Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 12:18 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:20 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
True BR,

Last nights game certainly made Richmond and Carlton look more like making the 8 than StKilda and Geelong. God what an awful game.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:39 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
ryan2000 wrote:
True BR,

Last nights game certainly made Richmond and Carlton look more like making the 8 than StKilda and Geelong. God what an awful game.

So Ryan, how much money did you lose on Thursday night? :lol: :razz:

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:51 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lucky.

Be thankful we put it together in the last and got home. Was good to be tested and come through with a win.

Lots to learn about our structure from tonight. There are some things you just cant simulate over pre-season.

Curnow :thumbsup:


Can't simulate playing flankers/ruckman in key positions over the pre-season. Our key players need fitness.

Structure comes with Jamo, Bower/Watson, Kreuzer, Henderson and Waite available to choose from in our spine. All of a sudden Robbo's long bombs become contested by big men and the amigos can play there role, Jamo keeps Jack to 3-4 goals by playing tight


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:03 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
Drewgirl wrote:
Idiots, no mention how we were missing our whole spine.

Jammo - full back
Bower - Centre half back
Kreuzer-Ruck
Hendo - centre half forward
Waite - Full forward ( more than half a game)

Every team would struggle with that.....

Richmond full strength- Thats All!!


We had our whole spine missing but our effort was certainly not spineless given we won in the last quarter with i player down, 3 tired interchange, 15 point defecit and our reputation on the line.

Cometh the hour
Cometh the man.

Good for us it wasn't just the man JUDD, but a host of supporting cast like Curnow, Armfield, Murphy, Scotland, Simpson, Gibbs, Robinson, Warnock and even Hampson (who reminded me of Paul Salmon with those long leads and height no one could match).

Great effort team. Great comeback. Thanks for the 4 pts...and the relief.

Having looked at that 3rd Q again, I just can't see a lack of effort, and I could see a heap of luck for Richmond and an amazing lift from the Tigers across the board. The pill was all of the sudden slippery and we didn't adapt quick enough. We just couldn't hold that slippery footy; that's all it really was imo...and maybe...probably... we took the foot off the pedal too.

Great first game for Duigan. I thought he was strong, head over the ball and ran well; breaking the lines and creating a goal being the highlight (of things to come). Laidler was quicker than I had anticipated, and his defensive work was very good (one exception) and his kicking...wow. Lastly Curnow. Just as I expected. Fantastic. Covered heaps of ground. We've discovered a gem.

IMO if Robinson and Curnow keep that work rate up they are going to keep out McLean Ellard and Joseph from what I saw.

AS soon as the rain started in the 3rd, that's when the wheels fell off in the 3rd. But we regrouped; thank god for 3 qtr time breaks to halt the onslaught. Why couldn't our on field leaders do something to quell the onslaught? Says something about our onfield leadership, or we were too buggered or something like that?

We'll get better for the outing; no doubt

My only criticism was bombing the ball into the forwardline, especially after Waite was down and no Hendo, and the issue I had that there was no ruckmen presenting either. That would not work against the Saints or Cats, so we have to find another way to goal. Betttts and Garlett should not be flying for the ball and getting crunched in packs; they are the crumbers. Walker has to learn that his goals come from being on the run. He should lead more, run more, present more and he has the engine to cover more ground and work his opponent over. I hope some one tells him that.

Everyone had the bloody yips in front of goal. It wasn't just Hampson. It was Warnock, Judd, Murphy, Waite, Walker, Simmo....I really hope Simmo finds his kicking boot of 4 years back, because he's lost that side of his game. He's not kicking with confidence imo. But the reality is that Waite Walker and Hampson are not reliable kicks at goal, and the way we are set up at the moment, they are going to be having a few shots at goal from hard work done upfield. They have to stop wasting opportunities. Tex needs to put his head down and bum up and stop showing off and trying to be 'da man' with his attitude (kick it high to me, me ...me) and his flying for MoY.

