Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
in8;
Hmm... 'Subjective rubbish' on the Collingwood players, eh? Well I'd say Dane Beams having 21 touches and kicking two goals on Friday was a fair contribution which suggests he's pretty constructive in that team. Seriously - if you were a football club you'd be accused of tanking.
While you're at it, instead of having a crack at me, tell me why Ratts is the man.
Thats the one thing you can never get an answer for from the Ratts is the man men....
They can never say why he is the man... just that he is... not why... just that he is......
The answer of course is they dont know why.......... "its the vibe"...... the Denis Denuto argument of course....
You can never get an answer from any of these blokes for that question.... they squirm this way.post their little pictures... or point to other coaches.. (who by the way have had succesful...assistant role groundings .. twist thataway...but cant say WHY!!!...
Its the killer punch.....
"Why is he... can you explain ?"...
it just goes dead.....
Well Synners I reckon it must be fear based...I think to admit that maybe Ratts has shown nothing is to to then admit that we have screwed up yet again as a club. Some supporters will probably find this too much to bare after what the club has been through and after the hope that was created post Pratt. But if this is the case surely its better to admit you're wrong and rectify than it is to pray to the footy Gods that what ur feeling isn't real...

see this is where I laugh.
The only 'fear based' is the reaction to ratts and the belief the answer must come now or the club will collapse and never recover. Pagan was not the man, we ares till here and even better, we have improved is many, many areas despite the 'pagan years' - though learning how to win again might still be an issue that is hurting Ratts - after all 2 years ago we have the worst record of any club over 7 years in recent history - thats gotta hurt.
If Ratts is not the man then the club will begin (may already have begun - hence Synner's political rallying here

) to replace him.
I think the panic may be because of the widow of opportunity fallacy.
Take St Kilda (please take...) Many thought their window was rapidly closing while Rossy the boy wonder dragged them into their defensive hinterland for a time
who now thinks that window has even remotely shifted?
Drafting is a rolling game not a stationary game - building a list is probably the wrong language - (although for Carlton it could be argued we first needed to build). It is a far more fluid action/reaction than that. Right now we are approaching an exciting time because many of our our kids will soon become the core of this list in age and experience - that will give us greater flexibility to draft, to trade, to alter the list as quickly as Ross has done at St Kilda. Once the basics are right the list can be changed quickly (Adelaide is another example - even West Coast will soon make people drool again) I think, finally, this club has the basics in place - but only the basics. Regardless of the coach - only the basics.
and age and experience is needed for this list to really take off - no matter who the coach. So for me its not about a screaming match 'Ratts must go now versus no he is great'
its more a bit of a smile - I cannot see the panic even though Ratts has not won me over and I and my brothers sometimes want to strangle him, I'll wait and while waiting I'll enjoy the development of players like Kruise and Hammer and Bower and Austin and JR and many others - some of who will make it, some of who will not - regardless of who is coach.
I will say (as I have in a another thread) if the club decides that Ratts is not the man I do hope we have a detailed and professional process to find out who should coach Carlton (if only to shut up all the people who bag Ratts because of a 'lack' of process).
and I hope as a club we manage that change well so that Ratts is not lost to us, a proud champion always.