Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 11, 2025 8:57 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 334 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19393
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Blue Vain wrote:
Our defensive run is good. It's our offensive run that's poor. Our players are too defensively minded when we win possession.
Look around the field when we win the ball in defence. It's one on one football. Our players are reluctant to take a risk and present a running option, they don't block for each other to create a loose man. They don't create multiple running options to create space.
That's mindset. That's players unsure of whats required and players not wanting to make a mistake. That's what pre-seasons and training sessions are for.
The result is we kick down the line and turn 100% possession into a 50/50 contest at best.

I've been saying it for years. Good teams put their time into retaining possession. We win it well enough. We just have the structures and knowledge to maintain it.


:clap:

Same with the kickouts...players jogging and not sprinting to get free. Occasionally Curnow will put in a massive sprint to get free...other than that not much. Bomb to Wood. Bomb to Rowe.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:12 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
cimm1979 wrote:
If the rest of the team had worked as hard as Henderson did last night we would have won.


He's an absolute class act who shows a bit of flowering leadership out there. He came good late last year after an interrupted pre season.

He's a gun who's at least kicked more than 5 goals in a game of AFL footy. Put Cas back in the fwd line plus a third tall like Walker/Everitt and the dynamics of that fwd line will change significantly for the better. Bucks for the crumbing too, just amazed he's out of favour at the minute. The lad can play and he plays with a bit of bottle too, get him back!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:15 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Blue Vain wrote:

Our defensive run is good. It's our offensive run that's poor. Our players are too defensively minded when we win possession.
Look around the field when we win the ball in defence. It's one on one football. Our players are reluctant to take a risk and present a running option, they don't block for each other to create a loose man. They don't create multiple running options to create space.
That's mindset. That's players unsure of whats required and players not wanting to make a mistake. That's what pre-seasons and training sessions are for. That's what line coaches are for.
The result is we kick down the line and turn 100% possession into a 50/50 contest at best.

I've been saying it for years. Good teams put their time into retaining possession. We win it well enough. We just have the structures and knowledge to maintain it.



..disagree, I think our defensive running is poor.. ..offensive running needs work too, hence me saying not enough two way running.. ..not enough running full stop.. ....how many times did an onballer or hf run back hard enough to put their body on the line by filling the hole in opposition f50..?.. ..when we tried to switchlay, where were the loose players..?.. ..this is work rate.. ..its not about game plan, it's about work rate.. ..every game plan will call for players to run into open space..

..we lose possession because selfish players call for the ball instead of blocking and shepherding.. (Murphy must spend half the match waving his hands for the cheapy)

..up and under kicks, slow loopy handballs, passing to a player under pressure/outnumbered..

....these mistakes have been happening for a decade..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:16 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Blues Clues wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
If the rest of the team had worked as hard as Henderson did last night we would have won.


He's an absolute class act who shows a bit of flowering leadership out there. He came good late last year after an interrupted pre season.

He's a gun who's at least kicked more than 5 goals in a game of AFL footy. Put Cas back in the fwd line plus a third tall like Walker/Everitt and the dynamics of that fwd line will change significantly for the better. Bucks for the crumbing too, just amazed he's out of favour at the minute. The lad can play and he plays with a bit of bottle too, get him back!!



Numpties see him drop one mark and miss one goal in the second half and think that's all there is to the game.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:18 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 62
Location: McKinnon, Victoria
IMHO not much has changed from last season and the season before. Game starts ok, we win the ball from the middle, there appears to be a system in place and we deliver into the forward fifty. Forwards take marks and miss really easy goals from set shots. All the hard work is wasted. If the 3 goal 7 was 7 goals 3 at quarter time, the scoreboard pressure on the Tigers would have been telling. This scenario has played out a lot in our losses over the past few years.

Then, our opposition begins to apply the teensiest, tinyest amount of pressure and the system breaks down. Players become rushed, disposal efficiency drops and so does confidence. The opposition seize the opportunity, their confidence rises and away they go. Plan A is failing but no changes are made, no player puts their hand up to take the game on and inspire their team mates and so it goes until the final siren and I'm sitting next to the Richmond cheer squad belting out "Yellow and Black"!

Lots of criticism of individual players on this thread, but this pattern occurs time and again season after season. It's a cultural deficiency... Might require a generational change unfortunately.