Well done to White, but as I stated before the game, White is not the right match up for Jack R, and the only one available to match him for size was Watson, and Setanta was next in line for size, but he was injured too. Watson hasn't a got preseason under his belt, but seems to be doing fine amongst the big boys, and Jack had an interupted preseason. That was the match up for Jack imo.
Sorry but TBird was lost a lot, and lagged a bit, but I was rapt that when he was heading sideways (like the Saints and Cats do but don't get criticised), at the last second he'd straighten up and kick down the guts. I don't know if that's the right choice, but I know that's what supporters and critics of TBird want to see. So what does that say about the way Cats and Saints play? I'm at a loss as to whatTbird has to do to win admirers. I think his days are over, because he has been maligned by the MC.

Like Stamos, I wasn't impressed with Scotto's first 3 Q's. He's a favourit of mine, but I thought he was coasting a bit, and then in the last showed everyone what he can bring to the table, and usually does.

Lucas is very rusty, and not the same kid I saw last year when he was running really well and the ball was sticking. Needs to find touch and get on with his natural god given ability. Carrazzo looked a bit underdone too. I too am in favour of Carrazzo being a ball hunter in the midfield rather than plating the link man. He has the strength the size and the experience to help out Robinson, Curnow in the guts. He is not a great kick, so why play that role of play maker?

Waite's brain snap with the kick.....what an idiot. What does this guy think he is? Suspend him for the Suns game so we can get rid of his carry over points and teach him a lesson for trying to test the Review Panel's patience. Prized flower...and no longer my favourite player...although still in my top 5....when he's behaving himself.

I really like the way Gibbs was allowed to play outside role, and be given the room to use his footy skills; great move.
Armfield's pace just goes to show everyone how important pace is in the modern game....Garlett and Betts showed us a different pace and those 2 were great contributors. I know some say Garlett was a bit quiet, but I reckon some of his leads were not honored, but at least he was presenting, and his pressure on the ball carrier, like Betts is uncanny and he kicks goals when we really need them.

Overall a good result, and hopefully we learned a lot about our list, our gaps, our depth and got rid of the cobwebs.

We have a lot to look forward to with the return of Bower next week along with Henderson (if Waite's rubbed out), Jamison the week after, , along with the much anticipated return of Kreuuuuuuzer, Watson may also break into the teamand of course the class of Houlihan...and McLean and Ellard pressuring Curnow, Robinson and Carrazzo for their spot in the team.

But most of all we fought back for the 4 points.....against the ferals.

Thank god the footy's back.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Last edited by bondiblue on Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:05 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10595
ryan2000 wrote:
True BR,

Last nights game certainly made Richmond and Carlton look more like making the 8 than StKilda and Geelong. God what an awful game.


Again fell asleep watching this crap StKilda dish up!
I was under the impression "genius Lyon" was going to make them more attacking!!! :lol:
The only thing that makes me happy is that they are gooonnnneeeee......and footy will be better for it. :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:12 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
bondiblue wrote:
Drewgirl wrote:
Idiots, no mention how we were missing our whole spine.

Jammo - full back
Bower - Centre half back
Kreuzer-Ruck
Hendo - centre half forward
Waite - Full forward ( more than half a game)

Every team would struggle with that.....

Richmond full strength- Thats All!!


We had our whole spine missing but our effort was certainly not spineless given we won in the last quarter with i player down, 3 tired interchange, 15 point defecit and our reputation on the line.

Cometh the hour
Cometh the man.

Good for us it wasn't just the man JUDD, but a host of supporting cast like Curnow, Armfield, Murphy, Scotland, Simpson, Gibbs, Robinson, Warnock and even Hampson (who reminded me of Paul Salmon with those long leads and height no one could match).

Great effort team. Great comeback. Thanks for the 4 pts...and the relief.

Having looked at that 3rd Q again, I just can't see a lack of effort, and I could see a heap of luck for Richmond and an amazing lift from the Tigers across the board. The pill was all of the sudden slippery and we didn't adapt quick enough. We just couldn't hold that slippery footy; that's all it really was imo...and maybe...probably... we took the foot off the pedal too.

Great first game for Duigan. I thought he was strong, head over the ball and ran well; breaking the lines and creating a goal being the highlight (of things to come). Laidler was quicker than I had anticipated, and his defensive work was very good (one exception) and his kicking...wow. Lastly Curnow. Just as I expected. Fantastic. Covered heaps of ground. We've discovered a gem.

IMO if Robinson and Curnow keep that work rate up they are going to keep out McLean Ellard and Joseph from what I saw.

AS soon as the rain started in the 3rd, that's when the wheels fell off in the 3rd. But we regrouped; thank god for 3 qtr time breaks to halt the onslaught. Why couldn't our on field leaders do something to quell the onslaught? Says something about our onfield leadership, or we were too buggered or something like that?

We'll get better for the outing; no doubt

My only criticism was bombing the ball into the forwardline, especially after Waite was down and no Hendo, and the issue I had that there was no ruckmen presenting either. That would not work against the Saints or Cats, so we have to find another way to goal. Betttts and Garlett should not be flying for the ball and getting crunched in packs; they are the crumbers. Walker has to learn that his goals come from being on the run. He should lead more, run more, present more and he has the engine to cover more ground and work his opponent over. I hope some one tells him that.

Everyone had the bloody yips in front of goal. It wasn't just Hampson. It was Warnock, Judd, Murphy, Waite, Walker, Simmo....I really hope Simmo finds his kicking boot of 4 years back, because he's lost that side of his game. He's not kicking with confidence imo. But the reality is that Waite Walker and Hampson are not reliable kicks at goal, and the way we are set up at the moment, they are going to be having a few shots at goal from hard work done upfield. They have to stop wasting opportunities. Tex needs to put his head down and bum up and stop showing off and trying to be 'da man' with his attitude (kick it high to me, me ...me) and his flying for MoY.

Well done to White, but as I stated before the game, White is not the right match up for Jack R, and the only one available to match him for size was Watson, and Setanta was next in line for size, but he was injured too. Watson hasn't a got preseason under his belt, but seems to be doing fine amongst the big boys, and Jack had an interupted preseason. That was the match up for Jack imo.
Sorry but TBird was lost a lot, and lagged a bit, but I was rapt that when he was heading sideways (like the Saints and Cats do but don't get criticised), at the last second he'd straighten up and kick down the guts. I don't know if that's the right choice, but I know that's what supporters and critics of TBird want to see. So what does that say about the way Cats and Saints play? I'm at a loss as to whatTbird has to do to win admirers. I think his days are over, because he has been maligned by the MC.

Like Stamos, I wasn't impressed with Scotto's first 3 Q's. He's a favourit of mine, but I thought he was coasting a bit, and then in the last showed everyone what he can bring to the table, and usually does.

Lucas is very rusty, and not the same kid I saw last year when he was running really well and the ball was sticking. Needs to find touch and get on with his natural god given ability. Carrazzo looked a bit underdone too. I too am in favour of Carrazzo being a ball hunter in the midfield rather than plating the link man. He has the strength the size and the experience to help out Robinson, Curnow in the guts. He is not a great kick, so why play that role of play maker?

Waite's brain snap with the kick.....what an idiot. What does this guy think he is? Suspend him for the Suns game so we can get rid of his carry over points and teach him a lesson for trying to test the Review Panel's patience. Prized flower...and no longer my favourite player...although still in my top 5....when he's behaving himself.

I really like the way Gibbs was allowed to play outside role, and be given the room to use his footy skills; great move.
Armfield's pace just goes to show everyone how important pace is in the modern game....Garlett and Betts showed us a different pace and those 2 were great contributors. I know some say Garlett was a bit quiet, but I reckon some of his leads were not honored, but at least he was presenting, and his pressure on the ball carrier, like Betts is uncanny and he kicks goals when we really need them.

