Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 6:00 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1987 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 100  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:38 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
I thought he said that he didn't know how they were going when asked as soon as he sat down.

He said that twice - he didn't know how negotiations were going.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
DownUnderChick wrote:
I thought he said that he didn't know how they were going when asked as soon as he sat down.

He said that twice - he didn't know how negotiations were going.


Yes exactly. He said multiple times words to the effect that it was with management and he didn't know much about it.

Considering the forum, and the badgering of him which was going on I don't know how you could expect much else.

I'm as harsh on him as the next bloke but I think we're getting a bit carried away here. He's doing well leave him be.

If an extra 100k is what incentivises Fev to keep the skipper in his pants, then pay him and pay him gladly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1351
Punter22 wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
I thought he said that he didn't know how they were going when asked as soon as he sat down.

He said that twice - he didn't know how negotiations were going.


Yes exactly. He said multiple times words to the effect that it was with management and he didn't know much about it.

Considering the forum, and the badgering of him which was going on I don't know how you could expect much else.

I'm as harsh on him as the next bloke but I think we're getting a bit carried away here. He's doing well leave him be.

If an extra 100k is what incentivises Fev to keep the skipper in his pants, then pay him and pay him gladly.


I'd prefer we pay him an incentive if he was to achieve a minimum of 50 goals or something in each year of the new contract. I fail to see why someone should get 100K to help with keeping their "skipper" in their pants or some other form of bad behaviour. It shouldn't be asking too much for Fev to be mature enough to leave his past problems in the past, learn from those mistakes and simply put all his energy into being a valuable player for the Carlton Football Club now and for the rest of his career....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
You can also see it as Fev being 'fined' $100,000 if he does the wrong thing if you spin it the other way.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:22 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
I thought he said that he didn't know how they were going when asked as soon as he sat down.

He said that twice - he didn't know how negotiations were going.


Yes exactly. He said multiple times words to the effect that it was with management and he didn't know much about it.

Considering the forum, and the badgering of him which was going on I don't know how you could expect much else.

I'm as harsh on him as the next bloke but I think we're getting a bit carried away here. He's doing well leave him be.

If an extra 100k is what incentivises Fev to keep the skipper in his pants, then pay him and pay him gladly.


I'd prefer we pay him an incentive if he was to achieve a minimum of 50 goals or something in each year of the new contract. I fail to see why someone should get 100K to help with keeping their "skipper" in their pants or some other form of bad behaviour. It shouldn't be asking too much for Fev to be mature enough to leave his past problems in the past, learn from those mistakes and simply put all his energy into being a valuable player for the Carlton Football Club now and for the rest of his career....


I'd prefer the incentive to be based on more team orientated stats - 1%rs, tackles etc rather than goals.

I'd also prefer the incentive component to make up a greater proportion of Fevs contract (ie 2-300k as opposed to 100k).

Interesting to see how things pan out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Say you draw up a contract 4thchicken which says if Fevola lays 5 tackles a game and achieves seven 1 percenters a game he will be rewarded financially, what happens in a game where we absolutely smash the opposition and Fevola gets 12 goals from beautiful midfield passing and he doesn't even have to lay a tackle because the opposition are so woeful?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
verbs wrote:
Say you draw up a contract 4thchicken which says if Fevola lays 5 tackles a game and achieves seven 1 percenters a game he will be rewarded financially, what happens in a game where we absolutely smash the opposition and Fevola gets 12 goals from beautiful midfield passing and he doesn't even have to lay a tackle because the opposition are so woeful?


You could always base his bonuses on Dream Team points :lol:

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
4thchicken wrote:

I'd prefer the incentive to be based on more team orientated stats - 1%rs, tackles etc rather than goals.

I'd also prefer the incentive component to make up a greater proportion of Fevs contract (ie 2-300k as opposed to 100k).

Interesting to see how things pan out.



I'd suggest the club isn't concerned so much with what he does on the field. It's clear that when his head is on straight, those areas of the game you're referring to are clear for all to see. So putting the $$ into that isn't addressing the issue.

The concern is what happens off the field, and hence the reason they incentivise him there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
verbs wrote:
Say you draw up a contract 4thchicken which says if Fevola lays 5 tackles a game and achieves seven 1 percenters a game he will be rewarded financially, what happens in a game where we absolutely smash the opposition and Fevola gets 12 goals from beautiful midfield passing and he doesn't even have to lay a tackle because the opposition are so woeful?


It would be over a season as opposed to a single game - if Fev averaged 5 tackles and 7 1%rs/game over the course of a season then we wouldnt have to worry about his goal tally as the goals would come to the team through increased forward line pressure/opportunities.

