Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 6:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 236 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Some people on this site, seriously hang around for Carlton to LOSE a game so that can swoop in a drown this site in negative crap.

Or look for an excuse to support their own agenda. ie, sack the coach.


If thats what they think is best then they are aloud to say it.

I think many of you have had the same thought but wouldn't dare bringing it up


So after 10 weeks, if you are thinking that the coach should be sacked, you seriously have no idea.

Don't speak for everyone Melvin.

Why don't you start a new thread with a poll - titled After 10 Weeks, Should Brett Ratten be Sacked as Coach of the Carlton Football Club and see how that goes instead of assuming otherwise?


i love it when you call me Melvin!!

I never said i want our coach sacked. I said im sure some have thought or questioned it at some stage over the 16 weeks and the preseason

I want what's best for this club what ever it's going to take



Look here Melvey.. can you stop following my posts with one of yours basically supporting what im saying????

Its bad for the credibility stakes for me.... :-D

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:29 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Jeez I must be crazy.

I thought going into to last week's game we had won four of our last six.

I thought we had generally beaten teams we should have, and lost to teams we had minimal expectations of beating.

I thought for the first time in six years we were a relevant team in the finals race longer than round 3.

I thought we had gone and won at Subiaco, and knocked off three teams we had an abmysmal recent record against.

I thought for the first time in years we had seen genuine improvement from youngsters in key positions.

I thought we had done all this with our best two midfielders (maybe three depending on how you view Hadley) clearly (and still) underdone.

I thought we had done all this with our best six backmen playing a total four games together. More than that, I thought for the first time in six years we could see a bunch of 6-8 players and say - there's our backline for five years.

I thought we had done all this with one midget ruckman trying his guts out and two babies trying to give us a contest.

I thought we had seen for the first time in forever some spirit in the team and a resolve not to lay down when tide turned against them.

I thought we had done all this with the youngest list in the comp who until this year had NOTHING in the way of leadership within the group.

Nah, I must be crazy because clearly we're going nowhere.

I didn't realise that teams could turn on the quality tap and have a group of boys stand up to men who have played together for six years plus and just make it happen - after all of 16 weeks of playing together.

FFS some people here amaze me.

Seeing as some of you are so upset at what you are seeing, go spend some time and have a look at Hawthorn's results in Clarkson's first ten weeks coaching, and some of the articles screaming for his head. You may find it enlightening.


Last edited by Punter22 on Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:29 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Synbad wrote:
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Some people on this site, seriously hang around for Carlton to LOSE a game so that can swoop in a drown this site in negative crap.

Or look for an excuse to support their own agenda. ie, sack the coach.


If thats what they think is best then they are aloud to say it.

I think many of you have had the same thought but wouldn't dare bringing it up


So after 10 weeks, if you are thinking that the coach should be sacked, you seriously have no idea.

Don't speak for everyone Melvin.

Why don't you start a new thread with a poll - titled After 10 Weeks, Should Brett Ratten be Sacked as Coach of the Carlton Football Club and see how that goes instead of assuming otherwise?


i love it when you call me Melvin!!

I never said i want our coach sacked. I said im sure some have thought or questioned it at some stage over the 16 weeks and the preseason

I want what's best for this club what ever it's going to take



Look here Melvey.. can you stop following my posts with one of yours basically supporting what im saying????

Its bad for the credibility stakes for me.... :-D


:-D Melvin = The Sideler from Seinfeld

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Punter22 wrote:
Jeez I must be crazy.

I thought going into to last week's game we had won four of our last six.

I thought we had generally beaten teams we should have, and lost to teams we had minimal expectations of beating.

I thought for the first time in six years we were a relevant team in the finals race longer than round 3.

I thought we had gone and won at Subiaco, and knocked off three teams we had an abmysmal recent record against.

I thought for the first time in years we had seen genuine improvement from youngsters in key positions.

I thought we had done all this with our best two midfielders (maybe three depending on how you view Hadley) clearly (and still) underdone.

I thought we had done all this with our best six backmen playing a total four games together. More than that, I thought for the first time in six years we could see a bunch of 6-8 players and say - there's our backline for five years.

I thought we had done all this with one midget ruckman trying his guts out and two babies trying to give us a contest.

I thought we had seen for the first time in forever some spirit in the team and a resolve not to lay down when tide turned against them.

I thought we had done all this with the youngest list in the comp who until this year had NOTHING in the way of leadership within the group.

Nah, I must be crazy because clearly we're going nowhere.

I didn't realise that teams could turn on the quality tap and have a group of boys stand up to men who have played together for six years plus and just make it happen - after all of 16 weeks of playing together.

FFS some people here amaze me.

Seeing as some of you are so upset at what you are seeing, go spend some time and have a look at Hawthorn's results in Clarkson's first ten weeks coaching, and some of the articles from screaming for his head. You may find it enlightening.