Overall a good result, and hopefully we learned a lot about our list, our gaps, our depth and got rid of the cobwebs.

We have a lot to look forward to with the return of Bower next week along with Henderson (if Waite's rubbed out), Jamison the week after, , along with the much anticipated return of Kreuuuuuuzer, Watson may also break into the teamand of course the class of Houlihan...and McLean and Ellard pressuring Curnow, Robinson and Carrazzo for their spot in the team.

But most of all we fought back for the 4 points.....against the ferals.


TL; DR......except for this bit:

bondiblue wrote:
Thank god the footy's back.


HELL YES!

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
Kaptain Kouta....I know you are artistic, creative and hip: and I'm not.

So tell me what does "TL; DR" mean?

Tel lim he's dreamnin.....perhaps?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:36 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:03 pm
Posts: 765
eric pascoe wrote:
Imagine for one moment that Collingwood played Richmond tonight and they were down by 14 points at 3Q time and were without their best 2 forwards and their best two backs plus their number one draft pick and had only 3 on the bench and then came out and destroyed the opposition in the last quarter, after having dominated the first half but but for poor kicking at goal should have been game over at half time.......Just imagine........Everyone would be saying what an amazing team they are......People on here really need to get some perspective and appreciate the positives.


Really, really, really, really salient post. IMO POW

_________________
1945 - End of round 3 Carlton was last.

Last round Carlton made the final four for the first time.

Eventual premiers.

That's what I'm talking about!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:42 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
bondiblue wrote:
My only criticism was bombing the ball into the forwardline, especially after Waite was down and no Hendo, and the issue I had that there was no ruckmen presenting either. That would not work against the Saints or Cats, so we have to find another way to goal. Betttts and Garlett should not be flying for the ball and getting crunched in packs; they are the crumbers. Walker has to learn that his goals come from being on the run. He should lead more, run more, present more and he has the engine to cover more ground and work his opponent over. I hope some one tells him that.


After watching last nights game, our game , our preseason games and collingwood and st kilda last year i get the impression that long bombing into the forward line is tactic that goes hand in hand with the forward press. Gone are the days of clearing out the fifty leaving space for the full forward.
I am seeing a lot more of the attacking team players inside their own fifty. 50's are more congested than ever. I reckon the idea is to not get out marked. Anything else is a win for the attacking side. A forward mark = shot at goal. A crumbing shot on goal if possible if it hits the ground. A stoppage with the press in place or congestion that makes it near impossible for the opposition to clear on their terms.
In my opinion this is the plan. Walker going for screamers is more Walker making sure the op dont mark it. Same with betts.
In the third quarter the tigers got more players back to our last player to makes sure they won the ball. Our press was lame and our effort to stop them on the way out was about 10% less than the first half and last quarter. We also lost loads of contested ball leaving our inexperienced defence open.

I do agree that when we forced a turn over and had the tigers on the break with an open forward line we didnt us the ball well and often made the wrong decisions by foot or players lead to where loose players were. We need to get on top of that.

Last nights game as well as our game also showed that it is very hard to keep up the press and zones for 4 quarters. THis will open up a lot of games and shows that the 3 interchange rule could be a winner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
bondiblue wrote:
Kaptain Kouta....I know you are artistic, creative and hip: and I'm not.

So tell me what does "TL; DR" mean?

Tel lim he's dreamnin.....perhaps?

Too Long; Didn't Read


Image

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:09 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15012
Blue Revival wrote:
after last nights dogs breakfast of a game between 2 top 4 sides,we dont look quite so bad, eh?

