Effes wrote:
verbs wrote:
Effes wrote:
Look at St Kilda's list and who has played for them this year. Lots of kids and no names. Newnes, Wright, Templeton, Webster, Saunders, Curren...nothing special. Loads of inexperience
Everyone would have said before the season started that our list was much better than St Kilda's.
Forget about results for the moment (no doubt they will experience some thumpings as young sides do) - one thing you notice from St Kilda early in the season is that they are playing for the coach.
You cannot say the same about Carlton - there is no enthusiasm.
Now people can say its a lack of leadership amongst the Carlton group but you rarely saw such a lack of enthusiasm under Ratten.
You can see it in the looks on their faces when they have possession.
There is so much confusion.
Confusion, and no confidence.
No confidence because the plan they are being asked to execute is ineffective and easily countered, and the players know it. The opposition knows it. We all know it. Surely Malthouse knows it, but perhaps he doesn't have any alternative.
One part we probably don't look at enough is what defensive structures are in place.
Last year, Carlton were ranked 15th for uncontested possession differential. After round three this year we are ranked 18th (last)
There appears to be little plan to defend - no setup to stop the opposition moving the ball forward via uncontested possessions; whether that be from kickouts or after the opposition have inevitably gathered the ball in our forward line.
These defensive setups have little to do with talent and everything to do with coaching. After more than a year at the club, there is still no sign of any plan to counter/slow down opposition ball movement.
Our players are not taught on planning and execution.
Every time the ball was in dispute at a ruck contest they tapped the ball back 3,4 meters and had 2/3 unopposed team mates waiting, then they gained possession and they were off and running. Our players gained possession and blindly kicked forward to their unmarked players or handballed forward blindly to their unmarked players.
We fell forward at the half forward line because we kicked to our out numbered forwards (who were been raped) and as they again had the ascendancy to run and stop a team mate and make good decisions and by pass our loose men.
We are not disciplined on the team ethic.
I’m pretty sure I saw only a hand full of shepherds and the two I remember vividly were from 2 of our skinniest blokes (Simpson and Buckley).
We don’t give ourselves the best chances of scoring by attacking from the boundary but the interesting analysis that came from last night was seeing our new forward focal point.
How many times did we kick to Ellard as our main go to forward?
FFS Malthouse you the pinnacle at hustling the masses at believing your tools are to blame.