Braithy wrote:
walsh is heavy into yoga and pilates. the theory there is, you build up muscle mass around the ailing vertebrae to take the load off them.
i think the criticism on chiro is you can do more damage to discs by cracking/ manipulating/ adjusting the spine. so there's risks.
great to know Walshie is into the yoga/movement routines for his back. i’d expect most contemporary players to be aware of it but AFL footy is still a tough guy domain to some extent.
it always amazes me how effective movement practices can be in overcoming the worst of painful immobility issues. (conversely, heaps of people seem to injure their back doing more complicated asanas like headstands etc!)
in order for Chiros to be allowed in the medical insurance scheme in Australia, the largest Australian epidemiological study of various back treatment regimes was conducted.
all sorts of treatment regimes eg, GP giving massage and needles, Chiro care, physiotherapy, surgery to you name it with myotherapy & allied health stuff had the results and costs compared statistically.
the study concluded Chiro is hands down most effective at a) relieving pain b) reducing number of days off work c) increasing mobility. it’s not even a contest d) cost. i would never recommend a Physiotherapist for back/neurological issues today for eg. waste of money, IMHO. you have to go twice before they even give you their better version of their exercises for you to do at home.
the damage discs stuff is conjecture from established medical profession bc they don’t understand it and the "subluxation" claim is not scientifically credible (according to what ive read in the past) and probably based on old stories of the "backyard back butcher" chiros of yesteryear. Gonstead is the school of chiro of choice in my limited experience, based on the work of a US Chiro who became legendary in the 50s etc. and his two junior colleagues who tried to formalise what they learned from Gonstead.
was looking for data and came across this comment on a IJPC (a journal):
> The founder of modern medicine, Hippocrates, listed rachiotherapy (Greek word for back or spinal care) as a fundamental element of medicine alongside surgery and medicinal therapy. In Hippocrates’ treatise on joints, he speaks of parathremata, which is a concept corresponding to what chiropractic describes as the subluxation, where the vertebrae in the spine are minimally displaced, only to a very small extent. Hippocrates goes on to say that it is necessary to have a good knowledge of the spine because many disorders are associated with the spine and displacement of vertebrae, including pharyngitis, laryngitis, bronchial asthma, tuberculosis, nephritis, cystitis, inadequate gonadal development, constipation, enuresis, and many other diseases that the medical profession and some in the chiropractic profession strangely insist cannot be helped following chiropractic care and improvement to neurological function.
https://www.ijpconline.orgSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk