bondiblue wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
Generous to JSOS, harsh on Kemp, the rest I agree with.
Without taking experience into consideration, all the metrics show Jack and Plow had more impact on the game than Kemp.
Do the same metrics measure negative impacts?
I thought for two experienced players their mistakes were particularly costly
The 3 of them made costly mistakes...and some of Kemp's were particularly costly.
I considered all positive and negative output PLUS the eye test....I was being nice towards Kemp with subtle comment.
Do you really think Jack played worse than Kemp? I don't. Ditto Plow.
That doesn't mean I thought Plow and Jack played well.
Hence I look forward to the return of Sam Durdin, and Gov to replace Kemp and Plow, and the return of Pitto to put an end to this exhaustive caper Jack is undertaking rucking that is above his weight and height Division
It depends if you consider Kemp’s mistakes to be getting caught behind Ryder on the lead. I thought Ryder was just about BOG and his nous showed.
I think Jack’s miss from the top of the square, where he called for the ball from a guy in better position, was just about the biggest clanger of the night.
Plowman for me is out of chances. He’s been a solid enough servant over the lean times but it’s absolutely time to move him on. I think Kemp has more upside and if played as a third tall with Weitering to give him direction will improve, I’ve seen enough of Plow to think he’s at his peak.
In saying that, everyone has their scapegoats and Plow happens to be mine, a bit like LoB seems to polarise opinions