Good news is that I can book my September holidays without any regret.

TwinOne


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:20 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Donstuie wrote:
Heavs wrote:
Was the hovercraft cool though? On the radio they seemed to think the 'match day experience' (well, apart from the game) was very excellent and the bar was set for all other clubs.
I'll give the club credit. It was a marked improvement on what I saw last year (although the hovercraft to me is a bit :screwy: ). It seemed closer to a "Carlton experience" than what felt like the "tick here for the basic pre-game package" from previous years.


yes. I appreciate the effort.
particularly liked the picket fence.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:23 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25008
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
really, we won enough ball and clearances to win the game last night.

casboult adding forward structure in the form of leading from the goal square and forcing rance to go to him would have opened up our whole forward 50.

we still need a zippy, creative type like buckley up there who can beat a man, open some space or apply some pressure to put the brakes on the rebound once the ball hits the deck.


We won clearances but where did we go with the break advantage?

Rarely did we go past HFF let alone where Hendo and Jones and at times Everitt Jaksche Roew and Wood were camped.

Clearances were good but after that part of the ball movement procession it was fools gold...no outside run.....other than from the HB...Imo.

I don't think people saw on a TV that the ball hardly went near our forward line, and when it did it just went over the 50m arc and they just took it and set up the rebound where our guys couldn't keep up...then they pressed us (against the ropes) in their cowardliness and pummelled us.

We definitely needed an in form Buckley taking on the press in the back half...you're dead right we lacked zip

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:31 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2662
Menzel put in a couple of soft efforts last night .... very unlike him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:31 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25008
Location: Bondi Beach
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Humpers wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

Boekhurst...can't believe we pick a mature player with a first rounder and he's in the reserves


Yep - this club is never going to progress until recruitment blunders like this are stopped.
I can accept that sometimes certain U/18 players don't turn out like we would hope - however recruiting decisions like the Boekhorst selection (ahead of the likes of Laverde/Goddard), McLean, Warnock etc are slowly eroding my love for this one great club.


..will say it again, BB is not a mature player for football.. ..yea he is 21, but he's not seasoned nor experienced.. ..he is a late convert to the sport, and the previous sport has no real correlation to footy in regards to fitness or skills either.. ..he will need a couple of preseasons.. ..cant understand why ppl think otherwise.. ..give him time..


Fair enough BKB.

I guess he will come on when Judd Simpson Carrazzo Curnow have gone, Murphy in his twig height with a lost yard and he is leading our 20 you....the cycle of life and death?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:35 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:23 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Melbourne
Senior players getting old.
Mid level players not good enough.
Playing a bunch of young kids/first years.

This is the formula for being a wooden spoon contender.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
cimm1979 wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
If the rest of the team had worked as hard as Henderson did last night we would have won.


He's an absolute class act who shows a bit of flowering leadership out there. He came good late last year after an interrupted pre season.

He's a gun who's at least kicked more than 5 goals in a game of AFL footy. Put Cas back in the fwd line plus a third tall like Walker/Everitt and the dynamics of that fwd line will change significantly for the better. Bucks for the crumbing too, just amazed he's out of favour at the minute. The lad can play and he plays with a bit of bottle too, get him back!!



Numpties see him drop one mark and miss one goal in the second half and think that's all there is to the game.

No mate he's just at the other end of the ego/heart spectrum all our players seem to be on: he's all heart, no ego.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Explain this.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
I can't remember the last time he won a game for us up forward by doing anything other than meat and potatoes lead up work. Doesn't have true attacking instincts to snag a goal.

You don't want show ponies, but you don't want blokes who fail to abandon team instruction when a better marking or goal opportunity presents itself. Teams that look tactically stale are often harbouring too many blokes who can't think outside the box and provide a new option for the coach.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
jimmae wrote:
I can't remember the last time he won a game for us up forward by doing anything other than meat and potatoes lead up work. Doesn't have true attacking instincts to snag a goal.

You don't want show ponies, but you don't want blokes who fail to abandon team instruction when a better marking or goal opportunity presents itself. Teams that look tactically stale are often harbouring too many blokes who can't think outside the box and provide a new option for the coach.


