Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 3:25 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 542 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 28  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
aboynamedsue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
I think I have come to a startling revelation about our team - it isn't very good. It's going to now take me an awful lot to convince me otherwise.

What ARE you talking about?

We nearly made the preliminary final in 2011!!

So we must be a monty to make the top 4 this year.....



It doesnt make us a monty but we should have high expectations.
The reality is we made the finals 3 years in a row with a very young list. Nothings changed. If anything, our young players should be improving.
Yet some fools here look at the tea leaves and suddenly we're an average list. Based on what? Missing the finals last year with a horrendous injury list.

Mind boggling.


What is mind boggling about having an opinion? I don't rate us as highly as you do BV. That's all.



Yes, but based on what? Surely you must be basing that opinion on some data or facts or information or something. What is it?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Synbad wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Synbad wrote:
We just need to get the fine tuning right... player wise and the way we are playing....
We will be ok...


I think the team is ok.... if we begin with the right players and ask them to play to their strengths.
Hampsons strength is NOT a key foward... if it is.... God help Hampson

Just getting back to the whole Warnock/Hammer/Kreuzer thinggy.

Warnock is a better ruckman than Hammer and Kreuzer
Kreuze is a better all round player than Hammer and Warnock


So logic says...... Hampson should be learning to play the only position he has a chance of making his own... Thats not a forward


Warnock just can't physically get on the park.


Thats not true... hes on the park.
Were going for the super athletic 'Heimy' ... cos he shows potential... and people think he will be a key forward...... he has a better chance as a ruckman cum frward..not as a forward cum ruckman

Anyway... one thing i notice about Geelong is their midfield is super great!Theyre stars!!.. and the mids set up the side


by the time you count to ten he'll be injured again

Kreuz is our ruck and Hammer or Rowe or Cas can give him a chop out


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Hes been fit.. its no excuse
26 he should be coming into his own as a ruckman
we just signed him up for 3 years.........

the lunacy of it all.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
Synbad wrote:
Correct and even still... HAmpson has hardly fired a shot....asking him to star as a key forward is a bit rich...

Its all about actually understanding the basics.

202 cm players have never been able to hold down key forward possies when they cant impose themselves on a game at any level period.!

Were just setting him up for a huge blow!!!..and then he will be scapegoated again...

Its ludicruous!!!



Duigan and yarran haven't had a good quarter of footy since 2011.

If our midfield had any smarts, they would have ran off hampson at every opportunity after he marked it. Gibbs did once and kicked a goal.

Until waite is ready, maybe hampson, and kreuzer could play forward and warnock to ruck all day. White could come in for versatility and one of the big men could be subbed if they are dysfunctional up forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
chelodina wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Correct and even still... HAmpson has hardly fired a shot....asking him to star as a key forward is a bit rich...

Its all about actually understanding the basics.

202 cm players have never been able to hold down key forward possies when they cant impose themselves on a game at any level period.!

Were just setting him up for a huge blow!!!..and then he will be scapegoated again...

Its ludicruous!!!



Duigan and yarran haven't had a good quarter of footy since 2011.

If our midfield had any smarts, they would have ran off hampson at every opportunity after he marked it. Gibbs did once and kicked a goal.

Until waite is ready, maybe hampson, and kreuzer could play forward and warnock to ruck all day. White could come in for versatility and one of the big men could be subbed if they are dysfunctional up forward.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:10 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
chelodina wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Correct and even still... HAmpson has hardly fired a shot....asking him to star as a key forward is a bit rich...

Its all about actually understanding the basics.

202 cm players have never been able to hold down key forward possies when they cant impose themselves on a game at any level period.!

Were just setting him up for a huge blow!!!..and then he will be scapegoated again...

Its ludicruous!!!



Duigan and yarran haven't had a good quarter of footy since 2011.

If our midfield had any smarts, they would have ran off hampson at every opportunity after he marked it. Gibbs did once and kicked a goal.

Until waite is ready, maybe hampson, and kreuzer could play forward and warnock to ruck all day. White could come in for versatility and one of the big men could be subbed if they are dysfunctional up forward.



There you go... some thinking points.

Even if i dont agree with everything you made some points.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Last edited by Synbad on Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:11 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
chelodina wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Correct and even still... HAmpson has hardly fired a shot....asking him to star as a key forward is a bit rich...

Its all about actually understanding the basics.

202 cm players have never been able to hold down key forward possies when they cant impose themselves on a game at any level period.!

Were just setting him up for a huge blow!!!..and then he will be scapegoated again...

Its ludicruous!!!



Duigan and yarran haven't had a good quarter of footy since 2011.

