a better closing speed/spoil than White, but i prefer White in a one on one contested situation.. ..and he has the bonus of being able to play a role up fwd, i think Jamo is a 1 position [FB] player.. ..and strictly FB, vs being as KPD.. ..a roaming CHB role isn't Jamo's bag either, i think he gets a little lost..

..versatility is good, but so is a settled line-up.. .... ..and not all players are suited to differing roles over a season.. ..i think it's dangerous to run a side on match-ups, a few slight tweaks sure, but players need to feel settled for the most part, not just in their own role but importantly to develop that chemistry between eachother.. ..especially down back..

..and i think we've seen over the journey how much swapping and changing roles and positions has slowed some of our player's development.. .... ..i'm thinking we're on the way to being able to field a good, well structured side hopefully without the weekly chopping and changing to suit opposition teams cos we struggle to field a balanced team of our own.. ..am thinking we're close to being beyond that.. ..although plenty will hinge upon the next crop reaching some of their potential.. ..i think the 'versatility card' is a good 'plan B' option when the game is running away from us, and over the course of a season if injuries hit crucial positions..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 12:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25550
Location: Bondi Beach
ThePsychologist wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
I agree about Graham but White and Waite as our key backs? The opposition forwards would be licking their lips. Once again Waite showed this year that he can't defend and as much as Jamison makes errors, he's still significantly better than White IMO.
I think we're better off planning without Waite and any games he plays as a floating forward are a bonus. I still think Jamo and Watson should be given first crack as key defensive options.


IMO White is a much better one on one defender than Jamison. Late in 2012 when Jamo was injured White did some great jobs at FB. Just looked as though the role suited him. His body work and spoiling was top class.

Having a look at him yesterday he looked as though he had bulked up significantly?? If so, is he getting ready to play that role? The other bonus about White is he can also push forward when needed. He is a smart player. Unfortunately he struggles a bit when playing as a third tall or flanker. It's not his go. I liken him to Darren Glass. Same size etc. Imagine Glass on a HBF, he'd struggle as well. Sometimes it's just about a player finding the role the suits. I think FB is his.

2014 with Watson, Henderson, Waite, White, Everitt, Walker in the side it could all be about match ups. The days of them playing the same role week in week out are over. it could be a huge advantage for us.


Really good post Psych. Got me thinking White again.

I'm a bit of a White fan, but did see him hit some low spots during both 2013 and 2014. Made some bad decisions imo.
I had him ahead of McInnes before he got that neck injury. Having said that McInnes was in the seniors whilst White was in the ressies.

Always thought of him as our back up FB. I think he can play that role too.

Good to see him bulk up a bit if he's going to play KPB. I got the feeling that before White go injured end of this year that MM was a fan.
I hope he hasn't lost any speed because that was one of his strengths.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 1:25 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
ThePsychologist wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
I agree about Graham but White and Waite as our key backs? The opposition forwards would be licking their lips. Once again Waite showed this year that he can't defend and as much as Jamison makes errors, he's still significantly better than White IMO.
I think we're better off planning without Waite and any games he plays as a floating forward are a bonus. I still think Jamo and Watson should be given first crack as key defensive options.


IMO White is a much better one on one defender than Jamison. Late in 2012 when Jamo was injured White did some great jobs at FB. Just looked as though the role suited him. His body work and spoiling was top class.

Having a look at him yesterday he looked as though he had bulked up significantly?? If so, is he getting ready to play that role? The other bonus about White is he can also push forward when needed. He is a smart player. Unfortunately he struggles a bit when playing as a third tall or flanker. It's not his go. I liken him to Darren Glass. Same size etc. Imagine Glass on a HBF, he'd struggle as well. Sometimes it's just about a player finding the role the suits. I think FB is his.

2014 with Watson, Henderson, Waite, White, Everitt, Walker in the side it could all be about match ups. The days of them playing the same role week in week out are over. it could be a huge advantage for us.

White is shorter, slower and actually heavier (I think) than Glass. Glass has pretty good reach for his height as well, which is part of the reason he excels as a defender. Another component is his closing speed.

I've no doubt White can win more 1-on-1 grapples than most, but that's only one aspect of body on body work, which is only one aspect of playing as a tall defender. He is a smart footballer, but you need to paper over your weaknesses as much as you need to play to your strengths at this level and White hasn't been able to do that thus far in his time at the club.