Even in a single game, regardless of how woeful the opposition has been, I doubt there would be a case where all of our forward 50 entries were marked and converted to goals without the opposition spoiling the ball etc. Players can always chase/harass/spoil/tackle...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Then there may be games where the opposition flood, or absolutely belt us with the ball rarely entering our forward 50. Again, Fevola would be penalised financially for something he has no control over.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:41 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
verbs wrote:
Say you draw up a contract 4thchicken which says if Fevola lays 5 tackles a game and achieves seven 1 percenters a game he will be rewarded financially, what happens in a game where we absolutely smash the opposition and Fevola gets 12 goals from beautiful midfield passing and he doesn't even have to lay a tackle because the opposition are so woeful?


Like Collingwood? 8)

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:01 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Quote:
Just the first move in what will no doubt be heated negotiation. Nothing to worry about at all but I hope it's played out behind closed doors and not on the back pages.

In Swann we trust.


Seemed to me Fev was appearing on the Footy Show in order to get public support in his negotiations :?

The Footy Show's always looking for a story. If you haven't got one then make one...

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 12:04 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
isdonis.george wrote:
Quote:
Just the first move in what will no doubt be heated negotiation. Nothing to worry about at all but I hope it's played out behind closed doors and not on the back pages.

In Swann we trust.


Seemed to me Fev was appearing on the Footy Show in order to get public support in his negotiations :?

The Footy Show's always looking for a story. If you haven't got one then make one...


TFS pays Fev about $80K a year to appear on the program at least 6 times a year.

The club, which isn't a fan of the show and him appearing on it, previously couldn't afford or did not want to pay him the amount to avoid him appearing.

I'm hoping that the alleged $100K good behaviour covers TFS and Fev not appearing on it.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 9:08 pm
Posts: 7
Just heard on Channel 10's 'Half time report' that Fev has rejected 3 years & 2 million.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:12 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 3523
Location: looking for a good bloke to have a beer with
according to John Ralph on (the half time report" (read half baked report). Mike Sheahan has a report in tomorrow's HUN that say Fev has formally rejected a 3yr $2mil deal. He is not interested in bonuses, cars or other clauses. He (Ralph) also mentioned we have "wiggle room" in the cap and Fev and his management know this - the implication being he is holding the club to ransom.

As I said on P1 I hoped this would be played out behind closed doors but it appears Fev or his new management would rather do it in the press.

Dave Allison anyone?

_________________
I'm shocked to be sitting here


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
It's his call. If he wants to do it that way, he can risk losing a lot of respect from Carlton people in the process.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:39 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 572
We should draw a walk away line, if Fev and his mgm want something beyond that then he is up for trade or can go to Melbourne in the psd.

If HS is writing an article then its probably Carlton mgm who are placing pressure on Fev. HS has a +ve Carlton bias.

Everyone is replacable. I am sure we can get good return on a trade.

If we give in to ranson then it sets preceedent for future negotiations, which by the looks of the talent we have on hand are going to be tough.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:46 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
my two cents wrote:
We should draw a walk away line, if Fev and his mgm want something beyond that then he is up for trade or can go to Melbourne in the psd.

If HS is writing an article then its probably Carlton mgm who are placing pressure on Fev. HS has a +ve Carlton bias.

Everyone is replacable. I am sure we can get good return on a trade.

If we give in to ranson then it sets preceedent for future negotiations, which by the looks of the talent we have on hand are going to be tough.


Yep, do not get sucked in like Carlton under Elliot.

Stick to a figure, or get something for him in a very good draft if he wants to screw the club.

I love Fev as a player, always have since he came to the club, but no one player should ever damage the team.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Donstuie wrote:
It's his call. If he wants to do it that way, he can risk losing a lot of respect from Carlton people in the process.


Oooh, scary!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Jarusa wrote:
my two cents wrote:
We should draw a walk away line, if Fev and his mgm want something beyond that then he is up for trade or can go to Melbourne in the psd.

If HS is writing an article then its probably Carlton mgm who are placing pressure on Fev. HS has a +ve Carlton bias.

Everyone is replacable. I am sure we can get good return on a trade.

If we give in to ranson then it sets preceedent for future negotiations, which by the looks of the talent we have on hand are going to be tough.


Yep, do not get sucked in like Carlton under Elliot.

Stick to a figure, or get something for him in a very good draft if he wants to screw the club.

I love Fev as a player, always have since he came to the club, but no one player should ever damage the team.


Something like letting him go to Melbourne in the PSD? :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1987 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 100  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group