Punter why do people bring up Clarkeson???

Why not bring up someone like say.... Mike Patersons first 10 games.. ???

or Timmy Watsons???

Why is Clarkeson...???

IS Ratts Clarkeson???
Is Carlton HAwthorn?????

Thats like saying Lyon is Roos and StKilda is Sydney...

OR... wait for it.....

StKilda was Brisbane... and Thomas was MAthews....!!!!


I dind those kind of comparisons absolutely ridiculous.........!!!..... seriously......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Synbad wrote:
After all Donstuie didnt wanna tank.. and now he just wears his Juddy jumper to bed....with a Kreuzer badge on it...

Look if you cant criticise things you love you dont care about it....

Actually it's my gf that wears the Juddy jumper to bed, but that's another story ;)

You're right, I didn't want to tank, and as rapt as I am to have Judd and Kreuzer I wouldn't change my stance even in hindsight. In fact, I find the uproar here after every loss, and the cries about losing and falling over being unacceptable, even more ridiculous when compared with the tune many here were playing this time last year, but that's another issue.

Criticise away though. Hell, I'm critical of some things too, but unlike some here (not necessarily you) I won't be caught waiting for bad things to happen to my team just so I can say I told you so and feed my own bile. Case in point, Jordan Russell. I can't understand what he's doing in the team, but would rather he actually do something to prove me wrong than see him disappear without showing anything, and would gladly admit to my guff if he did. But the attitude from some people here seems to be that being right is more important than the success of the team, and I know I'm not the only one who gets pissed off by this.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Last edited by Donstuie on Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
If you never raise questions you will never search for answers... if you dont have answers youre dumb!!!....

take my word for it... thats how the world works...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:40 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Synbad wrote:

Punter why do people bring up Clarkeson???

Why not bring up someone like say.... Mike Patersons first 10 games.. ???

or Timmy Watsons???

Why is Clarkeson...???

IS Ratts Clarkeson???
Is Carlton HAwthorn?????

Thats like saying Lyon is Roos and StKilda is Sydney...

OR... wait for it.....

StKilda was Brisbane... and Thomas was MAthews....!!!!


I dind those kind of comparisons absolutely ridiculous.........!!!..... seriously......


You don't see any similarities between Carlton and Hawthorn? Seriously?

Tons of early draft picks, pretty much a total clean out of the list with an untried, unproven coach - and you see no similarities? Come on Synners - you're better than that.

The main difference I see is that they got more picks than we have, thanks to our penalties and their trades. We still have some clearing out to do, but I would say after next preseason, this list will just about be totally turned over and even younger than this year.

Which is about two years after the Hawks finished their clean out, and is about how far behind them I think the Blues are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Punter22 wrote:
Synbad wrote:

Punter why do people bring up Clarkeson???

Why not bring up someone like say.... Mike Patersons first 10 games.. ???

or Timmy Watsons???

Why is Clarkeson...???

IS Ratts Clarkeson???
Is Carlton HAwthorn?????

Thats like saying Lyon is Roos and StKilda is Sydney...

OR... wait for it.....

StKilda was Brisbane... and Thomas was MAthews....!!!!


I dind those kind of comparisons absolutely ridiculous.........!!!..... seriously......


You don't see any similarities between Carlton and Hawthorn? Seriously?

Tons of early draft picks, pretty much a total clean out of the list with an untried, unproven coach - and you see no similarities? Come on Synners - you're better than that.

The main difference I see is that they got more picks than we have, thanks to our penalties and their trades. We still have some clearing out to do, but I would say after next preseason, this list will just about be totally turned over and even younger than this year.

Which is about two years after the Hawks finished their clean out, and is about how far behind them I think the Blues are.



i see the similarities with draft picks and talent...

but i dont take anything for granted... the moment you think u know its all under control.. and its just going to happen for you...... it will explode in your face...

it doesnt take much you know for things to go belly up....

its all about tutoring and understanding and playing to patterns ... and once that happens... it will trandlate into wins and confidence...

but when the basics are untouched... its hard to think ts just going to happen....you can easily kid yourself...

this isnt about winning a few games against clubs that happen to be more of a rabble....

its about winning with sustainability... and a TRUE wndow of pportunity to make all this worth it... A FLAG!!!

Draft picks give you hope..... development in a purefair dinkum sense will make it a reality...

Nothing else is acceptable for Carlton...

Nothing else is acceptable for what weve gone through,,,

i want the kick ins organised cos then that means i take confidence that other set ups are correct.. the ones in the heat of the battle...
.. and players know how to work for one another... not for themselves..

its basics...

ts hard... but it is still the footy basics...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Synbad wrote:
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Some people on this site, seriously hang around for Carlton to LOSE a game so that can swoop in a drown this site in negative crap.

Or look for an excuse to support their own agenda. ie, sack the coach.