If our midfield had any smarts, they would have ran off hampson at every opportunity after he marked it. Gibbs did once and kicked a goal.

Until waite is ready, maybe hampson, and kreuzer could play forward and warnock to ruck all day. White could come in for versatility and one of the big men could be subbed if they are dysfunctional up forward.


Year can be lazy but he had 2 very good quarters on Thursday night and had some big games last year, it's more consistency with Yaz.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
Synbad wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Correct and even still... HAmpson has hardly fired a shot....asking him to star as a key forward is a bit rich...

Its all about actually understanding the basics.

202 cm players have never been able to hold down key forward possies when they cant impose themselves on a game at any level period.!

Were just setting him up for a huge blow!!!..and then he will be scapegoated again...

Its ludicruous!!!



Duigan and yarran haven't had a good quarter of footy since 2011.

If our midfield had any smarts, they would have ran off hampson at every opportunity after he marked it. Gibbs did once and kicked a goal.

Until waite is ready, maybe hampson, and kreuzer could play forward and warnock to ruck all day. White could come in for versatility and one of the big men could be subbed if they are dysfunctional up forward.



Theyre you go... some thinking points.

Even if i dont agree with everything you made some points.



Thanks pop


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:39 pm
Posts: 260
Location: Melb
Synbad wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Wow Synbad's comments take up a lot of room per page in this thread and he even uses the term 'cock-teaser'. BUT after actually reading through it, he is truly competing with my 6 month old for the amount of dribble produced.


Want a cold teething ring?


yeah give it to me... and ill give it right back... i promise.....im not kidding..!!!.. :thumbsup: :lol:

People here excited about a 7 season ruckman... who cant ruck yet... didnt capitalise on the score board. as a forward...made some crucial errors AGAIN!!...and laid not one tackle in a game of footy.....

Were all allowed to see things differently.. but for me to feel encouraged he has to do alot better than that...!!!


Have an opinion Synbad. Just don't support your argument by making stuff up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:15 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
Yazz was ordinary, he is a goal of the year highlight nowadays. Mid-forward is his position but he is down on confidence or lazy. Combination of both


Adam Chatfield wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Correct and even still... HAmpson has hardly fired a shot....asking him to star as a key forward is a bit rich...

Its all about actually understanding the basics.

202 cm players have never been able to hold down key forward possies when they cant impose themselves on a game at any level period.!

Were just setting him up for a huge blow!!!..and then he will be scapegoated again...

Its ludicruous!!!



Duigan and yarran haven't had a good quarter of footy since 2011.

If our midfield had any smarts, they would have ran off hampson at every opportunity after he marked it. Gibbs did once and kicked a goal.

Until waite is ready, maybe hampson, and kreuzer could play forward and warnock to ruck all day. White could come in for versatility and one of the big men could be subbed if they are dysfunctional up forward.


Year can be lazy but he had 2 very good quarters on Thursday night and had some big games last year, it's more consistency with Yaz.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
windows wrote:
Synbad wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Wow Synbad's comments take up a lot of room per page in this thread and he even uses the term 'cock-teaser'. BUT after actually reading through it, he is truly competing with my 6 month old for the amount of dribble produced.


Want a cold teething ring?


yeah give it to me... and ill give it right back... i promise.....im not kidding..!!!.. :thumbsup: :lol:

People here excited about a 7 season ruckman... who cant ruck yet... didnt capitalise on the score board. as a forward...made some crucial errors AGAIN!!...and laid not one tackle in a game of footy.....

Were all allowed to see things differently.. but for me to feel encouraged he has to do alot better than that...!!!


Have an opinion Synbad. Just don't support your argument by making stuff up.



YOU need to watch the game.....

:wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:54 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
ThePsychologist wrote:
Laidler should replace Duigan and Bell for AJ.

I would also have Rowe for Hampson and White for Tuohy who is struggling.

My line up would be:

B: Armfield Jamison Laidler
HB: Walker White Lucas

C: Simpson Gibbs Bootsma
Foll: Kruezer Judd Murphy

HF: Garlett Rowe Yarran
F: Betts Henderson Casboult

Int: Carrazzo Bell Robinson (McLean)

Jamo needs to step up and take Cloke. White on Lynch and Laidler on Goldsack.
Walker was very good last week at HB and I think with Armfield and Lucas can help with some run.

Like Bootsma and would like to see him on a wing. Can get into space and use his very good kicking skills.

Bell adds to mids and I would have McLean as sub. When pace goes out of game he can come in and help at stoppages.

