Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 5:22 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 204 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 4:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17474
Location: Left Cuckistan
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
If you think betts is better than thomas. Thats your perogative. I dont. If its a mistake. It cost us 200k
but dont forget to mention everett or docherty tonight or reincarnation of rowe
and just to jog your memory who gave up pick 11 for 60 games in 5 seasons mclean, or let jacobs go?



All clubs make bad trades, does the recruitment of Cameron Wood to Collingwood for pick 15 or Chris Bryan on a 2 year deal ring any bells?


Pfft. That was the recruiters fault. Mick was only involved in the Luke Ball theft. And any other good things that happened.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 4:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Malthouse was instrumental in getting Buckley over to Collingwood from the Bears, don't forget.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 4:44 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
verbs wrote:
Malthouse was instrumental in getting Buckley over to Collingwood from the Bears, don't forget.

Think you'll find Buckley was at Collingwood about 5 or 6 years before Mick arrived.

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
If you think betts is better than thomas. Thats your perogative. I dont. If its a mistake. It cost us 200k
but dont forget to mention everett or docherty tonight or reincarnation of rowe
and just to jog your memory who gave up pick 11 for 60 games in 5 seasons mclean, or let jacobs go?


Oh FFS, do you really believe this stuff?
Malthouse wouldn't have known Docherty if he stood up in his coco pops.
It's the role of one of the recruiting staff to look at fringe players at other AFL clubs. The same as someone looks at the VFL, TAC, SANFL etc etc. (You know, the recruiting staff you continuously bag based on zero knowledge of their roles or responsibilities)
They make the recommendations.

But no, according to you, everything good = Mick, everything bad = Ratten/recruiting staff.
I swear some of you go to bed with a photo of Mick and have a good old Uncle Doug until your hand slips off the end and knocks you senseless.

At least give credit where it's due.

All clubs make bad trades, does the recruitment of Cameron Wood to Collingwood for pick 15 or Chris Bryan on a 2 year deal ring any bells?


Don't turn this around. The whole point of my post was that the like of you make out that everything Mick does is bad & ignore the positives


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18009
Michael Jezz wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
If you think betts is better than thomas. Thats your perogative. I dont. If its a mistake. It cost us 200k
but dont forget to mention everett or docherty tonight or reincarnation of rowe
and just to jog your memory who gave up pick 11 for 60 games in 5 seasons mclean, or let jacobs go?


Oh FFS, do you really believe this stuff?
Malthouse wouldn't have known Docherty if he stood up in his coco pops.
It's the role of one of the recruiting staff to look at fringe players at other AFL clubs. The same as someone looks at the VFL, TAC, SANFL etc etc. (You know, the recruiting staff you continuously bag based on zero knowledge of their roles or responsibilities)
They make the recommendations.

But no, according to you, everything good = Mick, everything bad = Ratten/recruiting staff.
I swear some of you go to bed with a photo of Mick and have a good old Uncle Doug until your hand slips off the end and knocks you senseless.

At least give credit where it's due.

All clubs make bad trades, does the recruitment of Cameron Wood to Collingwood for pick 15 or Chris Bryan on a 2 year deal ring any bells?


Don't turn this around. The whole point of my post was that the like of you make out that everything Mick does is bad & ignore the positives



:lol:
No. The whole point is, once again you're full of crap.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14593
Location: Sydney
murraycray wrote:
verbs wrote:
Malthouse was instrumental in getting Buckley over to Collingwood from the Bears, don't forget.

Think you'll find Buckley was at Collingwood about 5 or 6 years before Mick arrived.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 6:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
If you think betts is better than thomas. Thats your perogative. I dont. If its a mistake. It cost us 200k
but dont forget to mention everett or docherty tonight or reincarnation of rowe
and just to jog your memory who gave up pick 11 for 60 games in 5 seasons mclean, or let jacobs go?


Oh FFS, do you really believe this stuff?
Malthouse wouldn't have known Docherty if he stood up in his coco pops.
It's the role of one of the recruiting staff to look at fringe players at other AFL clubs. The same as someone looks at the VFL, TAC, SANFL etc etc. (You know, the recruiting staff you continuously bag based on zero knowledge of their roles or responsibilities)
They make the recommendations.

But no, according to you, everything good = Mick, everything bad = Ratten/recruiting staff.
I swear some of you go to bed with a photo of Mick and have a good old Uncle Doug until your hand slips off the end and knocks you senseless.