So your criticism is he's a hard working, quality KPP who follows the game plan to the letter but struggles to win games off his own boot by defying the coach?

Fev was in the crowd, how did he work out?

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:42 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
It seems that there is a palpable sense of great disappointment across the thread. The posts from observers that I value have certainly shown that. Have yet to watch the game. It appears not much has changed. I thought MM's statements after the game were very poor. After a full pre-season and to put up a performance like that was sad. Our club is like the British Empire - once great but now irrelevant in the big picture.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
jimmae wrote:
I can't remember the last time he won a game for us up forward by doing anything other than meat and potatoes lead up work. Doesn't have true attacking instincts to snag a goal.

You don't want show ponies, but you don't want blokes who fail to abandon team instruction when a better marking or goal opportunity presents itself. Teams that look tactically stale are often harbouring too many blokes who can't think outside the box and provide a new option for the coach.



..in my view I partly agree with the end result of what jimmae is saying but for different reasons.. ..in my opinion he is an old fashioned chf that will create that will create for the finisher, but not the finisher himself.. ..he will still kick goals, but he will be the prime avenue into the f50 if we play him as such.. ..he will cover the miles, runs the patterns.. ..i'd like to run watto with him in a similar manner, and be kicking into faster more mobile leading targets inside fifty that can also apply defensive pressure and crumb goals off each other..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:47 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7354
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:

Our defensive run is good. It's our offensive run that's poor. Our players are too defensively minded when we win possession.
Look around the field when we win the ball in defence. It's one on one football. Our players are reluctant to take a risk and present a running option, they don't block for each other to create a loose man. They don't create multiple running options to create space.
That's mindset. That's players unsure of whats required and players not wanting to make a mistake. That's what pre-seasons and training sessions are for. That's what line coaches are for.
The result is we kick down the line and turn 100% possession into a 50/50 contest at best.

I've been saying it for years. Good teams put their time into retaining possession. We win it well enough. We just have the structures and knowledge to maintain it.



..disagree, I think our defensive running is poor.. ..offensive running needs work too, hence me saying not enough two way running.. ..not enough running full stop.. ....how many times did an onballer or hf run back hard enough to put their body on the line by filling the hole in opposition f50..?.. ..when we tried to switchlay, where were the loose players..?.. ..this is work rate.. ..its not about game plan, it's about work rate.. ..every game plan will call for players to run into open space..

..we lose possession because selfish players call for the ball instead of blocking and shepherding.. (Murphy must spend half the match waving his hands for the cheapy)

..up and under kicks, slow loopy handballs, passing to a player under pressure/outnumbered..

....these mistakes have been happening for a decade..

Our defensive running was very poor after qtr time, as I lost count of the running bounces they had from the backline without being pressured.

As was our offensive running when the tigers adjusted their zoning and we were static for large parts, forcing a long kick to a contest.

For me nothing has changed in regards to the attitude of our mids, even after two coaches... look like superstars when things are going well, lazy ball watchers when under pressure.

Our forward structure had issues but where was the help from the mids? 3 goals... two of them in the last when the game was done.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
The score board flashed up with 27 running bounces to Richmond early in the second half. Ridiculous statistic.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
cimm1979 wrote:
jimmae wrote:
I can't remember the last time he won a game for us up forward by doing anything other than meat and potatoes lead up work. Doesn't have true attacking instincts to snag a goal.

You don't want show ponies, but you don't want blokes who fail to abandon team instruction when a better marking or goal opportunity presents itself. Teams that look tactically stale are often harbouring too many blokes who can't think outside the box and provide a new option for the coach.


So your criticism is he's a hard working, quality KPP who follows the game plan to the letter but struggles to win games off his own boot by defying the coach?

Fev was in the crowd, how did he work out?

The instruction is to provide reliability, to seek out the obvious and high-percentage opportunities within the system. Being able to step outside that when the opposition inevitably pressure the regular avenues is what separates the the top tiers of players from the rest.

You largely want players who play by the rules, but know when to break the rules. Otherwise you've got 21 robots with imperfect skills, which entirely defeats the point of having robots in the first place.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
You need the spread both ways.. But that means you need runners..
You're not going to move the ball through a well organized , structured, defensive set up by foot with no movements

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 334 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bluebo baggers, ByteDanceSpider and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group