I honestly think extra bulk is going to hurt him unless he manages to find a way to use it to significantly improve his pace off the mark. Bigger arms don't really sell that idea to me personally.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:09 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
Glass, 192cm 94kg
White, 190cm 91kg
Think white can play a key role down back, maybe as
a second/third tall, don't think he can match it against the
likes of cloke, brown, Tippett and Hawkins etc, the boys are
to big for him..
Hoping Watson can stand up, maybe Joel Tippett as a rookie
would be worth a shot..
Speaking of players who are made for one positions, laidler
comes to mind, very good third defender, sad to see him go..
Bring on the draft...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:09 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Near future? :razz:

B: Temay Giles McInnes
HB: Everitt Watson Docherty

Foll: Kruezer Cripps Graham
C: Simpson Gibbs Judd

HF: Thomas Henderson Murphy
F: Menzel Casboult Walker

Int: Tuohy Graham Holman Bell

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:49 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25550
Location: Bondi Beach
ThePsychologist wrote:
Near future? :razz:

B: Temay Giles McInnes
HB: Everitt Watson Docherty

Foll: Kruezer Cripps Graham
C: Simpson Gibbs Judd

HF: Thomas Henderson Murphy
F: Menzel Casboult Walker

Int: Tuohy Graham Holman Bell



Just did a similar exercise to look at where the window is for us when all the oldies and also rans go.

Something to work on, perhaps add a 'hot' trade next year...Hogan???...from the salary space Judds departure creates.

Its not bleak. I'm in love with the selections of Cripps and Giles. Over the moon.
Real footballers with real footy smarts, with speed and good disposal. Thank your mother for the rabbits.

Add a Thorp? Tippett? One annual rookie??? Recruiters can turn this around.
Situation will improve and with MM on board for a flag...anything can happen.
I'm happy with the situation I cant control the rest....I'm aware GWS and GC are coming.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25550
Location: Bondi Beach
blueboy23 wrote:
Glass, 192cm 94kg
White, 190cm 91kg
Giles, 195cm 93kg
Think white can play a key role down back, maybe as
a second/third tall, don't think he can match it against the
likes of cloke, brown, Tippett and Hawkins etc, the boys are
to big for him..
Hoping Watson can stand up, maybe Joel Tippett as a rookie
would be worth a shot..
Speaking of players who are made for one positions, laidler
comes to mind, very good third defender, sad to see him go..
Bring on the draft...


:thanks:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:26 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10625
bondiblue wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Near future? :razz:

B: Temay Giles McInnes
HB: Everitt Watson Docherty

Foll: Kruezer Cripps Graham
C: Simpson Gibbs Judd

HF: Thomas Henderson Murphy
F: Menzel Casboult Walker

Int: Tuohy Graham Holman Bell



Just did a similar exercise to look at where the window is for us when all the oldies and also rans go.

Something to work on, perhaps add a 'hot' trade next year...Hogan???...from the salary space Judds departure creates.

Its not bleak. I'm in love with the selections of Cripps and Giles. Over the moon.
Real footballers with real footy smarts, with speed and good disposal. Thank your mother for the rabbits.

Add a Thorp? Tippett? One annual rookie??? Recruiters can turn this around.
Situation will improve and with MM on board for a flag...anything can happen.
I'm happy with the situation I cant control the rest....I'm aware GWS and GC are coming.


Yep - footballers. Exactly Bondi. This is why I agree with you more often than not. :wink:
Sorry don't intend to put you in the "stupid" basket with me.... :razz:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17235
SurreyBlue wrote:
Yep - footballers. Exactly Bondi. This is why I agree with you more often than not. :wink:
Sorry don't intend to put you in the "stupid" basket with me.... :razz:


You said it! :lol: :lol: Didn't you boys want Joel Tippett? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10625
DocSherrin wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Yep - footballers. Exactly Bondi. This is why I agree with you more often than not. :wink:
Sorry don't intend to put you in the "stupid" basket with me.... :razz:


You said it! :lol: :lol: Didn't you boys want Joel Tippett? :lol:


I still want Joel and we might still get him in the rookie draft. Your point is?????
I wouldn't be surprised if we go after Conlon even....again your point is?????
My god some people have tickets on themselves. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 9:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17235
SurreyBlue wrote:
I still want Joel and we might still get him in the rookie draft. Your point is?????
I wouldn't be surprised if we go after Conlon even....again your point is?????
My god some people have tickets on themselves. :oops:


:clap: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Teamboard Updated

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 6:41 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
bondiblue wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Near future? :razz:

B: Temay Giles McInnes
HB: Everitt Watson Docherty

Foll: Kruezer Cripps Graham
C: Simpson Gibbs Judd

HF: Thomas Henderson Murphy
F: Menzel Casboult Walker

Int: Tuohy Graham Holman Bell



Just did a similar exercise to look at where the window is for us when all the oldies and also rans go.