If thats what they think is best then they are aloud to say it.

I think many of you have had the same thought but wouldn't dare bringing it up


So after 10 weeks, if you are thinking that the coach should be sacked, you seriously have no idea.

Don't speak for everyone Melvin.

Why don't you start a new thread with a poll - titled After 10 Weeks, Should Brett Ratten be Sacked as Coach of the Carlton Football Club and see how that goes instead of assuming otherwise?


i love it when you call me Melvin!!

I never said i want our coach sacked. I said im sure some have thought or questioned it at some stage over the 16 weeks and the preseason

I want what's best for this club what ever it's going to take



Look here Melvey.. can you stop following my posts with one of yours basically supporting what im saying????

Its bad for the credibility stakes for me.... :-D


What creditability?? [edited by mods]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:52 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Synners, to that I would say;

I've seen more improvement in these 10 weeks of H&A football than I have in six years.

Judd himself has said it's going to take a couple of years for the onfield performance to truly gel - looking at teams such as Hawthorn and Geelong, this contention holds water. Geelong took longer because they are fragile.

I would say based on that, Ratts deserves at least the length of his contract to carry on. Dick said he wanted 8 games at the start of the season and that's where we're headed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Punter22 wrote:
Synners, to that I would say;

I've seen more improvement in these 10 weeks of H&A football than I have in six years.

Judd himself has said it's going to take a couple of years for the onfield performance to truly gel - looking at teams such as Hawthorn and Geelong, this contention holds water. Geelong took longer because they are fragile.

I would say based on that, Ratts deserves at least the length of his contract to carry on. Dick said he wanted 8 games at the start of the season and that's where we're headed.


The way were playing Judd he wont be able to play in 2 years...so i suppose we will have to do it wothout Judd....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:01 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Synbad wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
Synners, to that I would say;

I've seen more improvement in these 10 weeks of H&A football than I have in six years.

Judd himself has said it's going to take a couple of years for the onfield performance to truly gel - looking at teams such as Hawthorn and Geelong, this contention holds water. Geelong took longer because they are fragile.

I would say based on that, Ratts deserves at least the length of his contract to carry on. Dick said he wanted 8 games at the start of the season and that's where we're headed.


The way were playing Judd he wont be able to play in 2 years...so i suppose we will have to do it wothout Judd....


Synners, I can't believe that on any level, we would be risking him in any way this year - especially given what happened to him last year at WC.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
His groins arent the only thing screaming.... in fact its the rest of him thats screaming for help...

believe it...


unless we work at protecting him and each other............




same goes with fev,,,,


Ratts gameplan right now is subpar relying on a couple over the many...

i hope he improves....and we improve.. not the win loss ratio... that will come good when you rectify the basics and improve on that...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:28 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Synbad wrote:
His groins arent the only thing screaming.... in fact its the rest of him thats screaming for help...

believe it...


unless we work at protecting him and each other............




same goes with fev,,,,


Ratts gameplan right now is subpar relying on a couple over the many...

i hope he improves....and we improve.. not the win loss ratio... that will come good when you rectify the basics and improve on that...


Synners, they are kids - it's only natural the older, harder bodies get more than their share of the load. The only cure for that is time - time for learning, and time for their bodies to mature.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:44 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Synbad wrote:
If you never raise questions you will never search for answers... if you dont have answers youre dumb!!!....

take my word for it... thats how the world works...


so according to your logic, you either know everything (yet refuse to answer 1/2 the questions posed to you when they counter your arguements) or you are dumb...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:06 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
If you never raise questions you will never search for answers... if you dont have answers youre dumb!!!....

take my word for it... thats how the world works...


so according to your logic, you either know everything (yet refuse to answer 1/2 the questions posed to you when they counter your arguements) or you are dumb...


If im dumb and youre smart how come you would have traded Fev 4 years ago and kept Lance???....and each second to third post of yours for 4 or 5 years is about trading Fev...???

Just out of curiosity...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Punter22 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
His groins arent the only thing screaming.... in fact its the rest of him thats screaming for help...

believe it...


unless we work at protecting him and each other............




same goes with fev,,,,


Ratts gameplan right now is subpar relying on a couple over the many...

i hope he improves....and we improve.. not the win loss ratio... that will come good when you rectify the basics and improve on that...


Synners, they are kids - it's only natural the older, harder bodies get more than their share of the load. The only cure for that is time - time for learning, and time for their bodies to mature.



it hurts when you dont yell out "youre hot" or block for teamates... especially young bodies...

But even little Giansiracusa can block big Kosi if you understand how to do it...and even little Eddie Betts can tackle better than Waite

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:29 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
If you never raise questions you will never search for answers... if you dont have answers youre dumb!!!....

take my word for it... thats how the world works...


so according to your logic, you either know everything (yet refuse to answer 1/2 the questions posed to you when they counter your arguements) or you are dumb...


