Laguna wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
I don't know which is becoming more boring and tedious
Those calling for Russell exclusion
Or
Those calling for Setanta inclusion
The most sensible comment in 2009. Thank you!
I really hope people on this site start to understand that Setanta is not up to AFL standard - and we will not win a premiership with him in the 22.
I admire his dedication to a new sport, but he has absolutely no idea on the football field.
I really hope people don't worry about posters who value his position on our list.
He isn't going anywhere this year, so if we need him to achieve our goal for the year, finals (and I'm hoping GF) well we can call on him if we want. I think that's useful till the end of the year.
I don't just want to be a breeding ground for kids of the future. I like to aim for flags every year we may win one with a bit of luck.
We've got a good list and its going to get better.
Have a look at that team, with or without Setanta, its pretty good isn't it?
But lets say against a team (Adelaide) who we play this week, whom last time we played them we didn't have any tall timber to combat them with and lost, without Setanta. Ratts wished he had Setanta then. I think he's better in 2009 than he was in 2008.
He's been picked this year again when some said it was over. So he's on the radar. Live with it.
Horses for courses, we all know that phrase, well that's the same philosophy most of his fans and Ratts adopt with him (at the very least). I like him as a player, a bit unco, and so is Bower... but these guys have that x factor you just can't describe. They seem to get out of trouble, they take the game on, and they make something happen. Definetely not boring.
Don't let that worry you.