Something to work on, perhaps add a 'hot' trade next year...Hogan???...from the salary space Judds departure creates.

Its not bleak. I'm in love with the selections of Cripps and Giles. Over the moon.
Real footballers with real footy smarts, with speed and good disposal. Thank your mother for the rabbits.

Add a Thorp? Tippett? One annual rookie??? Recruiters can turn this around.
Situation will improve and with MM on board for a flag...anything can happen.
I'm happy with the situation I cant control the rest....I'm aware GWS and GC are coming.


It's always nice when you add some fresh talent to your list. It's exciting and I am happy with what we have done with what we had.

Tom Cutler & George Hewett went at 32 & 33 which were our picks.

With the Betts pick we could of had Hartung, McStay or Crouch. Which way would of been better?

The real issue for me is we have missed another real chance to significantly improve our list. I thought the List Management of Collingwood, St Kilda & Brisbane was impressive and it started in trade week.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:49 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..not sure.. ..i think those 3 clubs have lost proven talent.. ..kids could be anything, and no promise they won't 'walk' like their predecessors have.. ..maybe pies, cos of their movement up the draft and adams is decent as a kid.. ..but last year they went smalls, and sharens has those funky feet.. ..personally i'd be more worried about his feet than i am about menz's knees.. ..yes those clubs got in more talent, but they lost more too.. ..and some crucial types as well, not so easily replaceable..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:01 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Collingwood have had a fantastic trade/draft period.

Lost Thomas & Shaw who are both past their best and recruited Adams, Scharenberg, Freeman, Marsh, White & Karmezis. IMO very impressive. :hitcomputer:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:12 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
SurreyBlue wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Yep - footballers. Exactly Bondi. This is why I agree with you more often than not. :wink:
Sorry don't intend to put you in the "stupid" basket with me.... :razz:


You said it! :lol: :lol: Didn't you boys want Joel Tippett? :lol:


I still want Joel and we might still get him in the rookie draft. Your point is?????
I wouldn't be surprised if we go after Conlon even....again your point is?????
My god some people have tickets on themselves. :oops:


But you still won't admit how much of Tippett you've actually seen play, right?

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:23 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
ThePsychologist wrote:
Collingwood have had a fantastic trade/draft period.

Lost Thomas & Shaw who are both past their best and recruited Adams, Scharenberg, Freeman, Marsh, White & Karmezis. IMO very impressive. :hitcomputer:


..Marsh, he may come good sure, but at pick 70+ even if he somehow slipped down an entire round, he's still very much a late pick with a lot of work to do to come good.. .... ..White [jesse] is a workhorse tall that had a good season in a top team but will struggle some at the pies and be back to his usual standard.. ..i don't see white as having 'turned the corner', i see him more like say 'a jamar', a big player that has a purple patch, but it's illusory.. .... ..Karnezis?, who knows but i reckon he will struggle with the leading teams buckley style of coaching..

..adams is good, if small [they have a few small mids now].. ..also so stories go, a bit of a knob.. ....but i like him as a player just the same, is only i think they have too many now of his 'type'.. ..sharenburgers should be good, but his kind of feet injuries give me the nervous-nellies..

..Daisy and Shaw ought not to be past their prime, although obviously much less 'prime' left for them.. .... ..but they are two very, very good players out of the team.. ..personally i think they did a little bit better than breaking even.. ..i wouldn't be pumping up their tyres just yet.. ..too much hyping what went in and belittling what went out for my liking..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our best 22?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:25 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4589
Location: Blisstonia.
Psych Collingwood lost Paine as well. You used him as an example when you want to talk up Brisbane's fwd prospects, but leave him out from Collingwood's losses.

IMO, Thomas and Shaw are greater losses than Hampson and Betts. Obviously.

I've asked numerous times who are the Carlton equivalents of Thomas and Shaw that we'd be happy to get rid of to get another early picks and I never get an answer. Would have to be Walker, Gibbs, Kreuzer....

They picked up 3 top 15 players. Adams, Schranberg, Freeman.
We picked up 2 Cripps, Docherty and Thomas who at 26 (ankle permitting) is hardly finished.

Everitt vs White is close. Everitt cost nothing, White a 2nd and 3rd rounder.

Marsh was Pick 77, because he's seen as athlete before footballer vs Sheehan, Byrne, Ellis and Holman. Could all be busts, but time will tell.

Karnezis and Armstrong are list cloggers. Karnezis might make it, but on what we've seen so far he'd be exactly the kind of guy that TC dislikes.

Tall, athletic, poor decision maker, poor execution and talk of lack of dedication.

Not arguing who did better, just outlining that on paper it might be closer than people think.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94 ... 172  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group