If im dumb and youre smart how come you would have traded Fev 4 years ago and kept Lance???....and each second to third post of yours for 4 or 5 years is about trading Fev...???

Just out of curiosity...

I've never claimed to be smart - and I certainly dont follow your logic.

On Fev - I'd have traded him years ago on the basis of his poor onfield application and high trade value. I also recognise the drawbacks of having him as our primary/dominant forward (90+% of I50 entries directed to him) and the impact that has on our other forwards that we have tried to develop (who are invariably starved of the ball). I've tempered my calls for him to be traded as his on field application has improved over the past year or so, however I am still willing to trade him for a good deal as I believe our current team (which is still in development mode) would benefit more from having multiple 'lesser' forward targets rather than the one dominant force.

On lance, I felt he had a fair bit to offer the team though due to circumstances he was being played out of position (I'd have had him deep forward/FF). I'm still comfortable with that position. In terms of what went wrong - well knee injuries and being forced to switch continually back and forward shortened his career.

So now that I've explained my position, perhaps you wish to expand on your logic - do you claim to know everything or are you dumb? or perhaps you just dont think through every rant before you post it...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:27 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
If you never raise questions you will never search for answers... if you dont have answers youre dumb!!!....

take my word for it... thats how the world works...


so according to your logic, you either know everything (yet refuse to answer 1/2 the questions posed to you when they counter your arguements) or you are dumb...


If im dumb and youre smart how come you would have traded Fev 4 years ago and kept Lance???....and each second to third post of yours for 4 or 5 years is about trading Fev...???

Just out of curiosity...

I've never claimed to be smart - and I certainly dont follow your logic.

On Fev - I'd have traded him years ago on the basis of his poor onfield application and high trade value. I also recognise the drawbacks of having him as our primary/dominant forward (90+% of I50 entries directed to him) and the impact that has on our other forwards that we have tried to develop (who are invariably starved of the ball). I've tempered my calls for him to be traded as his on field application has improved over the past year or so, however I am still willing to trade him for a good deal as I believe our current team (which is still in development mode) would benefit more from having multiple 'lesser' forward targets rather than the one dominant force.

On lance, I felt he had a fair bit to offer the team though due to circumstances he was being played out of position (I'd have had him deep forward/FF). I'm still comfortable with that position. In terms of what went wrong - well knee injuries and being forced to switch continually back and forward shortened his career.

So now that I've explained my position, perhaps you wish to expand on your logic - do you claim to know everything or are you dumb? or perhaps you just dont think through every rant before you post it...


yeah thanks for explaining yourself..... but it was ridiculous thinking...!!!

again thanks...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:42 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6431
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
If you never raise questions you will never search for answers... if you dont have answers youre dumb!!!....

take my word for it... thats how the world works...


so according to your logic, you either know everything (yet refuse to answer 1/2 the questions posed to you when they counter your arguements) or you are dumb...


If im dumb and youre smart how come you would have traded Fev 4 years ago and kept Lance???....and each second to third post of yours for 4 or 5 years is about trading Fev...???

Just out of curiosity...

I've never claimed to be smart - and I certainly dont follow your logic.

On Fev - I'd have traded him years ago on the basis of his poor onfield application and high trade value. I also recognise the drawbacks of having him as our primary/dominant forward (90+% of I50 entries directed to him) and the impact that has on our other forwards that we have tried to develop (who are invariably starved of the ball). I've tempered my calls for him to be traded as his on field application has improved over the past year or so, however I am still willing to trade him for a good deal as I believe our current team (which is still in development mode) would benefit more from having multiple 'lesser' forward targets rather than the one dominant force.

On lance, I felt he had a fair bit to offer the team though due to circumstances he was being played out of position (I'd have had him deep forward/FF). I'm still comfortable with that position. In terms of what went wrong - well knee injuries and being forced to switch continually back and forward shortened his career.

So now that I've explained my position, perhaps you wish to expand on your logic - do you claim to know everything or are you dumb? or perhaps you just dont think through every rant before you post it...


yeah thanks for explaining yourself..... but it was ridiculous thinking...!!!

again thanks...


Whitnall was finished as a footballer because he couldnt run . The writing was on the wall in his B+F year because his last half was ordinary like the other 3 .ON top of that he was lazy and a bad example off the field.


The other thing that you have to do in todays footy is occasionally go in and get the ball yourself because all players are stronger and tactics at ballups are far more advanced than a few years ago.
A few of our "stars "better change their ways and start helping each other out otherwise the game will pass them by in a different way.

On Fev I would only offer him 2 years because
1He been an idiot off the field and whether he likes it or not is damaged goods through his own fault

2 His body may not last the season because of his groins. This has happened the last 2 years.

Fev will be 29 in 2010


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 236 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group