I was watching last nights game and was thinking the same thing. Richmond will surprise a few sides this year and have some good kids. Lets face it the game should been over at quarter time had we kicked straight. Why is it that everyone loves to kick the boots into Carlton? I dont get it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:47 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 6154
eric pascoe wrote:
Imagine for one moment that Collingwood played Richmond tonight and they were down by 14 points at 3Q time and were without their best 2 forwards and their best two backs plus their number one draft pick and had only 3 on the bench and then came out and destroyed the opposition in the last quarter, after having dominated the first half but but for poor kicking at goal should have been game over at half time.......Just imagine........Everyone would be saying what an amazing team they are......People on here really need to get some perspective and appreciate the positives.


:clap:

WE'RE GONE! WE'RE JUST GONE! Oooh, shadow. Oooh, envy.

Wrong club...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:55 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:38 am
Posts: 1313
Location: brunton room
Mitch Robinson had a good game but gee alot of his disposals are rubbish. Love his hit en hard style of grunt work but needs to polish up his kicking if he is ever going to be a star of the game.

_________________
You heard it here first!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Robbo would've been suited to the game as it was 30 years ago. Before rule changes and "Saints footy" came along and destroyed everything.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
just imagine if you didnt have your spine , how hard it would be to walk around - let alone win a game of footy

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:28 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:37 pm
Posts: 1932
Hotcox wrote:
Mitch Robinson had a good game but gee alot of his disposals are rubbish. Love his hit en hard style of grunt work but needs to polish up his kicking if he is ever going to be a star of the game.


If you watch the game again a lot of Mitch's bad kicks are because he has not had the space, mainly due to winning his own ball and getting it out of danger. Granted he needs to lower his eyes when kicking inside 50.

_________________
Koperek.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:30 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
TheSwan wrote:
Hotcox wrote:
Mitch Robinson had a good game but gee alot of his disposals are rubbish. Love his hit en hard style of grunt work but needs to polish up his kicking if he is ever going to be a star of the game.


If you watch the game again a lot of Mitch's bad kicks are because he has not had the space, mainly due to winning his own ball and getting it out of danger. Granted he needs to lower his eyes when kicking inside 50.



Everyone had their bombing moments...it seemed to be our plan...??

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:37 pm
Posts: 1932
TheBluesMuse wrote:
TheSwan wrote:
Hotcox wrote:
Mitch Robinson had a good game but gee alot of his disposals are rubbish. Love his hit en hard style of grunt work but needs to polish up his kicking if he is ever going to be a star of the game.


If you watch the game again a lot of Mitch's bad kicks are because he has not had the space, mainly due to winning his own ball and getting it out of danger. Granted he needs to lower his eyes when kicking inside 50.



Everyone had their bombing moments...it seemed to be our plan...??


and when we did bomb it in long our smalls went up as well as Hampson!

_________________
Koperek.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16964
Location: Melbourne
Not sure if this has been posted anywhere but this is something guys like Bartlett may have missed

Our Back 6 at the start of play

Duigan - 0 games
Laidler - 2
White - 6
Yarran - 22 as forward
+
Thornton - 161
Russell 93

So thats 4 guys with a total of 8 games as AFL defenders. And the 1st time those 4 have played together in an AFL game infront of 60,000 fans

Puts it into a bit more perspective I think.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:07 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
Ive changed my tune a bit since Thursday night.
I think we underestimate just how much we were dominating that game for 3.5 out of 4 qtrs.
I was very impressed with Curnow.. just makes the McLean trade hurt even more knowing we couldve added a valuable first rounder to throw into the mix.

Areas we NEED to improve to ensure we arent once again a bubble team:
* goal kicking- its patently obvious that many of our forwards have absolutely no confidence when they line up for goal
* decision making- this comes from the coaching staff. Repetitive game simulation drills need to be ramped up- still too many players pick the wrong option with the ball.
* lack of talk: This was most prevalent when we have a 2-1 advantage, both of our men would go up for a contest leaving nobody on the ground for the crumb.

Love the look of Laidler. Seems a very steady hand in defence..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group