At least give credit where it's due.

All clubs make bad trades, does the recruitment of Cameron Wood to Collingwood for pick 15 or Chris Bryan on a 2 year deal ring any bells?


Don't turn this around. The whole point of my post was that the like of you make out that everything Mick does is bad & ignore the positives



:lol:
No. The whole point is, once again you're full of crap.


And in the end when you have nothing left- the last bullet in the gun is a personal attack. Lay it on pal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:10 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
GreatEx wrote:
murraycray wrote:
verbs wrote:
Malthouse was instrumental in getting Buckley over to Collingwood from the Bears, don't forget.

Think you'll find Buckley was at Collingwood about 5 or 6 years before Mick arrived.


Image

Aaah, being verbs shoulda known, silly me......OK play on !! :grin:

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18622
Location: threeohfivethree
GreatEx wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..asking a vet to 'fix' our players..?.. ..that's a bit rough ain't it..?..


Not to mention redundant.


:lol:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 11:10 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1354
Blue Sombrero wrote:
dadadadada wrote:
They run the ball out of defence, whereas we kick the ball out 1985 style.

They have a good future Collingwood due to their recruiting.

We needed goal poachers at the end ... the best one we had we sold off to Adelaide so MM could bring his favourite boy in.

Our players had flair, but Malthouse has ripped it apart.


Do you actually understand the concept of free agency?


Yes, I do.

Why do you ask ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:41 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18009
Michael Jezz wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
If you think betts is better than thomas. Thats your perogative. I dont. If its a mistake. It cost us 200k
but dont forget to mention everett or docherty tonight or reincarnation of rowe
and just to jog your memory who gave up pick 11 for 60 games in 5 seasons mclean, or let jacobs go?


Oh FFS, do you really believe this stuff?
Malthouse wouldn't have known Docherty if he stood up in his coco pops.
It's the role of one of the recruiting staff to look at fringe players at other AFL clubs. The same as someone looks at the VFL, TAC, SANFL etc etc. (You know, the recruiting staff you continuously bag based on zero knowledge of their roles or responsibilities)
They make the recommendations.

But no, according to you, everything good = Mick, everything bad = Ratten/recruiting staff.
I swear some of you go to bed with a photo of Mick and have a good old Uncle Doug until your hand slips off the end and knocks you senseless.

At least give credit where it's due.

All clubs make bad trades, does the recruitment of Cameron Wood to Collingwood for pick 15 or Chris Bryan on a 2 year deal ring any bells?


Don't turn this around. The whole point of my post was that the like of you make out that everything Mick does is bad & ignore the positives



:lol:
No. The whole point is, once again you're full of crap.


And in the end when you have nothing left- the last bullet in the gun is a personal attack. Lay it on pal


You seem confused.
A personal attack is when I criticise your freckles or the size of your penis.
What I have done here is highlight that many of your posts are full of inaccuracies and fabrications. It's merely a case of setting the record straight.
It's not ideal for people to read your posts and think what you're written is true. It sends us off on tangents which serve no purpose. :thumbsup:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:17 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
Jezz has freckles on his penis ...????? :eek:

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:19 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Those two seem to know each other well.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 11:18 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
kennyhunter wrote:
Jezz has freckles on his penis ...????? :eek:


it was criticism of "freckles" OR "the penal length"

I agree with dane on this one. I have checked the medical and scientific literature data base this morning and so far there doesnt seem to be a direct correlation or causal link between these two physiological parameters in humans.

I will keep searching until mid October.

[FRYBIE]

...in the meantime?

Smartphone app The Predicktor predicts penis size

Canadian doctor Chris Culligan said the system, which uses criteria such as height, finger length and sexual orientation, aims to assuage male insecurity about penis size.

There’s an app for that?

A new smartphone program created by a Canadian doctor purports to accurately predict the size of a man’s penis, using a set of seemingly inane criteria, including height and finger length.

The Predicktor, created by Toronto physician Dr. Chris Culligan, functions as a “calculator that attempts to predict his penis size by cross referencing trends from scientific studies with his personal stats like height and finger length,” the app’s website reads.


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1260356

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 11:53 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
If you think betts is better than thomas. Thats your perogative. I dont. If its a mistake. It cost us 200k
but dont forget to mention everett or docherty tonight or reincarnation of rowe
and just to jog your memory who gave up pick 11 for 60 games in 5 seasons mclean, or let jacobs go?


