Michael Jezz wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..I was more making the point that the dee's have some kids that look very good, we have one, maybe two.. ..yes we have some serviceable types, some that may forge decent careers.... ..those dee's kids look like the sort you build a team around.. ....hell we can raise the age up to 24, looking ahead we still don't have much coming through.. ..Tyson and viney will be the nucleus of their midfield, salem will run through there.. ..yes viney is a father son, and good luck to them since they have a poor record for father sons in our time.. ..but looking at their list, if you were a coach that wanted to set down a foundation and create a culture, roos could do a lot worse than the Melbourne kids..
The point is that Roos foundation is better than Malthouse and apart from Menzel Malthouse has started to build the list on the back of some very canny trading & not a lot of great picks
Hampson for Pick 32 ontraded for Pick 39 (Giles) & Everett
Betts for Thomas
Docherty for pick 33.
Foundation yes but in terms of personnel for
this year it's debatable.
Turned the Dees into a defensive machine yet since Carlton's coaching change the club is leaking points. This with Roos having to play Lynden Dunn at full back, having to move Frawley forward because of Clark retiring; Dawes injured, Garland injured for a chunk.
Proved Gerry's point highlighting the rubbish drafting they had for a while.