Up forward is the issue. I have the three amigos who need to make forward pressure their first focus. The rest will follow.
I've moved Hendo forward and added Rowe at CHF. The reason is they are better at getting to the right spots and are good kicks. Natural forwards which we lack especially with Waite inj. Casboult then gets the third defender and isn't the focus. He is young and talented but can't be expected to carry the No.1 load yet. He may be swapped for Hampson as MM likes that big target.

IMO this adds variety and a bit more skill up forward. White can be swapped with Hendo if required.

In the end it comes down to winning contested ball and at the stoppages. We need 4 quarters of it.

Drop hammer?

Look I am not a fan but he played very well, the bolt will be gone well before he is


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:56 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
Duigan out he was woeful

Aj out just not upto it

Lads in even though out of form and guessing bell as well


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:57 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
Synbad wrote:
Hes been fit.. its no excuse
26 he should be coming into his own as a ruckman
we just signed him up for 3 years.........

the lunacy of it all.....

Assuming Warnock was signed as insurance nothing more


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:15 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Blue Vain wrote:
Yes, but based on what? Surely you must be basing that opinion on some data or facts or information or something. What is it?


I feel like we've had this discussion before BV. I don't intend to go over it all again, but it would be rude of me to ignore your questions....

Suffice to say that when I see Carlton play I do not see a side with a settled backline or quality forwards who consistently stand up in big games. I do not see a midfield that consistently strikes the right balance between attack and defence, or has shown a capacity to consistently work through adversity when the going gets really tough. I do not see a well balanced list with depth in most positions. I do not see a well-drilled team that is as disciplined and focused as the better sides. I do not see a side that really knows how to deliver the game style its coach wants it to play.

I was saying these things before the 2012 season started, so please stop talking about our injuries.

As I've said before, I am quite hopeful that this time next year (ie. after 2 pre-seasons and at least 22 AFL games under MM, and an active trade/FA week) we will be a stronger team (and club). But I see 2013 as the classic one step backwards to go two steps forward. I've said this before, but it reminds me a little of what Parkin had to do in 1991.

I would dearly love to be wrong, but I think we need to brace ourselves for more short term pain. However, at some point it should start to 'click' under MM. There's every chance we'll be 0-5, but then be 6-6. With decent luck re: injuries and close games (although it must be said that we are not off to a good start in either regard), we should press for a spot in the finals from there....but I cannot see us finishing above the likes of Haw, Syd, Coll, Geel and the WA clubs in 2013. History shows us that you have to finish top 4 to win the flag and there's only so many spots. I just don't think we're better than those clubs. Plus you have the likes of Adel, Ess, Rich & NM pushing up. I fear that at least some of these clubs have gone past us.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
So, what you're really sayin is we'll be worse under MM than BR....sheesh

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:40 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
teagueyubeauty wrote:
So, what you're really sayin is we'll be worse under MM than BR....sheesh


I'm not saying that at all. Quite the opposite in fact.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:08 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
aboynamedsue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Yes, but based on what? Surely you must be basing that opinion on some data or facts or information or something. What is it?


I feel like we've had this discussion before BV. I don't intend to go over it all again, but it would be rude of me to ignore your questions....

Suffice to say that when I see Carlton play I do not see a side with a settled backline or quality forwards who consistently stand up in big games. I do not see a midfield that consistently strikes the right balance between attack and defence, or has shown a capacity to consistently work through adversity when the going gets really tough. I do not see a well balanced list with depth in most positions. I do not see a well-drilled team that is as disciplined and focused as the better sides. I do not see a side that really knows how to deliver the game style its coach wants it to play.

I was saying these things before the 2012 season started, so please stop talking about our injuries.

As I've said before, I am quite hopeful that this time next year (ie. after 2 pre-seasons and at least 22 AFL games under MM, and an active trade/FA week) we will be a stronger team (and club). But I see 2013 as the classic one step backwards to go two steps forward. I've said this before, but it reminds me a little of what Parkin had to do in 1991.

I would dearly love to be wrong, but I think we need to brace ourselves for more short term pain. However, at some point it should start to 'click' under MM. There's every chance we'll be 0-5, but then be 6-6. With decent luck re: injuries and close games (although it must be said that we are not off to a good start in either regard), we should press for a spot in the finals from there....but I cannot see us finishing above the likes of Haw, Syd, Coll, Geel and the WA clubs in 2013. History shows us that you have to finish top 4 to win the flag and there's only so many spots. I just don't think we're better than those clubs. Plus you have the likes of Adel, Ess, Rich & NM pushing up. I fear that at least some of these clubs have gone past us.

Largely agree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
agree with abns

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10575
So it wasn't Ratten's fault that we failed last year?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 542 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 28  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group