Oh FFS, do you really believe this stuff?
Malthouse wouldn't have known Docherty if he stood up in his coco pops.
It's the role of one of the recruiting staff to look at fringe players at other AFL clubs. The same as someone looks at the VFL, TAC, SANFL etc etc. (You know, the recruiting staff you continuously bag based on zero knowledge of their roles or responsibilities)
They make the recommendations.

But no, according to you, everything good = Mick, everything bad = Ratten/recruiting staff.
I swear some of you go to bed with a photo of Mick and have a good old Uncle Doug until your hand slips off the end and knocks you senseless.

At least give credit where it's due.

All clubs make bad trades, does the recruitment of Cameron Wood to Collingwood for pick 15 or Chris Bryan on a 2 year deal ring any bells?

Didnt mick fly to brisbane to talk with doc? Presumably to convince him to come to carlton


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:16 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
padre wrote:
Didnt mick fly to brisbane to talk with doc? Presumably to convince him to come to carlton


If he turns out to be a shit player yes, if he is good player then it's no.
Are we clear on that?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:17 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
padre wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
If you think betts is better than thomas. Thats your perogative. I dont. If its a mistake. It cost us 200k
but dont forget to mention everett or docherty tonight or reincarnation of rowe
and just to jog your memory who gave up pick 11 for 60 games in 5 seasons mclean, or let jacobs go?


Oh FFS, do you really believe this stuff?
Malthouse wouldn't have known Docherty if he stood up in his coco pops.
It's the role of one of the recruiting staff to look at fringe players at other AFL clubs. The same as someone looks at the VFL, TAC, SANFL etc etc. (You know, the recruiting staff you continuously bag based on zero knowledge of their roles or responsibilities)
They make the recommendations.

But no, according to you, everything good = Mick, everything bad = Ratten/recruiting staff.
I swear some of you go to bed with a photo of Mick and have a good old Uncle Doug until your hand slips off the end and knocks you senseless.

At least give credit where it's due.

All clubs make bad trades, does the recruitment of Cameron Wood to Collingwood for pick 15 or Chris Bryan on a 2 year deal ring any bells?

Didnt mick fly to brisbane to talk with doc? Presumably to convince him to come to carlton



No that was Everitt.

Doc had moved to Melbourne the second Brisbane finished their season last year such was his determination to come home.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:24 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
dadadadada wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
dadadadada wrote:
They run the ball out of defence, whereas we kick the ball out 1985 style.

They have a good future Collingwood due to their recruiting.

We needed goal poachers at the end ... the best one we had we sold off to Adelaide so MM could bring his favourite boy in.

Our players had flair, but Malthouse has ripped it apart.


Do you actually understand the concept of free agency?


Yes, I do.

Why do you ask ?

Because we didn't sell him off. They offered him a trip to be with his dad and more money. He was gone at the end of 2012 in all but contract.
If his dad hadn't been sick we might have kept him. But FA means you want to go, you go. The club has no real say.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 4:39 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:52 am
Posts: 1197
[youtube]HPcAWhhegWc[/youtube]

[youtube]5WSyBk74pLg[/youtube]

[youtube]N-pyUVWLDPM[/youtube]

[youtube]i5BdLbTtie8[/youtube]

[youtube]JOBNOiA1vWY[/youtube]

[youtube]pKmtoaLbPr4[/youtube]

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Navyblue95 -
my youtube channel tracking carlton news on television and paytv


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 12:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Punter22 wrote:
Well, I think the club has an opportunity to use some of the rule changes to its advantage this off season if they are bold and use their brains (which clearly on both counts would be a 180 from the last decade and require someone other than McKay to be involved).

In addition to all the obvious delistings, let's say they let Waite go in FA, trade Garlett to WCE for a second rounder and trade Kreuzer for hopefully a first, but more likely a second and a favouarble swap of later picks.

Instead of being typical, stupid and short sighted Carlton, they don't go and splurge that freed up $ and bank it for either a FA next year or chisel out one of the kids from GWS.

there should be a LOT of $ coming off the books this year. Unless McKay decides Judd is worth another $1m, Waite is worth another 2 year deal etc. All of which is far more likely than anything sensible happening.

Gartlett isn't getting us a second round draft pick or even a third.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 204 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], klaatu, ScottSaunders2 and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group